Gym is retarded cope (natty)

[gautama333]

I too often hear it's the best looksmax and that it is the only thing one can change. This is cope and wrong.

When you begin you are to some degree either underweight or overweight. If you're overweight, the obvious looksmax is just to stop being fat. If you're underweight, you're either going to make progress that isn't ever noticeable at sight, or your muscle is only gonna be visible when you bulk.

Bulking is the option if you want to actually improve and have visible muscle if not roided, but your face is gonna look like shit, your skin is gonna look like shit, and you're overall gonna lose more than you gain at least on the looks department.

And when you cut, unless you don't cut enough, the muscle is going to stop being visible again unless you're shirtless, which just gets you back to the first point. Bodybuilding natty is a waste of time if what you care about is looks.

Most people who say it's a looksmax either don't get laid, or would get laid without the gym anyway. It's either a looksmin or completely irrelevant if you're natty.

If you look like shit when skinny and you're not a teenager still going through puberty, it's probably over and no gym can change that.

 

[Kitai]

water found in ocean

 

[LongHairToMog]

>gym is cope
>natty

obviously its cope then retard

 

[gautama333]

>gym is cope
>natty

obviously its cope then retard

Not natty might be a looksmax, but might be a looksmin depending on genetic conditions of which the knowledge is somewhat complicated. The amount of factors that influence the receptivity and secondary effect of this or that sterioid is very big.

And, at the risk of insane water retention and bloating, acne, etc. it's much riskier (and more expensive on the long term) than most hardmaxxes. It can be decent, but very hard to control so very likely gymcel cope too.

Also I'd bet you and/or most of the people on the forum are gonna stay natty because you want to believe in redpill bullshit (honestly as bad as the bluepill)