Going from 5'9 to 6'0 will increase your chances to score more than anything you can do to your face.

splunx

splunx

Iron
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
Posts
127
Reputation
204
Discuss.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, The giga incel, PURE ARYAN GENETICS and 14 others
5’9 to 5’12 would do more tbh
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Incoming, SkinjobCatastrophe, thecel and 41 others
Shit thread in all honesty. Once your 5’9 a great face is better than being ugly and 6’0
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, teenagepisces, Deleted member 7173 and 44 others
DEl5wnQUQAA6xSM
 
  • JFL
Reactions: godirl and Deleted member 4804
C O P E

I'm 6'6 in lifts and it still isn't enough
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: tdawg, Effortless, CopeIsReal and 5 others
so why do i get more girl recognition than my psl 5-5.5 6'2-6'3 friends?

5'9.5 manlet btw
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, middayshowers, Chadethnic101 and 4 others
Shit thread in all honesty. Once your 5’9 a great face is better than being ugly and 6’0
Nope I don't think so. I'm 6'0, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.
so why do i get more girl recognition than my psl 5-5.5 6'2-6'3 friends?

5'9.5 manlet btw
Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DharkDC
So you're suggesting using lifts OP or is there a secret height increase tips you have for us?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jagged0
i bet my oneitis would see me as less of a joke if i were 6'
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, KDA Player, ArgentineOmicron and 3 others
Nope I don't think so. I'm 5'9, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.

Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.
Yeah if you’ve got a great face and body being 5’9 isn’t a deal breaker to like 90+% of women. You’re either ugly or aspie if you’re having no success while being 5’9.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Incoming, Chadethnic101 and 5 others
C O P E

I'm 6'6 in lifts and it still isn't enough
that has nothing to do with ur hight buddy. in fact, ur too tall for most girls.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Chadethnic101, godlikesz and 9 others
Nope I don't think so. I'm 6'0, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.

Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.
If you are anything below 6'2 then you better have a 7/10 face
My guess your face is not a 7/10 so keep coping fucku
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469 and Joodz
that has nothing to do with ur hight buddy. in fact, ur too tall for most girls.

@Fuk Tell this nigga what's up, below 6'9 is a death sentence. I'm legit getting LL to ascend.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3123 and Deleted member 3962
average female in 2020 is 6'0
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Tyronecell, tdawg, turkproducer and 4 others
Lol why’d OP edit from saying he was 5’9 to to 6’0?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: tdawg, turkproducer, Effortless and 2 others
@Fuk Tell this nigga what's up, below 6'9 is a death sentence. I'm legit getting LL to ascend.
ive talked to this imbecile before and unfortunately he will never get it due to years of coping that have rendered his brain into a smooth soggy mush.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: sprikly and Griffith
This is cope. I’m 6’1 and I’d way rather be a 5’9 chad looking like O’bry than a mid to high tier normie. 5’9 will still slay more
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Deleted member 7313, tdawg and 3 others
Yeah if you’ve got a great face and body being 5’9 isn’t a deal breaker to like 90+% of women. You’re either ugly or aspie if you’re having no success while being 5’9.
No, thats not in line with statistics.

TatjBHs


You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
If you are anything below 6'2 then you better have a 7/10 face
My guess your face is not a 7/10 so keep coping fucku

Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
This is cope. I’m 6’1 and I’d way rather be a 5’9 chad looking like O’bry than a mid to high tier normie. 5’9 will still slay more
This thread isn't relevant to you. I bet with the same face, and a 5'9 height, you would do abysmal with women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, 5'8manlet and LordNorwood
No, thats not in line with statistics.

View attachment 236635

You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option


Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine

There is a difference in how tall you look and how tall you are though. If you have bad proportions you can easily look 1-2 inches shorter than you are and vice versa.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Effortless
No, thats not in line with statistics.

View attachment 236635

You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option


Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
1579560411173
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: hairyballscel, Deleted member 3123 and Golden Glass
You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
That’s not how statistics works. Having 50% more women view you as datable, just because they know you’re 6’0, doesn’t mean jack if your face is ugly. You’re height can be “datable” for 90% of women but if you’re fucked facially that 90% won’t care lmao. Meanwhile; if you’re 5’9 with a top 10% face, you might have a smaller starting dating pool of women who would consider your height as datable, but you’d have far more total success among them.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Deleted member 7173, Incoming and 13 others
T
That’s not how statistics works. Having 50% more women view you as datable, just because they know you’re 6’0, doesn’t mean jack if your face is ugly. You’re height can be “datable” for 90% of women but if you’re fucked facially that 90% won’t care lmao. Meanwhile; if you’re 5’9 with a top 10% face, you might have a smaller starting dating pool of women who would consider your height as datable, but you’d have far more total success among them.
That's not my argument. My argument is that going from a height of 5'9 to 6'0, saying that you have a non-outlier face (AKA in the mean) will do much more for you than significantly looks-maxing the face.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
No shit?!
Just so you know 6'0 isn't really considered tall nigga that's why I said anything BELOW 6'2 you need a 7/10 face to be a true slayer.
I would say a 7/10 face would do good until 5'6 depends on where you live
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Effortless, Deleted member 3195, forwardgrowth and 2 others
No shit?!
Just so you know 6'0 isn't really considered tall nigga that's why I said anything BELOW 6'2 you need a 7/10 face to be a true slayer.
I would say a 7/10 face would do good until 5'6 depends on where you live
I would say a 7/10 face and 5'10 and above you'll do decent. Anything below you're gonna struggle.
 
No, thats not in line with statistics.

View attachment 236635

You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option


Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine

This thread isn't relevant to you. I bet with the same face, and a 5'9 height, you would do abysmal with women.
JFL at believing what women say. They're so fucking stupid when it comes to measurements.

When I was in Ireland and I talked to a girl about male heights she was very adamant about not willing to date anyone below 6'. When I asked her if 5'12" was enough she AND her friend both said no :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Chadethnic101, tdawg, EverythingMattersCel and 12 others
T

That's not my argument. My argument is that going from a height of 5'9 to 6'0, saying that you have a non-outlier face (AKA in the mean) will do much more for you than significantly looks-maxing the face.
Yeah I disagree. The mean male face I pretty unattractive in a scale of beauty. And if you have a top 10% face at 5’9, being 6’0 with a 50 percentile face would be worse. Having a larger dating pool doesn’t mean jack if you’re And that was your argument here:

You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
^^^Here you equate having 50% dating options as increasing your attractiveness. It shouldn’t take a statistician to realize how dumb this statement is.

It’s like saying living in a city increases your attractiveness vs living in a small town, because there are much more women in a big city, and thus you have a larger dating pool of potential partners. Such a stupid, stupid thing to say.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
JFL at believing what women say. They're so fucking stupid when it comes to measurements.

When I was in Ireland and I talked to a girl about male heights she was very adamant about not willing to date anyone below 6'. When I asked her if 5'12" was enough she AND her friend both said no :lul:
Eh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
Eh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.
“I think”
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Chadethnic101, TheEndHasNoEnd and 3 others
Yeah I disagree. The mean male face I pretty unattractive in a scale of beauty. And if you have a top 10% face at 5’9, being 6’0 with a 50 percentile face would be worse. Having a larger dating pool doesn’t mean jack if you’re And that was your argument here:


^^^Here you equate having 50% dating options as increasing your attractiveness. It shouldn’t take a statistician to realize how dumb this statement is.

It’s like saying living in a city increases your attractiveness vs living in a small town, because there are much more women in a big city, and thus you have a larger dating pool of potential partners. Such a stupid, stupid thing to say.

Are you suggesting having 50% more dating options as to not equating with an increase in attractiveness? So there is no statistical advantage in going from 5'8 to 6'2? get out of here.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
Eh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.
You are coping so hard it hurts

The only time three inches makes a difference as big as you think is when those three inches are between your legs
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, TheEndHasNoEnd, Alibaba69 and 5 others
You are coping so hard it hurts

The only time three inches makes a difference as big as you think is when those three inches are between your legs
im talking STATISTICALLY, there is a very huge jump from going to 5'9 to 6'0. That is all im saying.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
Are you suggesting having 50% more dating options as to not equating with an increase in attractiveness? So there is no statistical advantage in going from 5'8 to 6'2? get out of here.
1. Lol first you compared 5’9 to 6’0, now 5’8 to 6’2? Your Jewish methods won’t go unnoticed.

2. You also editted to say you are 6’0 when you originally wrote 5’9, so likely you’re a short ugly guy who thinks he fails with women due to height. JFL

3. Sure there’s an advantage from 6’2 to 5’8 in general...but “more than doubling your attractiveness”? Let’s unpack it.

5’8 to 6’2 is a more dramatic difference than 5’9-6’0, but the same principle applies. Since you want to increase the height difference (compared to your previous claim), it’s only reasonable to increase the facial attractiveness difference as well, if not, you’re biasing heavily in favor of the height difference. So a 5’8 guy with a 9-9.5/10 face would have a smaller dating pool but more total success, while 6’2 guy with a 3.5-4/10 face would have a larger dating pool but within his larger pool would likely less success. The difference in overall success between the two would be in favor of the man with a smaller pool, but who could get much more girls within that pool.

4. You fucking moron.
You are coping so hard it hurts

The only time three inches makes a difference as big as you think is when those three inches are between your legs
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Chadethnic101, tdawg and 8 others
Massive cope.

I'm 6ft 1 and I am a virgin while there are people shorter than 5'9" who slay on a daily basis.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Deleted member 7173, Chadethnic101 and 6 others
im talking STATISTICALLY, there is a very huge jump from going to 5'9 to 6'0. That is all im saying.
Can you read? Women are fucking retards when it comes to measurements. Some don't even know that 5'12" is the same thing as 6'

Notice the difference between 5'9" and 5'10" in that survey? JFL if you think they can tell the difference.

Also JFL at believing what women say in general
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: TheEndHasNoEnd, turkproducer, Effortless and 2 others
Can you read? Women are fucking retards when it comes to measurements. Some don't even know that 5'12" is the same thing as 6'

Notice the difference between 5'9" and 5'10" in that survey? JFL if you think they can tell the difference.

Also JFL at believing what women say in general
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
 
5'9 Chad > 6'2 Normie
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Deleted member 7173, Chadethnic101 and 2 others
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
LOL at trying to anecdotally come off as an authority over statistical data.
 
i dont know if 5ft9 to 6ft would make a big difference, but from 5ft5 to 5ft9? absolutely.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Pietrosiek, Mediocre Normalfag and 1 other person
LOL at trying to anecdotally come off as an authority over statistical data.
You can’t even understand what the stats say. You fucking moron.

If stats show that more women live in large cities (and thus there’s a higher dating pool), does that mean living in a large city increases your sexual attractiveness? No. If you’re getting rejected in a small town due to your, you’re still going to get rejected in a large city even if you have more options. The same exact thing is true for height. Being 6’0 gives you more options than being 5’9. But an attractive 5’9 man will have more total success than an ugly 6’0 man.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
You can’t even understand what the stats say. You fucking moron.

If stats show that more women live in large cities (and thus there’s a higher dating pool), does that mean living in a large city increases your sexual attractiveness? No. If you’re getting rejected in a small town due to your, you’re still going to get rejected in a large city even if you have more options. The same exact thing is true for height. Being 6’0 gives you more options than being 5’9. But an attractive 5’9 man will have more total success than an ugly 6’0 man.
100 percent agreed. Now try to describe the point im making.
 
i dont know if 5ft9 to 6ft would make a big difference, but from 5ft5 to 5ft9? absolutely.
Yes of course, just like if you live in a town of 50 people, living in a large city will give you massively larger dating pool.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
Yeah this guy is hopeless, doesn't understand the stats he's citing AND he doesn't understand that women know fuck all about measurements.

Let him cope
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 19469, Effortless and Golden Glass
This was the “point” you were making, which was a blatant misunderstanding of the original stats. You nonce.
You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
Imagine thinking stats like these show an ugly 6’0 guy would have more success than a great looking 5’9 guy....stats where the women are just going to assume the man is the same and the only difference is in height.

What a dweeb.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Effortless
cope too hard u gonna fuck around and drown off this wave
 
  • JFL
Reactions: turkproducer
1579562464517
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: tdawg, hairyballscel, TheEndHasNoEnd and 3 others
HAHA okay you guys win XD
 
  • +1
Reactions: Golden Glass

Similar threads

ydkm9119
Replies
30
Views
486
ydkm9119
ydkm9119
ketamin
Replies
4
Views
83
A_Ron_Kool_Aid
A_Ron_Kool_Aid
kurd
Replies
3
Views
362
grilldaddy❤️
grilldaddy❤️
mortuary
Replies
6
Views
112
mortuary
mortuary
smaxx01
Replies
21
Views
524
supremegentlemancel
supremegentlemancel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top