Guirao moggs hard prime Pitt

whitegymmax

whitegymmax

Banned
Joined
Jun 3, 2023
Posts
7,534
Reputation
7,583
Screenshot 20230626 0938252
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Beastchodecode, WanderingBurro, forevermirin and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: Mrxshmallow, WanderingBurro, Emiqrox and 2 others
not even close
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beastchodecode and WanderingBurro
No, he DOES NOT.

Another PSL autism. Yes, the left has wider chin. Does not mean shit.

Any non-autist person, man or woman, would look at Brad Pitt, and immediately say that

PITT in this photo >>> GuiFaggo in this left

:feelscry:
Its not just chin lol. he mogs him in mmany other ways.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beastchodecode
  • +1
Reactions: Beastchodecode, arabcelxxx and chadcel;
are you blind?
 
Oh, illuminate us, in which "many" ways he mogs young Pitt... truly interested :feelshehe:
Doesn't have negative hooding,high set prominent zygos( pitt literally doesn't have zygos),better nose,better ramus. better philtrum/lips. skin quality many more.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: arabcelxxx and whitegymmax
Doesn't have negative hooding,high set prominent zygos( pitt literally doesn't have zygos),better nose,better ramus. better philtrum/lips.
Pitt does NOT have negative hooding in your photo, he is too young for that shit.

Left dude's zygos are NOT much larger. Do not make any difference. His nose is better. And his Ramus is a MINUS. Pitt's jaw is more proportionate. Pitt has BETTER LIPS. The left dude literally has a faggot lip.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: arabcelxxx
Just compare them in motion guirao is chad pitt is a htn,maybe chadlite at best. stop overrating him he's nothing special.




 
  • +1
Reactions: arabcelxxx
Pitt does NOT have negative hooding in your photo, he is too young for that shit.

Left dude's zygos are NOT much larger. Do not make any difference. His nose is better. And his Ramus is a MINUS. Pitt's jaw is more proportionate. Pitt has BETTER LIPS. The left dude literally has a faggot lip.
Normies.org
 
Normies.org
Normies are the ones who define beauty, not this obscure shithole, where every second user is homosexual autist, homoautists.org :feelscry:
 
  • +1
Reactions: WanderingBurro
Normies are the ones who define beauty, not this obscure shithole, where every second user is homosexual autist, homoautists.org :feelscry:
Normies think he's good looking because of his status and the fact that hollywood wants you to believe he is.(He is good looking but nothing special.), matthew mcconaughey looks like a 50 yo redneck crackhead but is considered a sex symbol because hollywood halo. if pitt was a nobody he would've get destroyed in a tinder experiment by someone objectively better looking like eriksen or maher.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Artemis
Normies think he's good looking because of his status and the fact that hollywood wants you to believe he is.(He is good looking but nothing special.), matthew mcconaughey looks like a 50 yo redneck crackhead but is considered a sex symbol because hollywood halo. if pitt was a nobody he would've get destroyed in a tinder experiment by someone objectively better looking like eriksen or maher.
Legit argument, but i do not buy it in general that Pitt is somehow worse looking than the guys you listed.

Brad Pitt is exactly the case where BEAUTY is objectively defined, unlike other actors, where status plays a bigger role in their attractiveness.
 
  • +1
Reactions: WanderingBurro and vaseqmoherad
Water. Pitt is a 8 guirao is a 9. Pitt just lacks the harmony of someone like cavill or chico to be any higher
 
  • +1
Reactions: whitegymmax
L take. Not even close.
 

Similar threads

theonewhocantascend
Replies
8
Views
58
Random_maxxer
Random_maxxer
S
Replies
2
Views
310
coisbhai
coisbhai
FloppaFlops
Replies
4
Views
467
AustinCutler
AustinCutler
HTN_Mentalcel
Replies
14
Views
295
axttt_
axttt_
B
Replies
22
Views
254
Madridista
Madridista

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top