got my testosterone results back

karbo

karbo

300 iq mastermind sociopath manipulator demi-god
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Posts
8,242
Reputation
17,028
measured at 775ng/dl in an especially depressive state with shit diet and no exercise
its way better than i expected
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: KraftDurchLeid, Chad69, coolguy1 and 6 others
chad. mogs me
 
  • +1
Reactions: karbo
I havent had a boner since over a month
saved some money on the testo test
 
  • +1
Reactions: karbo and Be_ConfidentBro
Way Better than most people

I think test levels are a bit cope,as long as you don't have astrosky levels of 200ng/DL

This guy next to More Roids More Finasteride.com is apparently 1500 Ng natty and looks like the soyboy meme


Screenshot 2021 09 13 19 54 18 83
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: JosephGarrot123, Chad69, SteveRogers and 5 others
What about shbg and free t?
 
Way Better than most people

I think test levels are a bit cope,as long as you don't have astrosky levels of 200ng/DL

This guy next to More Roids More Finasteride.com is apparently 1500 Ng natty and looks like the soyboy meme


View attachment 1346021
he looks soy and besides that, how can a female on 80 mg test e have a better beard after 3 months transitioning than he has
 
I was high 700s while depressed
 
  • +1
Reactions: karbo
Good
 
  • +1
Reactions: karbo
Way Better than most people

I think test levels are a bit cope,as long as you don't have astrosky levels of 200ng/DL

This guy next to More Roids More Finasteride.com is apparently 1500 Ng natty and looks like the soyboy meme


View attachment 1346021
Steroids are cope man

There was a user on here who got to 1400 with natural t supplements
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: androgenic
getting a piece of paper that says you're high T isn't gonna change anything.
it does change things though. having learned the fact that i am not low t makes me inclined to work out
 
measured at 775ng/dl in an especially depressive state with shit diet and no exercise
its way better than i expected
820ng/dl i mog u
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: karbo
so your androgen receptors are meh right?
Whatever he'll tell you, that's not possible. he got to a size bigger than 80% of steroid users at the gym at a very short amount of time with minimal use according to him, if that's 'shit receptors' I'm out.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LastHopeForNorman
One shouldn't look at one hormone but all of them in congruency
 
6'3 82kg full body pic taken with no pump while tanning a week ago
View attachment 1346108

i'm a hyper responder in terms of serum levels

that change is completely illusory

let's look at this before pic of me as an example:
View attachment 1346113


this was my baseline physique. no exercise at all. based on just this pic, we can already make an inference regarding my muscle building potential.

muscle building potential is a simple formula. genetics + testosterone.

if my testosterone came back low, it would mean my genetics are better. if my testosterone came back high, it would mean my genetics are worse. the assumption regarding my actual muscle building potential wouldn't change in either of these cases.


someone with good genetics can still build muscle with 200 ng/dl and someone with bad genetics will build barely any muscle with 1200 ng/dl. logically, seeing your testosterone at a certain value shouldn't change your perception of how much muscle you're capable of building.
Looks good damn, mirin again. where did you read about this theory? it's sounds logical i guess you've read it somewhere? (lol don't mean it like that)
 
Daily reminder this is Emma Watson's twin sister
 
bump tbh
thoughts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chad69

Similar threads

swaggerdoodle
Replies
22
Views
349
BoredPrince
BoredPrince
chadmanlet04
Replies
28
Views
281
Saint Casanova
S
PeakIncels
Replies
3
Views
73
ey88
ey88
Vermilioncore
Replies
2
Views
26
heightmaxxing
heightmaxxing
R
Replies
7
Views
142
ronald_2
R

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top