Hair is life, balding is a death sentence

PharmaPhaggot

PharmaPhaggot

Busy slaying stacies, brb
Joined
Oct 14, 2024
Posts
12,738
Reputation
17,318
Lean is law, fat is a felony

Skin is status, acne is social suicide

Poetry
 
  • +1
Reactions: 81xa, acm, Former Shortcel and 5 others
Water
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 76870
Lean is law, fat is a felony

Skin is status, acne is social suicide

Poetry
Masteron till 20
Dutasteride forever
Finasteride till dutasteride kicks in


simple rule
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot, Former Shortcel, mohito and 1 other person
I will make a thread talking about how DHT mogs Test TO MUMBAI.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 76870
I will make a thread talking about how DHT mogs Test TO MUMBAI.
I think I have virtually no life. I am arguing why an androgenic compound is more stunning that an another androgenic compound
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and Deleted member 76870
In what regard
Dht is x2-5 times more potent and binds to androgen receptors 7-10 times more
Hence it's effect on bones and muscle would be way stronger

Additionally it doesnt aromatize and maestron gives you that dry roided out look.
And DHT speeds up growth plates closure way slower than testosterone [even if we dont count e2 that aromatizes from test]
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot and mohito
Dht is x2-5 times more potent and binds to androgen receptors 7-10 times more
Hence it's effect on bones and muscle would be way stronger

Additionally it doesnt aromatize and maestron gives you that dry roided out look.
And DHT speeds up growth plates closure way slower than testosterone [even if we dont count e2 that aromatizes from test]
Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteron

I think i have autism
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohito
Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteron

I think i have autism
Holy shit obviously tren mogs anything to mumbai.
I was talking about test
But you anyway need to pair mast with test. DHT elevation suppresses test anyways
Also potency part would be correct but dht is x5 potency of test depending on the person so you cant just quintuple your test dose to match dht.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
Also raping of hair follicles is purely genetic and every androgen affects it
Potency isnt really an important metric as you can just adjust any doss for potency, instead whay matters is what genes actually get activated most when the ar is bound to an androgen when evaluating an androgen. And the process of growth from androgens is mainly caused by genes relating to protein synthesis but also a bit with stuff for nitrogen retention and other shit, but more anabolic androgens obviously trigger this more than less anabolic substances and dht is on the end of a lot less nabolic substances which is why studies time after time show that nuking dht with dutasteride does in fact not significantly affect muscle growth. The group of gene expression that we call androgenicity are mainly not the type of stuff looksmaxxers should want, collagen gets broken down after mmp's are upregulated, produced collagen becomes less elastic, all cardiovascular health detriments assosiated with steroid use is pretty much exclusively driven by androgenicity like the raped lipids and bp, acne and inflammation from the increased sebum, obviouslyraped hair, i vould go on and on but you dont want androgenicity and you do want anabolism for these reasons, atleast if you do want androgenicity you shouldnt ant it long term atleast as it does give less subcutaneous water and glycogen which is why people might look good short term on masteron for example. But still even if you do want those 2 things masteron should never in a million years be your first option, it has 0 anabolism pretty much, of course this isnt the first priority in this case but you can get it while youre at it so why not do so, 2 its not actually that androgenic, but it appears extremely androgenic ik certain places like hair and face because its suåer selective to skin and hair and super potent at triggering genes that rape collagen and hair, so youre really getting the aestetic negatives while noy getting a ton of aestetic positives in relativity as that super androgenicity is jot systemic but locall, trenbolone instead does not act this way and instead is inherently just more androgenic, thia means that yes it has the potential as to rape hair and skin like mast does but for the same risk at an equivalent dose it gives way betyer dryness and pump, and if you choose equivalent foses for pump and dryness tren is WAY hair and elastin safe it just appears worse because its more commonly ran by low imhib retards running that shit at super high doses like 500mg+ even though its even more potent than mast and also with no anti androgens, but if you adjust dosages as to a dose where they are equall in any given aspect tren mogs . So tren rapes its inferior masteron

I think i have autism
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 81xa and PharmaPhaggot
Holy shit obviously tren mogs anything to mumbai.
I was talking about test
But you anyway need to pair mast with test. DHT elevation suppresses test anyways
Also potency part would be correct but dht is x5 potency of test depending on the person so you cant just quintuple your test dose to match dht.
The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogs
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICL
The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogs
Then would var be better than dht?
Its way more anabolic compared to androgenic, the same ratio as tren. Just tren is way stronger
 
  • +1
Reactions: PharmaPhaggot
Some affect it more some less, theres a very big difference between test and mast
Mainly from potency
The same wouldnapply to test as test also isnt selecetive to hair and skin, it would just make less sense to do extreme doses of test rather than tren which is why i mentioned tren but if the question is asked test still mogs
But what about crainiofacial growth? tren still mogs?
 
Then would var be better than dht?
Its way more anabolic compared to androgenic, the same ratio as tren. Just tren is way stronger
It would be a lot better than dht, compared to tren, not really as they are toi different, the a:a ratio is a pretty bad proxy for any given effect and the most oversimplification ever of an androgen
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICL

Similar threads

CorinthianLOX
Replies
10
Views
68
true_subhuman_here
true_subhuman_here
arlo_420
Replies
68
Views
561
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
seiba
Replies
0
Views
28
seiba
seiba
mulattocel
Replies
99
Views
624
mulattocel
mulattocel
M
Replies
73
Views
474
cvnce
cvnce

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top