growth hormone (гормон роста)

[drowining.in.sins]

should i use growth hormone, im 16 y.o. 181 cm tall. is there any side effects of growth hormone? and which one should i inject

 

[Peez]

"Should i use GH". WHY DO YOU WANT TO TAKE IT BRUV?

 

[drowining.in.sins]

"Should i use GH". WHY DO YOU WANT TO TAKE IT BRUV?

to grow a bit taller, in kz it isnt enough to be 5.11

 

[sha]

rich get richer

 

[asgard]

should i use growth hormone, im 16 y.o. 181 cm tall. is there any side effects of growth hormone? and which one should i inject

Yes

 

[crazybeaver]

Yes

Dumbass nga telling 16 year olds to inject hgh “ without any mitigation to the side effects” look at yourself fucker

 

[drowining.in.sins]

Dumbass nga telling 16 year olds to inject hgh “ without any mitigation to the side effects” look at yourself fucker

ahahah, nevermind. i understood that i need only ipomarline and cjc 1925

 

[cfshere]

ahahah, nevermind. i understood that i need only ipomarline and cjc 1925

that will not do the same as hgh

 

[drowining.in.sins]

that will not do the same as hgh

ik, first of all im too broke for hgh rn. secondly hgh is forbidden in our country

 

[asgard]

Dumbass nga telling 16 year olds to inject hgh “ without any mitigation to the side effects” look at yourself fucker

blitz-ad-hominem till 14km of moscow. a 16 year old at least has a more developed mind on average than a 14-fucking-year old to question and research the side effects, and secondly the mitigations for GH are easily researchable, you know what isn't? pan-FGFR3 inhibition, no bodybuilder runs it, almost no teen runs it.

 

[crazybeaver]

blitz-ad-hominem till 14km of moscow. a 16 year old at least has a more developed mind on average than a 14-fucking-year old to question and research the side effects, and secondly the mitigations for GH are easily researchable, you know what isn't? pan-FGFR3 inhibition, no bodybuilder runs it, almost no teen runs it.

bodybuilders that shrivel their balls up and die at 60? Wow

 

[asgard]

bodybuilders that shrivel their balls up and die at 60? Wow

they mess up their balls due to AAS, and die at 60 largely due to AAS, there is no proof that it was necessarily GH but what there is proof for is that AAS cause shorter lifespans than usual more than HGH ever does, and you can see this in the bodybuilders that dont run GH.

 

[asgard]

bodybuilders that shrivel their balls up and die at 60? Wow

it shows you had no prior exposure to any real biological research literature despite you being a "biomed student" if you're going to just use emotion in every single response, using all caps, etc...

 

[crazybeaver]

they mess up their balls due to AAS, and die at 60 largely due to AAS, there is no proof that it was necessarily GH but what there is proof for is that AAS cause shorter lifespans than usual more than HGH ever does, and you can see this in the bodybuilders that dont run GH.

you’re correct that aas are a major factor in both testicular atrophy and premature deaths among bodybuilders. testicular shrinkage is primarily caused by suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis from anabolic steroids, not gh.

however, that doesn’t mean gh is automatically harmless. many professional bodybuilders who used gh developed enlarged organs, insulin resistance, cardiomegaly, and other health complications associated with excess gh exposure. the problem is that most bodybuilders use multiple drugs simultaneously, making it difficult to isolate the contribution of gh to mortality.
therefore, saying “there is no proof gh caused the deaths” is true, but saying “therefore gh is not a contributing factor” does not logically follow. absence of proof is not proof of absence.
likewise, comparing gh to aas doesn’t prove gh is safe. even if aas are responsible for a larger share of the risk, gh could still add additional risk on top of that.
but this applies much to bodybuilders because they usually pin for long periods of time with high dosages of gh, causing the effects to me much more severe in bodybuilders.
and buddy the reason why no bodybuilder runs infigra is because gh can benefit greater towards bodybuilding than infigra

 

[crazybeaver]

it shows you had no prior exposure to any real biological research literature despite you being a "biomed student" if you're going to just use emotion in every single response, using all caps, etc...

that’s not really a valid critique of the argument, it’s just attacking tone and making assumptions about background instead of addressing the actual points raised. even if someone is wrong or overly emotional in how they phrase something, that doesn’t automatically invalidate the substance of what they’re saying. scientific arguments stand on mechanisms and evidence, not whether the wording is calm. if there’s an issue with the claims, it should be pointed out directly with counter-evidence, not by trying to dismiss the person’s credibility through tone policing or appeals to authority which you are currently trying to do

 

[asgard]

that’s not really a valid critique of the argument, it’s just attacking tone and making assumptions about background instead of addressing the actual points raised. even if someone is wrong or overly emotional in how they phrase something, that doesn’t automatically invalidate the substance of what they’re saying. scientific arguments stand on mechanisms and evidence, not whether the wording is calm. if there’s an issue with the claims, it should be pointed out directly with counter-evidence, not by trying to dismiss the person’s credibility through tone policing or appeals to authority which you are currently trying to do

you did multiple appeal to authority fallacies. and sure scientific arguments stand on mechanisms and evidence but low emotion control and bad wording are signs you haven't been exposed to scientific literature. Until now, neither have I nor you provided evidence to our claims but first of all this is .org secondly its very easy to tell whos closer to whats known in modern biology even if no evidence for it is provided within this specific debate.

 

[80llo]

Dumbass nga telling 16 year olds to inject hgh “ without any mitigation to the side effects” look at yourself fucker

what mitigation there is for hgh just take it soyboy

 

[zimione]

should i use growth hormone, im 16 y.o. 181 cm tall. is there any side effects of growth hormone? and which one should i inject

No. Take 36 iu and u will be 2m tall bro.

 

[AtrophicPyra]

should i use growth hormone, im 16 y.o. 181 cm tall. is there any side effects of growth hormone? and which one should i inject

Hgh is shit u need PajeetHyperbolaAlinine3-D aka PHA3-D it has been proven to initiate halal mode sequencing and boost niggamode matrix

This ultimately increases chrondrocyte proliferation more than differentiation making u taller

 

[crazybeaver]

you did multiple appeal to authority fallacies. and sure scientific arguments stand on mechanisms and evidence but low emotion control and bad wording are signs you haven't been exposed to scientific literature. Until now, neither have I nor you provided evidence to our claims but first of all this is .org secondly its very easy to tell whos closer to whats known in modern biology even if no evidence for it is provided within this specific debate.

no it isn’t btw low emotional control and exposure to scientific literature have no correlation whatsoever. Also, bad wording? Where’s the correlation to exposure? I’ve already said that the wording is due to emotions, but my concepts are solid and even without evidence I can accurately explain scientific processes and biological functions in this argument.

 

[crazybeaver]

what mitigation there is for hgh just take it soyboy

you do you