Guess the curry / latino - win 5 USDT!

SecularIslamist

SecularIslamist

๐•ฏ๐–๐•ฏ intersectional feminist and Islamist jihadi
Joined
Nov 21, 2022
Posts
27,844
Reputation
55,715
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 50815, Jason Voorhees, Klasik616 and 7 others
i failed
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
5/10
4B945D8D FF50 4636 B2F5 1DD7B0D63AD7
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
4943317 5ECD068C 7868 41A2 821D 0A354DA75296

8/10 damn
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 98009 and SecularIslamist
6/10 ๐Ÿ˜ญ
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 98009 and SecularIslamist
Swarth Belt theory remains undefeated
 
  • Love it
Reactions: SecularIslamist
@Latinolooksmaxxer @Shahnameh @Xangsane @Gengar
 
I clicked submit after choosing 4 but all 4 were right lmao :feelsuhh:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
So far everyone guessed her correct - was it that obvious?

Screenshot 2025 05 18 065117
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 131140, LTNUser, Klasik616 and 1 other person
Eyes and Lips are usually the biggest giveaway
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SecularIslamist
Holy shit I got 10/10
 
  • Woah
Reactions: SecularIslamist
latinos are mongrels though they can look like anything. i can make latino vs nordic and cherrypick the hell out of it. or latino or nigerian.

or latino or arab

or chinese

etc
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: Ogionth, Informationcapitali, Prรธphet and 1 other person
8/10
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: MyDreamIsToBe183CM
I got a 8/10 do when do I get the money?
 
latinos are mongrels though they can look like anything. i can make latino vs nordic and cherrypick the hell out of it. or latino or nigerian.

or latino or arab

or chinese

etc
You just don't get it do you. The latinos who look nigerian, look nigerian not latino. The latinos who look nordic, look nordic not latino.

The latinos who look curry and curries who look latino are indistinguishable from each other. The only thing that distinguishes them are their names, clothing and other visible giveaways. There is some difference in facial features but this isnt enough. This wasnt even a cherry pick. It didn;t take me long. All I had to do was google some name like "Carlos" or "Martinez" for linkedin profile. Just accept the swarth belt.
I got a 8/10 do when do I get the money?
I lied for engagement and data collection. Jewish tactic but it works.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: DravidianFootjob, 160cmcurry, itsherlossNVM and 2 others
10/10 whereโ€™s my money?
 
You just don't get it do you. The latinos who look nigerian, look nigerian not latino. The latinos who look nordic, look nordic not latino.

The latinos who look curry and curries who look latino are indistinguishable from each other. The only thing that distinguishes them are their names, clothing and other visible giveaways. There is some difference in facial features but this isnt enough. This wasnt even a cherry pick. It didn;t take me long. All I had to do was google some name like "Carlos" or "Martinez" on google. Just accept the swarth belt.

I lied for engagement and data collection. Jewish tactic but it works.
You can't "look latino" retard. There's 20 latino countries with vastly different phenotypes and citizens. you could be a dravidian straight out of sri lanka or a chinaman straight from beijing and if you speak like a local person no one is gonna think you are a foreigner. There's also way more latinos that look just like southern europeans, arabs, or just like native americans or just like sub saharan africans than anyone from south asia.

The "median" latino phenotype DOES not look indian at all though. It looks like something between a dark central asian turk and a nafri. most latinos have gookish eyes and a small round nose. as opposed to the curry bug eyes and shovel nose
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: itsherlossNVM
You just don't get it do you. The latinos who look nigerian, look nigerian not latino. The latinos who look nordic, look nordic not latino.

The latinos who look curry and curries who look latino are indistinguishable from each other. The only thing that distinguishes them are their names, clothing and other visible giveaways. There is some difference in facial features but this isnt enough. This wasnt even a cherry pick. It didn;t take me long. All I had to do was google some name like "Carlos" or "Martinez" for linkedin profile. Just accept the swarth belt.

I lied for engagement and data collection. Jewish tactic but it works.
yeah i think i got a bit lucky but i feel like there is a way to distinguish them from each other. Not exactly sure what it is tho
 
You can't "look latino" retard. There's 20 latino countries with vastly different phenotypes and citizens. you could be a dravidian straight out of sri lanka or a chinaman straight from beijing and if you speak like a local person no one is gonna think you are a foreigner. There's also way more latinos that look just like southern europeans, arabs, or just like native americans or just like sub saharan africans than anyone from south asia.

The "median" latino phenotype DOES not look indian at all though. It looks like something between a dark central asian turk and a nafri.
I never said that at all. The Latin american phenotype looks like Latin american as it should. I said that there is a grey area where millions are potentially indistinguishable from (lightskin) curries. But after simply doing even a cursory Google search - looks like there are some pretty dark skin ones too :feelswhat:

You're partially right but you want to downplay the curry part like usual. You did this for MENAs and you do it for Latinos too.

I'm not brushing every single country with the same shade of brown. Ofc in Argentina is different to Venezuela, which is different to Brazil and to Mexico etc. it's ridiculous to say there's more curry passing in Argentina than euro passing. But it's equally ridiculous to say there are more euro passing than curry passing in somewhere like Mexico.

yeah i think i got a bit lucky but i feel like there is a way to distinguish them from each other. Not exactly sure what it is tho
Nearly all of them are okay in almost any of these countries.
1747552205889
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
I never said that at all. The Latin american phenotype looks like Latin american as it should. I said that there is a grey area where millions are potentially indistinguishable from (lightskin) curries. But after simply doing even a cursory Google search - looks like there are some pretty dark skin ones too :feelswhat:

You're partially right but you want to downplay the curry part like usual. You did this for MENAs and you do it for Latinos too.

I'm not brushing every single country with the same shade of brown. Ofc in Argentina is different to Venezuela, which is different to Brazil and to Mexico etc. it's ridiculous to say there's more curry passing in Argentina than euro passing. But it's equally ridiculous to say there are more euro passing than curry passing in somewhere like Mexico.


Nearly all of them are okay in almost any of these countries.
View attachment 3745854
I somewhat agree. Although i dont think all of them would pass easily in some parts of MENA
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
I never said that at all. The Latin american phenotype looks like Latin american as it should. I said that there is a grey area where millions are potentially indistinguishable from (lightskin) curries. But after simply doing even a cursory Google search - looks like there are some pretty dark skin ones too :feelswhat:

You're partially right but you want to downplay the curry part like usual. You did this for MENAs and you do it for Latinos too.

I'm not brushing every single country with the same shade of brown. Ofc in Argentina is different to Venezuela, which is different to Brazil and to Mexico etc. it's ridiculous to say there's more curry passing in Argentina than euro passing. But it's equally ridiculous to say there are more euro passing than curry passing in somewhere like Mexico.


Nearly all of them are okay in almost any of these countries.
View attachment 3745854
No, you just said saharans and those other groups dont' "look latino" when they obviously do.

There's wayyyy more spaniard passing people in Mexico than Indian passing people. are you retarded? literally every country in Latin America has way more european passing people than south asian passing people. even Bolivia has more european passing people. even really brown Latino countries randomly create spaniard phenos at a decent clip due to mongrelization and phenotype =! genotype.

Have you watched a Telanovela?



the super brown countries in latin america look like central asians with orange skin like bolivia. they are way more gookish than bengalis.

afghans and pakis are wayy whiter than indians too, makes no sense to have india and afghanistan on the same tier.

Bolivia_m.jpg


Having Philippines on the same list as Romanians (literally white people no different from Ukrainians or Hungarians) is wild.
 
Bangladesh is really not India, but, if I were to criticize one it would be the first one because she's from Bangladesh
 
No, you just said saharans and those other groups dont' "look latino" when they obviously do.
If you look like this you are black. You do not look Latino. Just above you denied any such thing - that you can't look Latino and now you're claiming you can. You can't have it both ways.
1747579320347

There's wayyyy more spaniard passing people in Mexico than Indian passing people. are you retarded? literally every country in Latin America has way more european passing people than south asian passing people. even Bolivia has more european passing people. even really brown Latino countries randomly create spaniard phenos at a decent clip due to mongrelization and phenotype =! genotype.

Have you watched a Telanovela?


I literally never said that. OFC there are more Spanish passing people. When I said euro I meant Germanic, Anglo, Slav or Nordic. There I hardly any who look like this even in Mexico. There are definitely more curry passing than Norwegian passing. When I say curry passing obviously not the stereotypical curry, the uncommon curry - like 1 in 10. Which is common enough - that's numerically over 150 million people.

the super brown countries in latin america look like central asians with orange skin like bolivia. they are way more gookish than bengalis.

afghans and pakis are wayy whiter than indians too, makes no sense to have india and afghanistan on the same tier.

Bolivia_m.jpg
They do not look central Asian. Stop coping central Asians look like a white-gook hybrid. They are a swarthy hook more like the Phillipenes.
1747579719634


This phillipeno guy on left for example.

Having Philippines on the same list as Romanians (literally white people no different from Ukrainians or Hungarians) is wild.
They are on the outer swarthy and Phillipenes are swarthy gooks. They are different facially ofc, but they have overlaps with genuinely swarthy brown countries.
 
If you look like this you are black. You do not look Latino. Just above you denied any such thing - that you can't look Latino and now you're claiming you can. You can't have it both ways.
View attachment 3746906

I literally never said that. OFC there are more Spanish passing people. When I said euro I meant Germanic, Anglo, Slav or Nordic. There I hardly any who look like this even in Mexico. There are definitely more curry passing than Norwegian passing. When I say curry passing obviously not the stereotypical curry, the uncommon curry - like 1 in 10. Which is common enough - that's numerically over 150 million people.


They do not look central Asian. Stop coping central Asians look like a white-gook hybrid. They are a swarthy hook more like the Phillipenes.
View attachment 3746931

This phillipeno guy on left for example.


They are on the outer swarthy and Phillipenes are swarthy gooks. They are different facially ofc, but they have overlaps with genuinely swarthy brown countries.
you can't look latino. latino is not a race. in brazil and dr and cuba they would look latino. not in bolivia or argentina though. how can you not see that? again euro = europeans. not just northern europeans. and you are overestimating the difference between spaniards and brits.

romanians are not even swarthy. might as well add ukraine. you've clearly never been to even half of the countries. romanians are even less swarthy than french people

most spaniards pass as dark brits


these people pass as chilean or northern mexican easily.

IMG 9728

IMG 9727





mexicans look more like curries than jungle asians

IMG 9729


even peruvians don't look jungle


IMG 9730


jungle asians are way too mongoloid.
IMG 9731


idk why you want to dark wash every race but curries. latinos look way more like central asians than jungle asians. even legitimate bolivian indios do.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
i got 8 / 10. the first lady was such a hilarious cherrypick. just use surgery and photoshop augmentated freaks ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
you can't look latino. latino is not a race. in brazil and dr and cuba they would look latino. not in bolivia or argentina though. how can you not see that? again euro = europeans. not just northern europeans. and you are overestimating the difference between spaniards and brits.
They are European but they are med not white. I'm not overestimating it at all. Do you really think Anglos/Germans/Poles/ and other northern euros see Spanish and Italians as white as them? Hell no.
romanians are not even swarthy. might as well add ukraine. you've clearly never been to even half of the countries. romanians are even less swarthy than french people

most spaniards pass as dark brits
Have you ever seen Spanish people?? :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: I'm not denying some look white but the average is med. I genuinely think you're you're trollingif you say "most" Spanish can pass as brit.
The difference between a Spaniard and Brits isn't as big as a Spaniard and MENA obviously but there is a perceptible difference.



Less than 10% can pass as a Brit. This is British:

1747620689456

1747620709514

1747620740714

1747620772045


these people pass as chilean or northern mexican easily.

View attachment 3747490
View attachment 3747491


mexicans look more like curries than jungle asians
No they don't you know neither what a curry not jungle Asian looks like. I really wish I put another option for SEA in this quiz hardly anyone would've selected it.
View attachment 3747507

even peruvians don't look jungle


View attachment 3747517


jungle asians are way too mongoloid.
View attachment 3747521

idk why you want to dark wash every race but curries. latinos look way more like central asians than jungle asians. even legitimate bolivian indios do.
I never the average jungle Asians looks Latino. But certainly the 10% outlier (which is not a cherry pick) can pass as it at time. For example fiki naki

1747620915755
1747620939467


He could pass as BOTH jungle gook and Latino.

i got 8 / 10. the first lady was such a hilarious cherrypick. just use surgery and photoshop augmentated freaks ๐Ÿ˜‚
Yeah it's a cherry pick for Bengali but either way you claim facial features are good enough to distinguish but you got two wrong :forcedsmile:
 
They are European but they are med not white. I'm not overestimating it at all. Do you really think Anglos/Germans/Poles/ and other northern euros see Spanish and Italians as white as them? Hell no.

Have you ever seen Spanish people?? :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek: I'm not denying some look white but the average is med. I genuinely think you're you're trollingif you say "most" Spanish can pass as brit.
The difference between a Spaniard and Brits isn't as big as a Spaniard and MENA obviously but there is a perceptible difference.



Less than 10% can pass as a Brit. This is British:

View attachment 3748964
View attachment 3748966
View attachment 3748970
View attachment 3748973


No they don't you know neither what a curry not jungle Asian looks like. I really wish I put another option for SEA in this quiz hardly anyone would've selected it.

I never the average jungle Asians looks Latino. But certainly the 10% outlier (which is not a cherry pick) can pass as it at time. For example fiki naki

View attachment 3748982View attachment 3748984

He could pass as BOTH jungle gook and Latino.


Yeah it's a cherry pick for Bengali but either way you claim facial features are good enough to distinguish but you got two wrong :forcedsmile:

yes irl even turks are considered white. half of those speakers spaniards would pass as brits if blue eyed and lighter hair. no one considers italians not white but nordicists ( hitlerites) and coping shitskins who want to pretend that italians the highest smv nationality are somehow shitskins like them

most spaniards look white. you can distinguish easily russians and brits too fyi just because they're not swarthy doesn't mean they look the same. brits are notorious for racially profiling polish people. slavic faces are actually even more alien and distinguishable than mediterrรกneas ones



if you're properly racist like the average european or white person you can tell what country someone is from down country. let alone people from different continents like curries

bro just stop. even curries look more latino than jungles. jungles have super round noses and soft faces. latinos look nothing like them

you honestly see gonna say those central asians with the dark skin don't look latino? half of them pass as chilean or colombian
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
yes irl even turks are considered white. half of those speakers spaniards would pass as brits if blue eyed and lighter hair. no one considers italians not white but nordicists ( hitlerites) and coping shitskins who want to pretend that italians the highest smv nationality are somehow shitskins like them
LMAO ๐Ÿคฃ the point is they DON'T have light eyes and light hair. If I had green eyes and lighter hair I would also not look curry at all. Even if everything else about me was the same - only those autists who realized Bengalis have childish features with a hint of Tibetan gook will be able to tell.
most spaniards look white. you can distinguish easily russians and brits too fyi just because they're not swarthy doesn't mean they look the same. brits are notorious for racially profiling polish people. slavic faces are actually even more alien and distinguishable than mediterrรกneas ones

Yes they do racially profile poles and other eastern euros but that doesn't mean they don't consider them white. It's nationalism not racism. They hate every other nationality regardless of whether it's white or not.

if you're properly racist like the average european or white person you can tell what country someone is from down country. let alone people from different continents like curries

bro just stop. even curries look more latino than jungles. jungles have super round noses and soft faces. latinos look nothing like them
I'm not the one saying it you are. You are overemphasizing how much facial features overrides colouring.
you honestly see gonna say those central asians with the dark skin don't look latino? half of them pass as chilean or colombian
Central Asians (Kazakhs / Uzbeks) they don't look dark that much.
 
  • +1
Reactions: sigma boii
Got 8/10
Girl 1 and Girl 3 were my only incorrect guesses
It's surprising how the Girl 1 doesn't look Indian to me
What surprises me more is that She's Bengali and it's quite rare to find beautiful pale Bengali women like her ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist
1000058283
Give me my money nigger
 
7/10
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 131140

Similar threads

Clqs
Replies
7
Views
80
Matthew24
Matthew24
caleb555
Replies
9
Views
35
Trevor Wonter
Trevor Wonter
Skitsuna
Replies
17
Views
83
Skitsuna
Skitsuna
A
Replies
8
Views
34
DjNazi
DjNazi
The lost iqlet
Replies
2
Views
35
thekidd8
thekidd8

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top