OnlyCameHereToSay
Iron
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2021
- Posts
- 186
- Reputation
- 348
I mean if you think about it, your normie guy's sense of fashion and interior design is generally shit. It's mostly women and gay men that have the sense of what looks good in these avenues.
Same could be said of human looks. We all know that normie guys pull the "How did that guy get her? Looks must not matter much" when in reality, 9 times out of 10, even when you account for status, the guy in reality looks a good deal better than what normie guys are giving him credit for.
But it's further than that, guys seem unable to tell good aesthetics on women too for that matter. All it takes is some make up and revealing clothes to make most women 'hot' in the eyes of most guys. I mean my god even on here, and this is supposed to be a forum where members know what good aesthetics is. You've got members who think Sylvester Stalone made it because he's good looking despite having strong NCT and bad facial form. No, Stallone made it because he's got that classic "I made it against all odds" look, tough to be respected but with a face that says odd one out but overcame all obstacles. In America people love the good hearted underdog rising up story. Dolph Lundgren. despite being far more aesthetic wasn't haloed by anyone watching Rocky IV because he looks aristocratic as fuck, and we're taught from day one that aristocrats are evil. So in Stallone's case being built and ugly was a plus.
These same people probably think that Jeff Cavalier is a chad and that Jeff Nippard is a joke. Nippard doesn't even have the classic butt nugget look almost universal in under 5'9" guys because he's got a chad face and you need non nuggety looks to pull that off at 5'3".
TL;DR, men don't know aesthetics and beauty because it's not in their evolutionary need to know it.
Same could be said of human looks. We all know that normie guys pull the "How did that guy get her? Looks must not matter much" when in reality, 9 times out of 10, even when you account for status, the guy in reality looks a good deal better than what normie guys are giving him credit for.
But it's further than that, guys seem unable to tell good aesthetics on women too for that matter. All it takes is some make up and revealing clothes to make most women 'hot' in the eyes of most guys. I mean my god even on here, and this is supposed to be a forum where members know what good aesthetics is. You've got members who think Sylvester Stalone made it because he's good looking despite having strong NCT and bad facial form. No, Stallone made it because he's got that classic "I made it against all odds" look, tough to be respected but with a face that says odd one out but overcame all obstacles. In America people love the good hearted underdog rising up story. Dolph Lundgren. despite being far more aesthetic wasn't haloed by anyone watching Rocky IV because he looks aristocratic as fuck, and we're taught from day one that aristocrats are evil. So in Stallone's case being built and ugly was a plus.
These same people probably think that Jeff Cavalier is a chad and that Jeff Nippard is a joke. Nippard doesn't even have the classic butt nugget look almost universal in under 5'9" guys because he's got a chad face and you need non nuggety looks to pull that off at 5'3".
TL;DR, men don't know aesthetics and beauty because it's not in their evolutionary need to know it.