Good-looking features =/ Caucasian features

[Ocelot]

I've seen so many brainlet copers, most recently @MaxillaIsEverything say X ethnic is GL only because he has Caucasian features, in an attempt to cope, unable to stomach the fact that people of any race can be GL.

Not being recessed, or being tall, isn't a Caucasian trait. Even if it's predominant in them, it's not a trait exclusive to them, or something that necessitates recent white ancestry.

0 white ancestry btw
inb4 "muh exceptions prove the norm "

It could just as easily be said that plump lips are an "ethnic trait," and that whites who have good lips are descended from ethnics.
but no, this whole "XYZ race traits" is sub-zero IQ classification in looks theory, you can be a white with good lips, or an ethnic with a low-set browridge, etc. Genetics is too complex to just put a bunch of traits and attribute them to different races, and then attempt to apply that to people because everyone is mixed to an extent, and development plays a huge role.

Caucasians have on average better, harder to chew diets and a culture that encourages sports, hence on average, yes, they are better looking compared to the malnourished farmer in India. The average height of an ethnic from a well-developed region is at the very least equal to that of whites.

Let's say I'm wrong for the sake of argument.
Then how's that white ancestry helping you

- Posts a picture of Matt Lemond
"Reminder that you ethnics will never look like this, keep crying for my BWC jfl at you"

dn rd or similar commenters will automatically be assumed as 0 iqcels who can't understand simple reasoning

@Biggdink @Gosick @Golang

tag more coping recessed subhumans below

 

[BradAniston]

Agree but dn rd

 

[Ocelot]

Agree but dn rd

dn rd or similar commenters will automatically be assumed as 0 iqcels who can't understand simple reasoning

over

 

[Deleted member 4430]

dn read
maxilla is everything

 

[Ocelot]

dn read
maxilla is everything

indeed

 

[AbandonShip]

OP is a rape victim

 

[Deleted member 10104]

Prove that man is not classified as caucasoid

Are you such a brainlet that you didn't know some blacks can be caucasoid?

 

[Ocelot]

Prove that man is not classified as caucasoid

Are you such a brainlet that you didn't know some blacks can be caucasoid?

He's from a fucking indigenous tribe.

Don't even try to use mental gymnastics. You still didn't answer any of the other points I made either. kys

 

[Deleted member 7863]

dn read
maxilla is everything

Im gonna Fuck you

 

[Deleted member 10104]

He's from a fucking indigenous tribe.

Don't even try to use mental gymnastics. You still didn't answer any of the other points I made either. kys

Do you think Caucasoid = white?

Arabs and Semites are both caucasoid.

 

[Deleted member 6873]

dn read
maxilla is everything

lifefuel

 

[AbandonShip]

 

[Deleted member 10104]

I've seen so many brainlet copers, most recently @MaxillaIsEverything say X ethnic is GL only because he has Caucasian features, in an attempt to cope, unable to stomach the fact that people of any race can be GL.

Not being recessed, or being tall, isn't a Caucasian trait. Even if it's predominant in them, it's not a trait exclusive to them, or something that necessitates recent white ancestry.

View attachment 779861
0 white ancestry btw
inb4 "muh exceptions prove the norm "

It could just as easily be said that plump lips are an "ethnic trait," and that whites who have good lips are descended from ethnics.
but no, this whole "XYZ race traits" is sub-zero IQ classification in looks theory, you can be a white with good lips, or an ethnic with a low-set browridge, etc. Genetics is too complex to just put a bunch of traits and attribute them to different races, and then attempt to apply that to people because everyone is mixed to an extent, and development plays a huge role.

Caucasians have on average better, harder to chew diets and a culture that encourages sports, hence on average, yes, they are better looking compared to the malnourished farmer in India. The average height of an ethnic from a well-developed region is at the very least equal to that of whites.

Let's say I'm wrong for the sake of argument.
Then how's that white ancestry helping you
View attachment 779896
- Posts a picture of Matt Lemond
"Reminder that you ethnics will never look like this, keep crying for my BWC jfl at you"

dn rd or similar commenters will automatically be assumed as 0 iqcels who can't understand simple reasoning

@Biggdink @Gosick @Golang

tag more coping recessed subhumans below

Besides, he may have bones but be honest about his appeal

 

[goat2x]

Can u idiots finally realize that we call it caucasian features bc its usually more appearent in caucasians? No one said other races cant have it

 

[goat2x]

Can u idiots finally realize that we call it caucasian features bc its usually more appearent in caucasians? No one said other races cant have it

Its like saying nordics are the tallest and you debunk it by posting a tall indian because indians can be tall too

 

[Deleted member 7651]

Cherry picking at its best , all the black immigrants i see are bonless .
And so are whites who drink water with E tbh

 

[redhandsbluehands]

Would low set but extremely prominent and protruding, wide and high mass cheekbones be considered a caucasian feature?

like this but more low set and closer to the mouth

 

[Ocelot]

Can u idiots finally realize that we call it caucasian features bc its usually more appearent in caucasians? No one said other races cant have it

Is wealth a Caucasian trait? Casinos a Monaco trait?

Just because something is common to something doesn't make it "their's"
Go back to researching on some weird shit no one cares about.

 

[goat2x]

Is wealth a Caucasian trait? Casinos a Monaco trait?

Just because something is common to something doesn't make it "their's"
Go back to researching on some weird shit no one cares about.

Why are crying faggot? Are you mad cuz i debunked your shit? Its generalizing thats why.
Your comparisons are shit btw the one i posted is far better.
When we say someone has caucasian features we refer to them being more appearent in Caucasians.
Go back to making low iq race threads

 

[Ocelot]

When we say someone has caucasian features we refer to them being more appearent in Caucasians.

fact that you can't comprehend that this logic is flawed and you decided to use it shows me how fucking stupid you are

 

[goat2x]

fact that you can't comprehend that this logic is flawed and you decided to use it shows me how fucking stupid you are

Who said that i use this you fucking idiot
I just said ppl usually refer to this, is it accurate? No, Is it true? Yes.

 

[Ocelot]

Who said that i use this you fucking idiot
I just said ppl usually refer to this, is it accurate? No, Is it true? Yes.

Backtrack more.
You used it to justify why xyz traits are to be considered Caucasians.

 

[SadnessWYJ]

OP is a rape victim

 

[goat2x]

Backtrack more.
You used it to justify why xyz traits are to be considered Caucasians.

because they are considered to be holy shit at this iq
because some of you dumbasses think only caucasians can have them
never said that it is accurate, but its true.

 

[Deleted member 10104]

because they are considered to be holy shit at this iq
because some of you dumbasses think only caucasians can have them
never said that it is accurate, but its true.

He's the same type of person to cope by saying something like "monolids aren't an Asian feature! Just cause some Asians have them doesn't mean it's an mongoloid trait!"

IIgnore him

 

[SadnessWYJ]

Before everything, define Caucasia

 

[Ocelot]

He's the same type of person to cope by saying something like "monolids aren't an Asian feature! Just cause some Asians have them doesn't mean it's an mongoloid trait!"

IIgnore him

I never claimed there are no discernable differences between races, you absolute retard.
I was specifically talking about features that make one attractive.
Are forward grown jaws a Caucasian trait, when anyone can have one if they had proper development? Maxilla? Height? etc.

Before everything, define Caucasia

Racial classification is loose and outdated anyway. Before you think I'm dodging your question, idk, because there is no set-in-stone definition anyway.

The point is we're all the same species and minor genetic differences arose due to millenia of different developmental conditions and interbreeding. So, on an individual level, it's useless. We use it for simplicity's sake.

 

[Deleted member 10104]

I never claimed there are no discernable differences between races, you absolute retard.
I was specifically talking about features that make one attractive.
Are forward grown jaws a Caucasian trait, when anyone can have one if they had proper development? Maxilla? Height? etc.

Racial classification is loose and outdated anyway. Before you think I'm dodging your question, idk, because there is no set-in-stone definition anyway.

The point is we're all the same species and minor genetic differences arose due to millenia of different developmental conditions and interbreeding. So, on an individual level, it's useless. We use it for simplicity's sake.

Yes actually retard, scientists studied this 70+ years ago and actually did decide a forward grown mandible + maxilla was a Caucasian trait.

Caucasian race - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

AAlso note the part that says they can identify a Caucasoid skull with 90% accuracy.

Also, even non Asians can have monolids. It's still an Asian trait.

Exceptions don't disprove the rule. Hurrrr did you know some people have 6 fingers per hand instead of 5? Guess humans don't have 5 fingers per hand after all!

 

[Deleted member 9837]

You guys always do this.

some traits are universal due to proper nutrition and development and horomones as a human.

wide jaws and forward growth and fwhr go to all races due to male natural ideal development

some traits like more protruding browbones are a more prevalent Caucasoid trait. But caucasoid isn’t just white op which you’ve been corrected on.

their are racial differences yes but if your trying to say that key factors in human attractiveness only are white your terrible misjudged

 

[wasted]

- Posts a picture of Matt Lemond

 

[Ocelot]

Yes actually retard, scientists studied this 70+ years ago and actually did decide a forward grown mandible + maxilla was a Caucasian trait.

source = trust me bro

AAlso note the part that says they can identify a Caucasoid skull with 90% accuracy.

Also, even non Asians can have monolids. It's still an Asian trait.

Exceptions don't disprove the rule. Hurrrr did you know some people have 6 fingers per hand instead of 5? Guess humans don't have 5 fingers per hand after all!

Brainlet analogy, I was saying that GL features are found in all races, and I didn't merely post an exception, that people would then respond to by saying "the exception proves the norm."

I'm not arguing over monolids or shit because you seem too fucking stupid to comprehend that I agreed that some traits, like monolids, are more common in some races than others, but when it comes to features that contribute to attractiveness, they are in a lot of people's genetic potential, and being white is not a prereq.

You guys always do this.

some traits are universal due to proper nutrition and development and horomones as a human.

wide jaws and forward growth and fwhr go to all races due to male natural ideal development

some traits like more protruding browbones are a more prevalent Caucasoid trait. But caucasoid isn’t just white op which you’ve been corrected on.

their are racial differences yes but if your trying to say that key factors in human attractiveness only are white your terrible misjudged

I never claimed Caucasoid = only white.
I literally mentioned that everyone is mixed to an extent, so yes, "Caucasian" genes (again, racial classification isn't used in biology for this reason, that you can't ascribe traits based on race accurately) are in other populations too.

"their are racial differences yes but if your trying to say that key factors in human attractiveness only are white your terrible misjudged"

this is what I'm trying to explain

 

[john2]

I'm not even gonna fast read your thread, that's how dumb it is, unfortunately.

 

[Deleted member 9288]

 

[Deleted member 10104]

source = trust me bro

Brainlet analogy, I was saying that GL features are found in all races, and I didn't merely post an exception, that people would then respond to by saying "the exception proves the norm."

I'm not arguing over monolids or shit because you seem too fucking stupid to comprehend that I agreed that some traits, like monolids, are more common in some races than others, but when it comes to features that contribute to attractiveness, they are in a lot of people's genetic potential, and being white is not a prereq.

I never claimed Caucasoid = only white.
I literally mentioned that everyone is mixed to an extent, so yes, "Caucasian" genes (again, racial classification isn't used in biology for this reason, that you can't ascribe traits based on race accurately) are in other populations too.

"their are racial differences yes but if your trying to say that key factors in human attractiveness only are white your terrible misjudged"

this is what I'm trying to explain

I LITERALLY INCLUDED THE SOURCE BACKING WHAT I SAID JFL JUST CLICK IT AND READ

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Prove that man is not classified as caucasoid

Are you such a brainlet that you didn't know some blacks can be caucasoid?

He is Maasai jfl. That's not caucasoid lol

 

[Alexanderr]

It’s still astounding to me some people believe caucasian features are exclusive to whites. They aren’t and they’ve never been.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Can u idiots finally realize that we call it caucasian features bc its usually more appearent in caucasians? No one said other races cant have it

That mf has no caucasoid features.

Rounded forehead, low rounded high mass cheeckbones, prothgnatic, thick lips, round chin etc

 

[Deleted member 5818]

It’s still astounding to me some people believe caucasian features are exclusive to whites. They aren’t and they’ve never been.

caucasian features = white features

no one believes they're just exclusive to whites... but ofc there more predominant in whites because they're literally white features jfl

 

[Ocelot]

I LITERALLY INCLUDED THE SOURCE BACKING WHAT I SAID JFL JUST CLICK IT AND READ

nowhere does it say that caucasians have more forward grown mandibles and maxillae

everyone's missing the point of this thread

 

[Ocelot]

I'm not even gonna fast read your thread, that's how dumb it is, unfortunately.

immensely useful contribution thanks

 

[Alexanderr]

caucasian features = white features

Nope, usually when people here refer to “white features”, they’re referring to caucasoid features.

Prominent supraorbital ridges, narrow, long high bridged nasal bones, small mouths, narrow nasal cavities, little or no prognathism, straight profile etc...

All are found in the indigenous people of Europe, North Africa, Horn of Africa, South West Asia and the Indian subcontinent.

Caucasoid is used as an umbrella term for phenotypically similar groups from these different regions, with a focus on skeletal anatomy, and especially cranial morphology, without regard to skin tone.

Again, these physical traits are not exclusive to people hailing from Europe, as they’re very common in lots of other people.

 

[Deleted member 5818]

Nope, usually when people here refer to “white features”, they’re referring to caucasoid features.

Prominent supraorbital ridges, narrow, long high bridged nasal bones, small mouths, narrow nasal cavities, little or no prognathism, straight profile etc...

All are found in the indigenous people of Europe, North Africa, Horn of Africa, South West Asia and the Indian subcontinent.

Caucasoid is used as an umbrella term for phenotypically similar groups from these different regions, with a focus on skeletal anatomy, and especially cranial morphology, without regard to skin tone.

Again, these physical traits are not exclusive to people hailing from Europe, as they’re very common in lots of other people.

View attachment 780017

I agree with you, but I don't think anyone thinks it's exclusive to whites tho,

 

[Deleted member 10104]

nowhere does it say that caucasians have more forward grown mandibles and maxillae

everyone's missing the point of this thread

"Caucasoid traits were recognised as: thin nasal aperture ("nose narrow"), a small mouth, facial angle of 100°–90°, and orthognathism, exemplified by what Blumenbach saw in most ancient Greek crania and statues.[47][48] Later anthropologists of the 19th and early 20th century such as Pritchard, Pickering, Broca, Topinard, Morton, Peschel, Seligman, Bean, Ripley, Haddon and Dixon came to recognize other Caucasoid morphological features, such as prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill.[49] "

Orthognathism = the forward growth of the mandible, including maxilla.

Further in the article it discusses how chin project has also been selected for in caucasians.

Not to mention brow ridge and nose bridges

Sorry, some traits that are considered attractive are in fact what would be considered caucasoid. Just admit it.

 

[Alexanderr]

I agree with you, but I don't think anyone thinks it's exclusive to whites tho,

Yeah, but there is this notion going around that the features are only predominant among Europeans (which they’re not), inherently making them a “white feature”, when it’s plain wrong. They’re very common in other places as well.

 

[Ocelot]

"Caucasoid traits were recognised as: thin nasal aperture ("nose narrow"), a small mouth, facial angle of 100°–90°, and orthognathism, exemplified by what Blumenbach saw in most ancient Greek crania and statues.[47][48] Later anthropologists of the 19th and early 20th century such as Pritchard, Pickering, Broca, Topinard, Morton, Peschel, Seligman, Bean, Ripley, Haddon and Dixon came to recognize
Caucasoid morphological features, such as prominent supraorbital ridges and a sharp nasal sill.[49] "

Orthognathism = the forward growth of the mandible, including maxilla.

Further in the article it discusses how chin project has also been selected for in caucasians.

Not to mention brow ridge and nose bridges

Sorry, some traits that are considered attractive are in fact what would be considered caucasoid. Just admit it.

Orthognathism is not forward growth.
the quality or state of not having the lower parts of the face projecting
literally from a dictionary so I don't get shit for source or whatever

 

[Mr.cope]

I've seen so many brainlet copers, most recently @MaxillaIsEverything say X ethnic is GL only because he has Caucasian features, in an attempt to cope, unable to stomach the fact that people of any race can be GL.

Not being recessed, or being tall, isn't a Caucasian trait. Even if it's predominant in them, it's not a trait exclusive to them, or something that necessitates recent white ancestry.

View attachment 779861
0 white ancestry btw
inb4 "muh exceptions prove the norm "

It could just as easily be said that plump lips are an "ethnic trait," and that whites who have good lips are descended from ethnics.
but no, this whole "XYZ race traits" is sub-zero IQ classification in looks theory, you can be a white with good lips, or an ethnic with a low-set browridge, etc. Genetics is too complex to just put a bunch of traits and attribute them to different races, and then attempt to apply that to people because everyone is mixed to an extent, and development plays a huge role.

Caucasians have on average better, harder to chew diets and a culture that encourages sports, hence on average, yes, they are better looking compared to the malnourished farmer in India. The average height of an ethnic from a well-developed region is at the very least equal to that of whites.

Let's say I'm wrong for the sake of argument.
Then how's that white ancestry helping you
View attachment 779896
- Posts a picture of Matt Lemond
"Reminder that you ethnics will never look like this, keep crying for my BWC jfl at you"

dn rd or similar commenters will automatically be assumed as 0 iqcels who can't understand simple reasoning

@Biggdink @Gosick @Golang

tag more coping recessed subhumans below

No maxillary prognathism=caucasoid trait

 

[goat2x]

That mf has no caucasoid features.

Rounded forehead, low rounded high mass cheeckbones, prothgnatic, thick lips, round chin etc

Browridge, his Nose, Eye area, no proghantism(do you know what it is btw?), jaw.
If we are talking about averages these are far more appearent on caucasoid skulls.
ive never said that this man looks pure caucasoid btw

 

[Mr.cope]

No maxillary prognathism=caucasoid trait

Which means what you posted in OP was Caucasoid

 

[Deleted member 10104]

Orthognathism is not forward growth.
the quality or state of not having the lower parts of the face projecting
literally from a dictionary so I don't get shit for source or whatever

That's literally describing forward growth. Over projection is not forward growth.

Stop trying so hard to find evidence supporting your biases and start being unbiased you bluepilled pussy.

 

[johncruz12345]

We have this argument everyday lol.