God or a higher power straight up doesn't exist

[childishkillah]

You claimed that God exists outside of time and space (the universe). No one, not even top scientists, know what, if anything, exists outside of time and space, so you can't make any claims about that. I'm dealing with known reality here, not speculation or fantasy.

Prove how my argument is illogical. And the reality shows everything within the universe has an origin utter subhuman retard.

 

[luuk]

I'm not saying that

"there's a god but we don't know who he is"

Or

"There's a higher power"

No, there isn't. There is no higher power or god, js straight up

There is no higher power

water

 

[ICXCLuvr]

The definition of God is a transcendental being that is above time space and matter.


Which he is the beginning of everything.

@Part-Time Chad @babymoo

Why can’t that also be the universe

 

[MouthBreathingElite]

Go back to shitposting Peter Scully edits little dalit

 

[ngannou]

Why can’t that also be the universe

even scientist doesn't approve physical matter come out of nowhere or self existing

 

[ngannou]

the great "beyond comprehension" cope
so strong that requires at least 2 theists to be tagged to be agreed with

self - existing = I am who I am

 

[babymoo]

The fuck this has to do with my reply?

Your mom likes sucking jewish cock

 

[Deleted member 315326]

You claimed that God exists outside of time and space (the universe). No one, not even top scientists, know what, if anything, exists outside of time and space, so you can't make any claims about that. I'm dealing with known reality here, not speculation or fantasy.

The question about God's existence is a metaphysical one and not something that can purely answered through the scientific method. Besides, you don't give a reason why we should just assume your epistemic position that things can only be known if visually scene or tested through the scientific method. If your still stubborn in this belief there are plenty of widely documented apparitions and the shroud of Turin. Still, I think that the best place to start is with arguments such as the argument from change.

 

[Part-Time Chad]

The question about God's existence is a metaphysical one and not something that can purely answered through the scientific method. Besides, you don't give a reason why we should just assume your epistemic position that things can only be known if visually scene or tested through the scientific method. If your still stubborn in this belief there are plenty of widely documented apparitions and the shroud of Turin. Still, I think that the best place to start is with arguments such as the argument from change.

Like I stated, no one knows if anything exists outside of time and space, so it's presumptuous to make claims about a "God" existing in that realm. You have absolutely no way of knowing that. Therefore, my disbelief in the existence of "God" is more reasonable than your claim to the contrary.

 

[Deleted member 315326]

ok but answer the question why visual perception and the scientific method is your whole epistemic grounding.