I still plan on dut megadose + RU for 1 year total before considering min, so we’ll see. You seem more hopeful for reversing miniaturisation with those drugs than I do
Over time, it'll come back, yes. Not as quick as minoxidil for obvious reasons, but it doesn't really look like you've got much ground to gain back considering it looks pretty bald for a solid chunk of the lost ground.
I don’t think it looks pretty bald at all? The hairs are light but are clearly there in the first image. My thoughts are it’s a larger area with diffuse miniaturisation as opposed to slight bald recession. This is the type of miniaturisation that the drugs should be able to reverse if they weren’t cope for this
No, it doesn't look bad at all and you won't be losing anymore ground anytime soon anyway. Don't stress.
No, bald, not bad. You said it looks pretty bald, while I’m saying there are no bald areas as shown in the first pic
Not in that pic you just sent.
Bald here is a bit more nuanced. I'm not saying you're laser bald. It's just relatively less dense so don't expect the prior density to be restored in totality. It's not bad at all.?
Gotcha. Although I think that line angulation is a bit liberal and “NW0” looking. I think this is more realistic
Yeah, I remember you saying that to me before now you say it. It could really just be your natural pattern to lack density there. It happens. I don't see why you can't have it restored to pre-Liverpool-molester you.
You say dut and RU will reverse it but told me I needed a hair transplant a couple of months ago!
That threw a spanner in the works. Anyway, I’ll post video updates every 3 months
Ignorance to your hair beforehand was the main reason.You say dut and RU will reverse it but told me I needed a hair transplant a couple of months ago!
I don’t think transplants there look good. Especially for someone who will hyper analyse their own hairline. I think I’d rather be NW2 than “NW1” with a transplant. Femboymaxxers like you may see it differently
Yes. Fem requires far more density.
Having said that, look at hairlines of women with their hair tied back. Many actually have around a NW1.5-2 pattern visible, just with a lot of thin/baby hairs in NW0 region. I’m talking about young women too. I’ve noticed this irl. Obviously they won’t be near slick bald, but you’ll notice the hairs are basically always thinner at the corners in women
Depends on the woman. I've seen some with quite literally overgrown temples to the point you're surprised by it. I have saw those you're talking about though.
Yeah but in those women, the centre of the hairline is still usually thicker
That's insane. Liverpool is breeding Vegeta-lookalikes brah.
bro face reveal atp, you stress too much about it. take your stuff and you'll be fine.View attachment 4235103
Zoom in and you’ll see differences in shaft thickness
Lighting where it looks worse:
View attachment 4235106
Lighting where it looks better:
View attachment 4235107
@imontheloose what is your humble opinion on minoxidil in this case? Worth it?
This was by the Tower of London. She was probably a foreigner
Probably some Thai BVLL in disguise.
I think that and then I see it in some lighting where the thinner hairs are barely visible and it looks like a bald NW2. I have worn my hair back with a hairband for the last two days at work tho
day 250 of waiting for a face reveal.
I’ve posted my side (chincel) and basically all parts of my face. You could probably piece me togetherday 250 of waiting for a face reveal.
