illusion
Forefront of the Anti-Rotter Movement
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2024
- Posts
- 1,152
- Reputation
- 9,691
If you’ve ever seen an attractive person, chances are, they were also tall, maybe they also had a good voice, and they were charismatic and smart.
This is a real phenomenon that has been touched on many blackpill enthusiasts over the years, commonly referred to through the saying “good genes come in a package.”
But why? And how? How can all the good genes be grouped together? Well it’s scientific. Firstly we have to acknowledge that there is objective good and bad genes. The alleles that make a man short are inferior in every form to the ones that make him tall. The genes that make a symmetric face are superior to ones that leave it up to environment. The genes for lighter eyes are superior to the ones for dark eyes, you get the idea.
We are all drawn to better looking people, the only thing subjective about looks is desired archetype (some women find a robust Prettyboy more appealing, some enjoy a maesthetic man, others enjoy a Dom, thread coming soon on this as well!) but past archetype, there is nothing subjective about looks. No matter the archetype, the ratios remain the same.
So since we’re all objectively drawn to these good looking people, and all humans share the same nature, this creates an environment where all the good genes are grouped into a specific population, one where both the parents have good genetics and therefore, genetic recombination has a higher chance of creating someone who is both tall, attractive, smart, and sociable. This can be seen in basically every Chad. If you were to search up almost any famous good looking person, chances are that they are “coincidentally” 5’10 - 6’0+. Let’s look at the best example of this:
This is Tyler Maher, a British model who is lesser known to normies. He is facially, one of the most attractive people alive. He is also light eyed, and 6’4+. His traits weren’t a mere “coincidence,” he was always destined to be good looking due to the superior genetic recombination possibilities that were provided to him by his parents. To simplify, there was never a chance he ended up as tall but unattractive, or attractive but tall. It was always going to be grouped together.
This isn’t just limited to Maher, we are scientifically proven to guess/estimate height subconsciously just based on facial structure.
A tall skull, known to be the #1 feature to have as a base for attractiveness, is overwhelmingly correlated with being tall. In studies that were done, people that were taller showed to have more elongated, oval skulls as compared to the short, round skull average people have. This same study also proved that a taller skull correlates to perceived better leadership ability, among other things. To simplify once again, taller people are genetically predisposed to having tall skulls that are viewed as a massive positive to normies. Tall skull = enhanced perceived leadership ability.(Source)
_____
Does this mean that tall people can’t be ugly or short people can’t be attractive? Of course not. There are many cases of subhuman tallcels or attractive manlets, however this doesn’t change the general average which shows that better traits are correlated with each other. And unfortunately, this doesn’t just come in small groups, there’s entire countries that adhere to this.
Pictured above are the faces of Northern and Northwestern Europe. These are phenotypes, which are bare averages of the population. As you can see, every single one of them are good looking, ranging from MTN - HTN. Most phenotypes are in the LTN range, meaning these people average an entire deviation above in average attractiveness.
And if you know anything about Northern Europe, you’ll also know that Northern Europeans are roughly 185 - 191cm on average. (6’1 - 6’3.) This means that in populations, especially within Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands, there are massive populations of MMTN+ 6’0 men on average, this doesn’t even account for the people slightly or strongly above average which is 25% of the total population.
This is by no means of exaggeration, I have friends who live in Northern Europe and I have gone myself, this isn’t exaggerated whatsoever. The average man there is tall and good looking.
Northern Europeans also have the highest SMV on average, they are desired by every single population on Earth.
This means that there is an entire part of the world where people are simply born with the life many here dream of handed to them, not individuals, an actual subcontinental population (millions upon millions of people.)
They have the best traits all grouped together, light eyes, tall stature, attractive face. Good genetics come in a package.
________
So again, how does this work? How is it that all the good genes are concentrated into one group/population? How is it that tall people are better looking on average? How is it that attractive people are taller on average?
Well human beings are inherently self centered and they desire their looksmatch more than a partner of their “type.” This means that someone is more likely to get with a partner because they are perceived by society as a whole as “high status” than a partner that they personally find attractive.
Over time, through generations, this cycle concentrates the limited genetic traits (light eyes, tall alleles, high iq) into a single population because the top people only bred with people on their level or higher. So essentially, the tall people get with facially attractive people, and this cycle continues over and over again until the human race’s entire density of attractive people is also tall, smart, and incredibly neurotypical.
_____
I don’t have a good way to end off this thread, so I’ll just throw in some photos to solidify the point:
“Muh bluepill”
@Sayori @Jgns @Pony @Hernan
@AustrianMogger I made this thread with you in mind, enjoy.
This is a real phenomenon that has been touched on many blackpill enthusiasts over the years, commonly referred to through the saying “good genes come in a package.”
But why? And how? How can all the good genes be grouped together? Well it’s scientific. Firstly we have to acknowledge that there is objective good and bad genes. The alleles that make a man short are inferior in every form to the ones that make him tall. The genes that make a symmetric face are superior to ones that leave it up to environment. The genes for lighter eyes are superior to the ones for dark eyes, you get the idea.
We are all drawn to better looking people, the only thing subjective about looks is desired archetype (some women find a robust Prettyboy more appealing, some enjoy a maesthetic man, others enjoy a Dom, thread coming soon on this as well!) but past archetype, there is nothing subjective about looks. No matter the archetype, the ratios remain the same.
So since we’re all objectively drawn to these good looking people, and all humans share the same nature, this creates an environment where all the good genes are grouped into a specific population, one where both the parents have good genetics and therefore, genetic recombination has a higher chance of creating someone who is both tall, attractive, smart, and sociable. This can be seen in basically every Chad. If you were to search up almost any famous good looking person, chances are that they are “coincidentally” 5’10 - 6’0+. Let’s look at the best example of this:
This is Tyler Maher, a British model who is lesser known to normies. He is facially, one of the most attractive people alive. He is also light eyed, and 6’4+. His traits weren’t a mere “coincidence,” he was always destined to be good looking due to the superior genetic recombination possibilities that were provided to him by his parents. To simplify, there was never a chance he ended up as tall but unattractive, or attractive but tall. It was always going to be grouped together.
This isn’t just limited to Maher, we are scientifically proven to guess/estimate height subconsciously just based on facial structure.
A tall skull, known to be the #1 feature to have as a base for attractiveness, is overwhelmingly correlated with being tall. In studies that were done, people that were taller showed to have more elongated, oval skulls as compared to the short, round skull average people have. This same study also proved that a taller skull correlates to perceived better leadership ability, among other things. To simplify once again, taller people are genetically predisposed to having tall skulls that are viewed as a massive positive to normies. Tall skull = enhanced perceived leadership ability.(Source)
_____
Does this mean that tall people can’t be ugly or short people can’t be attractive? Of course not. There are many cases of subhuman tallcels or attractive manlets, however this doesn’t change the general average which shows that better traits are correlated with each other. And unfortunately, this doesn’t just come in small groups, there’s entire countries that adhere to this.
Pictured above are the faces of Northern and Northwestern Europe. These are phenotypes, which are bare averages of the population. As you can see, every single one of them are good looking, ranging from MTN - HTN. Most phenotypes are in the LTN range, meaning these people average an entire deviation above in average attractiveness.
And if you know anything about Northern Europe, you’ll also know that Northern Europeans are roughly 185 - 191cm on average. (6’1 - 6’3.) This means that in populations, especially within Sweden, Denmark, and the Netherlands, there are massive populations of MMTN+ 6’0 men on average, this doesn’t even account for the people slightly or strongly above average which is 25% of the total population.
This is by no means of exaggeration, I have friends who live in Northern Europe and I have gone myself, this isn’t exaggerated whatsoever. The average man there is tall and good looking.
Northern Europeans also have the highest SMV on average, they are desired by every single population on Earth.
This means that there is an entire part of the world where people are simply born with the life many here dream of handed to them, not individuals, an actual subcontinental population (millions upon millions of people.)
They have the best traits all grouped together, light eyes, tall stature, attractive face. Good genetics come in a package.
________
So again, how does this work? How is it that all the good genes are concentrated into one group/population? How is it that tall people are better looking on average? How is it that attractive people are taller on average?
Well human beings are inherently self centered and they desire their looksmatch more than a partner of their “type.” This means that someone is more likely to get with a partner because they are perceived by society as a whole as “high status” than a partner that they personally find attractive.
Over time, through generations, this cycle concentrates the limited genetic traits (light eyes, tall alleles, high iq) into a single population because the top people only bred with people on their level or higher. So essentially, the tall people get with facially attractive people, and this cycle continues over and over again until the human race’s entire density of attractive people is also tall, smart, and incredibly neurotypical.
_____
I don’t have a good way to end off this thread, so I’ll just throw in some photos to solidify the point:
“Muh bluepill”
@Sayori @Jgns @Pony @Hernan
@AustrianMogger I made this thread with you in mind, enjoy.
