I read this entire convo, overall I agree with you but that point about men falling in love and women not (or at least being less likely to) over a ONS is complete rubbish. Woman release bonding chemicals during intercourse which is why they catch feelings. For men, it's far easier and likely to just sleep with a women and then move on.
> The ensuing findings indicate that women showed higher OT levels than men. To our knowledge, this is one of the first demonstrations of a clear-cut difference in peripheral OT between the two sexes in humans.
Ot?
I see your point, and I agree. I wouldn't argue against the biological differences, it's just, my personal experiences suggests women can be more cold. And to that, I'm not sure what you present negates that, but it does negate that women can be less detached during sex, and that I wouldn't have argued against as I know nothing about that.
Bro, you're the one who got all butthurt about the definition and wanted to leave the conversation. I just pointed out that your definition is retarded since no one uses the phrase "cold approach" like you do.
No shit. We've circled around to the beginning of the argument, though. The point that I already made is that hot girls are not going to ioi you out of nowhere without you initiating first. That's why I initiate by staring, standing closer than normal, making passing comments, etc. If hot girls are doing double takes when you enter stores, great. I guess you're a gigachad. Not really relevant to 99% of guys for whom girls will not initiate iois like this.
Oxcytocin, the chemical that controls sexual arousal, recognition, trust, romantic attachment etc. is more prominent in women than men during intercourse, hence why men can sleep around more easily
Perfect, you seem redeemable. Now check this out, definitions are irrelevant, to an extent. We need to communicate, we have language, within that language, we have distinctions. Distinctions allow us to differentiate between a goal and a miss. Because, if the ball goes in, that's a goal, and if the ball doesn't go in, that's a miss. See where I'm going? I think your definition is incoherent due to the physical difference being the outcome. With an IOI, higher chance, without an IOI, lower chance. I call without an IOI "cold approach", you call with an IOI "cold approach". See this can't work because there is a physical, the outcome.
So does OT levels tell about bonding or just sexual arousal
Nobody cares what you think
Get dunked on, suck my dick, and I'm high as fuck right now. You should be ashamed.
Bonding. That's why you always hear about girls "catching feelings" when they sleep around it's because of the chemicals the body releases.
How often they catch feelings tho
I think often tbh. It's definitely a real thing, I know of many woman who have a one night stand and get attached.
Maybe the guys where attractive and they would had catched feelings wkrhout sex too
See, for me, this is the opposite. I'm black, I know women who are high earning, 40+, they sleep with a ton of men, even travel to do it, and have no intentions of marriage.
Might be that younger girls with higher hormone levels get attached easier
The first 5000 approaches are just a warm-up, bro!
That's different. They are fried at that age with 0 ability to pair bond. I'm on about younger people
Yeah, I realize that, see my most recent post.
True. Chads get rejected, laugh at the woman in her face, and move onto the next knowing he has no issues. Incels get SUICIDAL over one rejection JFL
Wdym avg people are delusional? Women are 100% yes, but average men are definitely not delusional, they know they are mediocre
Yeah, women. Men find out quick.
Normies want to believe they have more qualities than they do. I've seen it too much. It's more comforting. Weather this is true or not remains a different history. Your delusional assessment can be correct.
Yh like that exactly.Mirin erection strength if you were popping a noticeable tent while standing up
I should have said "how attractive", so, yeah, with the compliments you can get the idea you are good looking, but I think you will always struggle with the "how" unless you are hailed often as universally attractive, models.
Hot girls approach no one lmao
Yeah, I can't remember the last time I've seen a legit hot girl approach anyone. I'll have mid-tier girls approach me and give me numbers, but never anyone above a 5/10. I'm sure it happens in the right circumstances, though. It's just never going to happen to sub-chads.
They approach Saudi prince’s to get shat on in Dubai
Last stacylite model p in v approached me inna club but it was her gay friend who gave her the push and then she grabbed my arm and we started talking and making out
All you're training yourself to be is more aspie but you don't have the intellect to grasp that.well its not for getting foids, its for training myself to become less inhib and better at convo skills with foids. Check this thread if ur curious
Cold approached 4 foids earlier today
Ok hear me out. This isnt because i wanted to hit on them, cuz unless ur very gl, its like trying to pull the lottery. Anyways, i managed to talk to 2 foids for 2-3 minutes and we just talked about where we lived, what we do, etc. It went alright tbh. They asked me some questions back but no...looksmax.org
I'm going to play a saxophone for you
Come to pacific beach this weekend
There's a very weird phenomenon and it's that once you're past redcel you agree with all redcels in almost everything. It's like suddenly you know your shit.
Just cold approach 30 eormn and get brutally rejected to fuck some ltb theory maybe while you can get a htb for 150 dollars
I am soon used to it, feels better now. My inhibness is pretty low rn as i went out and talked to 2 more!
I've mainly only met foids by approaching
