good genes do not come in package

[LefortCandidate]

most scientist today are ugly as fuck but has high iq

most scientists that advanced humanity in the past range from subhuman and mtn

this cope about looks and high iq and good genes come in package is so fucking dumb

ive seen somebody unironically said men shouldn't try to limit hypergamy because women will select for high iq jfl

some people are jus naive enough to think that women will chose Einstein over jeremy meeks who has like 60 iq

 

[stonecold trucel]

true

 

[lnceIs]

Cope

 

[Hess]

Good genes and good looks arent rly the same thing imo, there is a correlation to a degree but not merely enough to make it a law with a few exceptions

 

[LefortCandidate]

Good genes and good looks arent rly the same thing imo, there is a correlation to a degree but not merely enough to make it a law with a few exceptions

both looks and iq are genetics mayne

people thinking letting hypergamy go unchecked is a good eugenic program but that's not true

 

[thedarkerone]

most scientist today are ugly as fuck but has high iq

most scientists that advanced humanity in the past range from subhuman and mtn

this cope about looks and high iq and good genes come in package is so fucking dumb

ive seen somebody unironically said men shouldn't try to limit hypergamy because women will select for high iq jfl

some people are jus naive enough to think that women will chose Einstein over jeremy meeks who has like 60 iq

Cope

Good genes and good looks arent rly the same thing imo, there is a correlation to a degree but not merely enough to make it a law with a few exceptions

letting women pick their partners is the opposite of eugenic, their choices are way more often brutally dysgenic than they are eugenic but the kids on this site arent ready to hear that

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

Good genes and good looks arent rly the same thing imo, there is a correlation to a degree but not merely enough to make it a law with a few exceptions

genetic recomb is law

 

[LefortCandidate]

genetic recomb is law

that's cope as well

 

[Hess]

both looks and iq are genetics mayne

people thinking letting hypergamy go unchecked is a good eugenic program but that's not true

True eugenics is only possible with manual intervention imo i agree with you

 

[Hess]

letting women pick their partners is the opposite of eugenic, their choices are way more often brutally dysgenic than they are eugenic but the kids on this site arent ready to hear that

I agree with that though

 

[Divineincel]

most scientist today are ugly as fuck but has high iq

most scientists that advanced humanity in the past range from subhuman and mtn

this cope about looks and high iq and good genes come in package is so fucking dumb

ive seen somebody unironically said men shouldn't try to limit hypergamy because women will select for high iq jfl

some people are jus naive enough to think that women will chose Einstein over jeremy meeks who has like 60 iq

Watch your mouth boy, Jeremy Meeks shall inherit the world one day, it was even prophesied in the Bible

 

[shandingo]

most scientist today are ugly as fuck but has high iq

most scientists that advanced humanity in the past range from subhuman and mtn

this cope about looks and high iq and good genes come in package is so fucking dumb

ive seen somebody unironically said men shouldn't try to limit hypergamy because women will select for high iq jfl

some people are jus naive enough to think that women will chose Einstein over jeremy meeks who has like 60 iq

What you said is true to an extent. However , I think there still is a weak positive correlation. Good looks are health markers , likely to be raised by wealthy parents ( positive IQ correlation with wealth ) with good nutrition. There is a reason your parents income and education is directly correlated with yours , so is there IQ (not always the case). There are plenty of low IQ chads and high IQ sub-5s hence why it is a weak correlation I am suggesting.

 

[trvechud]

most scientist today are ugly as fuck but has high iq

most scientists that advanced humanity in the past range from subhuman and mtn

this cope about looks and high iq and good genes come in package is so fucking dumb

ive seen somebody unironically said men shouldn't try to limit hypergamy because women will select for high iq jfl

some people are jus naive enough to think that women will chose Einstein over jeremy meeks who has like 60 iq

Scientists are ugly because attractive people of similar iq got better jobs with less effort/more pay than stem

 

[Whatever]

They don’t even come in packages as far as looks. A lot of the prettiest eye areas I’ve ever seen was on girls with recessed lower thirds. Also a lot of the girls with the best bodies have chopped faces, even my mom has said stuff like that.

A lot of guys with great faces are short. Or maybe he has a great face and is tall but his voice is really annoying and foids get the ick from it. Genetic recomb is like rolling a million dice at once, some of which are from centuries ago. So full package Chads are very rare, most guys are missing something and foids compromise in their selection somehow.

 

[Jorad]

Dolph Lundgren​

 

[LefortCandidate]

What you said is true to an extent. However , I think there still is a weak positive correlation. Good looks are health markers , likely to be raised by wealthy parents ( positive IQ correlation with wealth ) with good nutrition. There is a reason your parents income and education is directly correlated with yours , so is there IQ (not always the case). There are plenty of low IQ chads and high IQ sub-5s hence why it is a weak correlation I am suggesting.

i would argue high iq individuals comes from low income famillies

i am talking about real high iq people that contribute to societies not just smart enough to keep family wealth going

there's a reason why the come up stories are popular

 

[Whatever]

Dolph Lundgren​

This isn’t about one in a billion celebrity giga Chads, this is about normal people you know IRL.

 

[LefortCandidate]

Dolph Lundgren​

He's the exception that started this idea on bp spaces

 

[shandingo]

i would argue high iq individuals comes from low income famillies

i am talking about real high iq people that contribute to societies not just smart enough to keep family wealth going

there's a reason why the come up stories are popular

Interesting point but I can only speak with the data. Data shows the vast majority of candidates from top universities Harvard , MIT , Oxford etc... are extremely elitist. Your parents income is the best predictor of your income. You are correct the guys who make it from nothing are the most impressive , but this is like 0.0001% of the population. Most people stay in their social class.

The smartest people on Earth are the researchers and scientists at top universities and institutions operating on the cutting edge of their interested subject physics , math , computer science etc... Almost all of these type of people come from wealthy families. There are probably high IQ individuals born into 3rd world poverty but you will never see their data point unfortunately.