PharmaPhaggot
Busy slaying stacies, brb
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2024
- Posts
- 12,738
- Reputation
- 17,318
Lean is law, fat is a felony
Skin is status, acne is social suicide
Poetry
Skin is status, acne is social suicide
Poetry
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Masteron till 20Lean is law, fat is a felony
Skin is status, acne is social suicide
Poetry
I think I have virtually no life. I am arguing why an androgenic compound is more stunning that an another androgenic compoundI will make a thread talking about how DHT mogs Test TO MUMBAI.
Dut and fin are gonna turn you into a femboyMasteron till 20
Dutasteride forever
Finasteride till dutasteride kicks in
simple rule
In what regardI will make a thread talking about how DHT mogs Test TO MUMBAI.
Dht is x2-5 times more potent and binds to androgen receptors 7-10 times moreIn what regard
Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteronDht is x2-5 times more potent and binds to androgen receptors 7-10 times more
Hence it's effect on bones and muscle would be way stronger
Additionally it doesnt aromatize and maestron gives you that dry roided out look.
And DHT speeds up growth plates closure way slower than testosterone [even if we dont count e2 that aromatizes from test]
Holy shit obviously tren mogs anything to mumbai.Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteron
I think i have autism
Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteron
I think i have autism
The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogsHoly shit obviously tren mogs anything to mumbai.
I was talking about test
But you anyway need to pair mast with test. DHT elevation suppresses test anyways
Also potency part would be correct but dht is x5 potency of test depending on the person so you cant just quintuple your test dose to match dht.
Some affect it more some less, theres a very big difference between test and mastAlso raping of hair follicles is purely genetic and every androgen affects it
Then would var be better than dht?The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogs
Mainly from potencySome affect it more some less, theres a very big difference between test and mast
But what about crainiofacial growth? tren still mogs?The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogs
It would be a lot better than dht, compared to tren, not really as they are toi different, the a:a ratio is a pretty bad proxy for any given effect and the most oversimplification ever of an androgenThen would var be better than dht?
Its way more anabolic compared to androgenic, the same ratio as tren. Just tren is way stronger
then what aboutIt would be a lot better than dht, compared to tren, not really as they are toi different, the a:a ratio is a pretty bad proxy for any given effect and the most oversimplification ever of an androgen
But what about crainiofacial growth? tren still mogs?
I would strongly doubt the abilities of any androgen, tren includedthen what about