idk. calculate it bro
what I mean is
Nope I didn’t put my fingers straight
They are the same length.
caluclate ratio. idr how. divide someting
You're fucking retarded
elab
"just an association" my ass. There's literally hundreds of studies talking about links and we already know what the link is. And the point in the first place was literally that PT influences finger lengths which is why ratios differ in the first place.
So, what is the link?
Lol it's over for pajeets
T.digit ratio 2
Prenatal hormonal profile influences finger lengths which is a wide known fact. There's most likely a stage in pregnancy where fingers get influenced. The fact there's so many studies showing a link shows it's a good indicator of overall hormonal profile during pregnancy
So there is no link? A link and saying that this is a fact would imply you know the mechanisms trough which it happens.
What the fuck are you on about? I talked about the link of 2d4d-ratio and prenatal testosterone/it's effects like facial masculinisation
???
how long is your nose?
4 inches
You can say there is a link between Insulin Sensitivity and Exercise. Then there is the mechanisms trough which that happens, that is the increased level of Catecholamines in the blood leading to increased Glycolysis which leads to an activation an AMPK due to lowered Glycogen energy stores which will make you more Insulin Sensitive since you now have enough space to store that Gylcogen trough Insulin.
Not gonna bother reading all of that. You clearly understood my point and it's generally not cope but of course there's always cracks in the system. Debunk this while you're at it:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I'll have to correct myself with association instead of link but my point still stands it's a strong association
Yes this is what I meant, that it is an association and no known mechanics trough which that happens.
Ofc it doesn't tell everything and the only 100% accurate way would be measuring maternal testosterone levels during every stage of pregnancy which isn't really practical, but saying it's just an association seems a bit retarded when there's so many studies on it
I have read a lot of other papers, and at least when it came to things I understood, there were a lot of things being ommited, things gotten completely wrong either because the writer is retarded or on purpose, misinterpreted results, things being pulled out of the writers ass, etc. so unless I read them I can't say anything about their validity
Where's your avi?
Which bro? I'm looking for a new one
Will do
