Good Base for Looksmaxxing

Shodredux

Shodredux

Silver
Joined
Jan 14, 2020
Posts
543
Reputation
506
FaceandLMS talks about how you need a "good base" inorder for looksmaxxing to work. But what is a good base ? Can it be defined in terms of ratios and proportions? Or is it just harmony? Can you define a good base with measurements like fwhr, midface ratio , es ratio etc???
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel and stuckneworleans
Not having masisve unfixable failos
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, stuckneworleans, Bennett and 13 others
Decent pheno and ratios. Rest doesnt matter.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6485b025t, thecel and Shodredux
Decent lower third, decent height, not having many or any massive unfixable failos
 
Faceandlms has to be the worst and most cope channel in youtube. Clueless about attractiveness, women and real life.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deusmaximus and Kade
FaceandLMS talks about how you need a "good base" inorder for looksmaxxing to work. But what is a good base ? Can it be defined in terms of ratios and proportions? Or is it just harmony? Can you define a good base with measurements like fwhr, midface ratio , es ratio etc???
ipd = harmony
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2933
A bare minimum base is 3 PSL at worst. A decent one would be 4 to 4.5 PSL.
 
Base is a meme, just fix each one od your failos and gl
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NormieKilla
A bad base is something like... you have good features, but you still look shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexanderr and LordGodcat
It’s totally subjective and based on the individuals funds and willingness to undergo procedures.

Example: if you have a very narrow IPD, technically you don’t have a good base, andfor a while it’s just been accepted that there’s nothing you can do about it, because the procedure to fix it, OBO, is invasive, risky, and we didn’t know of surgeons who would ever take on non-deformed patients for it. The reality is I know of 2-3 doctors who would in fact operate OBO on cosmetic cases, and 2 of them happen to be among the most experienced craniofacial (not just maxillofacial) surgeons in the world. The problem? Cost. As well as the patient actually being willing to undergo something that invasive in the first place. But if you have the money, as well as the willpower, even something considered a death sentence for a looksmaxing base can be addressed. The problem is not even 1% of looksmaxers likely fall into this category.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6485b025t, I'mme, Kade and 1 other person
A bad base is something like... you have good features, but you still look shit
@HorribleTeeth lol




__________________________________________
A good base
-normal or low cranial base angle
-normal- good midface ratio
- normal - good IPD
- normal - good neuro to splanchocranium ratio
- skull height and width (width ear to ear distance, not bizygomatic)
- normal - good phenotype
- normal - good supras
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Shodredux and Deleted member 1464
It’s totally subjective and based on the individuals funds and willingness to undergo procedures.

Example: if you have a very narrow IPD, technically you don’t have a good base, andfor a while it’s just been accepted that there’s nothing you can do about it, because the procedure to fix it, OBO, is invasive, risky, and we didn’t know of surgeons who would ever take on non-deformed patients for it. The reality is I know of 2-3 doctors who would in fact operate OBO on cosmetic cases, and 2 of them happen to be among the most experienced craniofacial (not just maxillofacial) surgeons in the world. The problem? Cost. As well as the patient actually being willing to undergo something that invasive in the first place. But if you have the money, as well as the willpower, even something considered a death sentence for a looksmaxing base can be addressed. The problem is not even 1% of looksmaxers likely fall into this category.
IPD :soy::soy::soy:
Original
Wenn5950189 46 2899 1
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Shodredux
being over 178cm

psl 4 to start with

not having completely f**ked hormone profile

decent wrist/ankle size/clavicle width
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel and Patient A
being over 178cm

psl 4 to start with

not having completely f**ked hormone profile

decent wrist/ankle size/clavicle width
Wrist pill tbh
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 4209
Yeah I meant narrower than that, or someone who doesn’t have nice eyes (good PFL, good medial canthus, nice lashes) and also has narrow IPD.
Ian got 55mm, Zayn 56.5-7
They are below first percentile.
If someone doesnt have nice eyes then its better to focus on this and stop coping with ipd because its meme. I can name countless very gl, model tier males with ipd below 10th percentile.
 
Ian got 55mm, Zayn 56.5-7
They are below first percentile.
If someone doesnt have nice eyes then its better to focus on this and stop coping with ipd because its meme. I can name countless very gl, model tier males with ipd below 10th percentile.
Then forget IPD and consider vertical orbital dystopia. The same fix for dramatic orbital dystopia (which is a good base killer) would be OBO.
 
Yeah, show me one user here who have extremely close set eyes like that. There is no point of morphing MMs who have normal proportions and making them more than deformed. Lol.
Then forget IPD and consider vertical orbital dystopia. The same fix for dramatic orbital dystopia (which is a good base killer) would be OBO.
Yeah im sure if Ian Somerhalder posted here his pic no one would notice he got 55ish ipd lol.
Its lack of good ratios and features which make you ugly. Narrower ipd in 99% cases means smaller head.
 
Yeah, show me one user here who have extremely close set eyes like that. There is no point of morphing MMs who have normal proportions and making them more than deformed. Lol.

Yeah im sure if Ian Somerhalder posted here his pic no one would notice he got 55ish ipd lol.
Its lack of good ratios and features which make you ugly. Narrower ipd in 99% cases means smaller head.
@eyes


and also imo Ian is a fag
 
@HorribleTeeth lol




__________________________________________
A good base
-normal or low cranial base angle
-normal- good midface ratio
- normal - good IPD
- normal - good neuro to splanchocranium ratio
- skull height and width (width ear to ear distance, not bizygomatic)
- normal - good phenotype
- normal - good supras
What is ear to ear distance?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shodredux
Then forget IPD and consider vertical orbital dystopia. The same fix for dramatic orbital dystopia (which is a good base killer) would be OBO.
Yeah im sure if Ian Somerhalder posted here his pic no one would notice he got 55ish ipd lol.
Its lack of good ratios and features which make you ugly. Narrower ipd in 99% cases means smaller head.

Reread what I said and realize you didn’t address any of it.
 
you can increase your width of your splanchocranium easily by surgery, but not the width of your neurocranium
I never hear ear to ear distance? Mine is around 7.5 inches? Is that bad?
 
you can increase your width of your splanchocranium easily by surgery, but not the width of your neurocranium
Jfl my neurocranium is way wider than rest.
 
I never hear ear to ear distance? Mine is around 7.5 inches? Is that bad?
because most PSLers are superficial

you could consider it as posterior Bizygomatic
 
But you could also have low tier normie face with no major failos but still looks bad
Yes, but as long as you have a good base (not having major unfixable flaws), you’ll still be able to improve your looks by a lot by softmaxxing or getting surgeries for example.
Base is a meme, just fix each one od your failos and gl
That’s implying each failo is fixable.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NormieKilla and Shodredux
A bad base is something like... you have good features, but you still look shit
I’d consider a bad basing being below average and having unfixable failos which will restrict the amount you can improve your looks regardless of getting surgeries.
 
A very good base would be someone like me
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, NormieKilla, Deleted member 2661 and 1 other person
as long as your splancho is wide too, then it is ok

ear to ear distance is head breadth (or bizygomatic if your splancho is wider)
What to do if my neurocranium is way wider?
 
normal on westerners

wider splanchocranium = wide-faced and athletic slayer
But i meant. My neurocranium is way wider than splanchocranium. It makes my forehead look big. I fraud it with hair.
 
Not having a low fwhr.
Not having a low IPD.
Not having a long midface (specifically too long a nose)
Not having too wide IPD.
Not having a bad phenotype (dark as hell Indian)
Not being a complete manlet.
Not having a shit frame.
Not having a bad eye area.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shodredux
Not having a low fwhr.
Not having a low IPD.
Not having a long midface (specifically too long a nose)
Not having too wide IPD.
Not having a bad phenotype (dark as hell Indian)
Not being a complete manlet.
Not having a shit frame.
Not having a bad eye area.
good mouth area is necessary, second feature we look at after eyes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NormieKilla, Shodredux and LordNorwood
All of this is cope; unless you look like this then with a good amount of surgery you can ascend
 

Attachments

  • 9F0D079D-AEEE-48A7-AC4B-DF904FE087EB.png
    9F0D079D-AEEE-48A7-AC4B-DF904FE087EB.png
    78.7 KB · Views: 38
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: NormieKilla and LordNorwood

Similar threads

thetrue_rater
Replies
13
Views
421
thetrue_rater
thetrue_rater
UtahParentCenterPSL
Replies
6
Views
119
UtahParentCenterPSL
UtahParentCenterPSL
DonaldJTrump
Replies
34
Views
519
savemebimax
savemebimax
M
Replies
9
Views
503
Mansur
M

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top