
splunx
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
- Posts
- 127
- Reputation
- 204
Discuss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
5'12 is 6'0...5’9 to 5’12 would do more tbh
Nope I don't think so. I'm 6'0, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.Shit thread in all honesty. Once your 5’9 a great face is better than being ugly and 6’0
Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.so why do i get more girl recognition than my psl 5-5.5 6'2-6'3 friends?
5'9.5 manlet btw
Yeah if you’ve got a great face and body being 5’9 isn’t a deal breaker to like 90+% of women. You’re either ugly or aspie if you’re having no success while being 5’9.Nope I don't think so. I'm 5'9, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.
Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.
that has nothing to do with ur hight buddy. in fact, ur too tall for most girls.C O P E
I'm 6'6 in lifts and it still isn't enough
If you are anything below 6'2 then you better have a 7/10 faceNope I don't think so. I'm 6'0, there's a very drastic and palpable difference when it comes to these 3 inches. One is going from mogging 50% of men, to 85%.
Cause they have shit faces and unattractive personalities.
that has nothing to do with ur hight buddy. in fact, ur too tall for most girls.
Good heavens, is that true?!5'12 is 6'0...
ive talked to this imbecile before and unfortunately he will never get it due to years of coping that have rendered his brain into a smooth soggy mush.@Fuk Tell this nigga what's up, below 6'9 is a death sentence. I'm legit getting LL to ascend.
No, thats not in line with statistics.Yeah if you’ve got a great face and body being 5’9 isn’t a deal breaker to like 90+% of women. You’re either ugly or aspie if you’re having no success while being 5’9.
If you are anything below 6'2 then you better have a 7/10 face
My guess your face is not a 7/10 so keep coping fucku
This thread isn't relevant to you. I bet with the same face, and a 5'9 height, you would do abysmal with women.This is cope. I’m 6’1 and I’d way rather be a 5’9 chad looking like O’bry than a mid to high tier normie. 5’9 will still slay more
No, thats not in line with statistics.
View attachment 236635
You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
No, thats not in line with statistics.
View attachment 236635
You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
That’s not how statistics works. Having 50% more women view you as datable, just because they know you’re 6’0, doesn’t mean jack if your face is ugly. You’re height can be “datable” for 90% of women but if you’re fucked facially that 90% won’t care lmao. Meanwhile; if you’re 5’9 with a top 10% face, you might have a smaller starting dating pool of women who would consider your height as datable, but you’d have far more total success among them.You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
That's not my argument. My argument is that going from a height of 5'9 to 6'0, saying that you have a non-outlier face (AKA in the mean) will do much more for you than significantly looks-maxing the face.That’s not how statistics works. Having 50% more women view you as datable, just because they know you’re 6’0, doesn’t mean jack if your face is ugly. You’re height can be “datable” for 90% of women but if you’re fucked facially that 90% won’t care lmao. Meanwhile; if you’re 5’9 with a top 10% face, you might have a smaller starting dating pool of women who would consider your height as datable, but you’d have far more total success among them.
No shit?!Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
I would say a 7/10 face and 5'10 and above you'll do decent. Anything below you're gonna struggle.No shit?!
Just so you know 6'0 isn't really considered tall nigga that's why I said anything BELOW 6'2 you need a 7/10 face to be a true slayer.
I would say a 7/10 face would do good until 5'6 depends on where you live
JFL at believing what women say. They're so fucking stupid when it comes to measurements.No, thats not in line with statistics.
View attachment 236635
You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
Nope, if ur 6'0 and have a 7/10 face you'll do fine
This thread isn't relevant to you. I bet with the same face, and a 5'9 height, you would do abysmal with women.
Yeah I disagree. The mean male face I pretty unattractive in a scale of beauty. And if you have a top 10% face at 5’9, being 6’0 with a 50 percentile face would be worse. Having a larger dating pool doesn’t mean jack if you’re And that was your argument here:T
That's not my argument. My argument is that going from a height of 5'9 to 6'0, saying that you have a non-outlier face (AKA in the mean) will do much more for you than significantly looks-maxing the face.
^^^Here you equate having 50% dating options as increasing your attractiveness. It shouldn’t take a statistician to realize how dumb this statement is.You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
Eh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.JFL at believing what women say. They're so fucking stupid when it comes to measurements.
When I was in Ireland and I talked to a girl about male heights she was very adamant about not willing to date anyone below 6'. When I asked her if 5'12" was enough she AND her friend both said no![]()
“I think”Eh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.
Yeah I disagree. The mean male face I pretty unattractive in a scale of beauty. And if you have a top 10% face at 5’9, being 6’0 with a 50 percentile face would be worse. Having a larger dating pool doesn’t mean jack if you’re And that was your argument here:
^^^Here you equate having 50% dating options as increasing your attractiveness. It shouldn’t take a statistician to realize how dumb this statement is.
It’s like saying living in a city increases your attractiveness vs living in a small town, because there are much more women in a big city, and thus you have a larger dating pool of potential partners. Such a stupid, stupid thing to say.
You are coping so hard it hurtsEh I think women are intrinsically and biologically wired to assess size more than men are. They can intrinsically tell which men are are bigger and stronger. I think going from 5'9 to 6'0 makes a real difference.
im talking STATISTICALLY, there is a very huge jump from going to 5'9 to 6'0. That is all im saying.You are coping so hard it hurts
The only time three inches makes a difference as big as you think is when those three inches are between your legs
1. Lol first you compared 5’9 to 6’0, now 5’8 to 6’2? Your Jewish methods won’t go unnoticed.Are you suggesting having 50% more dating options as to not equating with an increase in attractiveness? So there is no statistical advantage in going from 5'8 to 6'2? get out of here.
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.You are coping so hard it hurts
The only time three inches makes a difference as big as you think is when those three inches are between your legs
Can you read? Women are fucking retards when it comes to measurements. Some don't even know that 5'12" is the same thing as 6'im talking STATISTICALLY, there is a very huge jump from going to 5'9 to 6'0. That is all im saying.
He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.Can you read? Women are fucking retards when it comes to measurements. Some don't even know that 5'12" is the same thing as 6'
Notice the difference between 5'9" and 5'10" in that survey? JFL if you think they can tell the difference.
Also JFL at believing what women say in general
LOL at trying to anecdotally come off as an authority over statistical data.He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
You can’t even understand what the stats say. You fucking moron.LOL at trying to anecdotally come off as an authority over statistical data.
100 percent agreed. Now try to describe the point im making.You can’t even understand what the stats say. You fucking moron.
If stats show that more women live in large cities (and thus there’s a higher dating pool), does that mean living in a large city increases your sexual attractiveness? No. If you’re getting rejected in a small town due to your, you’re still going to get rejected in a large city even if you have more options. The same exact thing is true for height. Being 6’0 gives you more options than being 5’9. But an attractive 5’9 man will have more total success than an ugly 6’0 man.
Yes of course, just like if you live in a town of 50 people, living in a large city will give you massively larger dating pool.i dont know if 5ft9 to 6ft would make a big difference, but from 5ft5 to 5ft9? absolutely.
Yeah this guy is hopeless, doesn't understand the stats he's citing AND he doesn't understand that women know fuck all about measurements.He doesn’t even understand the stats he’s citing. And it’s obvious he’s heavily emotionally invested in this thread (greycel) Move on bro.
Imagine thinking stats like these show an ugly 6’0 guy would have more success than a great looking 5’9 guy....stats where the women are just going to assume the man is the same and the only difference is in height.You are increasing your attractiveness by MORE THAN DOUBLE by increasing ur height by 3 inches. AKA having 50% of more women view you as a datable option
A Virgil Van Dijk fan. True lad