hairy arms on a small wrists is so subhuman

Sicilian Cyclops

Sicilian Cyclops

59mm IPD Mogger
Joined
Jan 1, 2025
Posts
2,898
Reputation
4,521
Shave that shit off. It's legit preferable to be a faggy femboy concubine twink than to look like a disgusting goblin manchild abomination. The contrast of manly bodyhair on thin woman wrists is just so disgusting to gaze upon.
659qm12yxvm81
:lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: isis_Bleach, Minuskul, Aconite and 15 others
Shave that shit off. It's legit preferable to be a faggy femboy concubine twink than to look like a disgusting goblin manchild abomination. The contrast of manly bodyhair on thin woman wrists is just so disgusting to gaze upon.
View attachment 4243429 :lul:
Yeah that’s me tbh
@Eltrē
 
  • +1
Reactions: IBL4MEZYG, MiserableMan, SouthAfricancel and 3 others
Return to monke
 
  • JFL
Reactions: gonion wanter
this is also why facial hair looks comical on cutecels
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops, MiserableMan, Prøphet and 1 other person
you will still look like a goblin, just a shaved one if your skin is that dark
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dorogi
@Dorogi
 
  • +1
Reactions: Dorogi
Thats why a shave my arms lol
i got lucky with that, even if i don't shave my arms the hair is barely visible (still needs to be shaved off though)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops and Dorogi
i got lucky with that, even if i don't shave my arms the hair is barely visible (still needs to be shaved off though)
Same. i got really low androgen receptor sensitivity so even on test i barely have any body hair but i still shave since its better to go all femboy at that point
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRetard and Sicilian Cyclops
We can condense the title of this thread to small wrists is so subhuman. Doesn't matter what you do if as a man your wrists are that thin in the photo.

Off the top of my head:
7.5"+ healthy dimorphic skeleton
7" getting a little thin
6.5" Ugh...
6" oh no
5.5" it's over. Framelet like that is like being a manlet. 5.5" wrists are in the photo of OP.

You don't need to be good looking to get a child, though. You do need to be good looking to have good relationships with young women though.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
I just finished writing another post to the pile of why gym is cope and skeleton is what matters. How could anybody argue that wrist size isn't the result of the size of the ulna and radius?

Hey dude on Looksmax, in the same way that Chads just fall into shape during the later years of their teenage and beginnings of their twenties never needing to have pulled out and stepped into a gym, incels fall into ridicule at their skeletal failings. There is absolutely nothing that can be done for the attractiveness or strength of the wrists in OPs picture.

It's all determined by the solid frame of our persistence on this planet. And if your skeleton is too thin and sickly, you'll be weak and a beta all your life because of the laws of physics that thicker longer bones can withstand more force and anchor longer stronger muscles. GPE means that a forearm that is 1.5 meters long can produce more force than one that is 1 meters.

I hate being reminded of both Chad's superiority and the peril of the meek, neither of whom had chosen the life they have.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever and Sicilian Cyclops
We can condense the title of this thread to small wrists is so subhuman. Doesn't matter what you do if as a man your wrists are that thin in the photo.

Off the top of my head:
7.5"+ healthy dimorphic skeleton
7" getting a little thin
6.5" Ugh...
6" oh no
5.5" it's over. Framelet like that is like being a manlet. 5.5" wrists are in the photo of OP.

You don't need to be good looking to get a child, though. You do need to be good looking to have good relationships with young women though.
5.5 is crazy. I'm 6.25 and almost NEVER see any man smaller than me, the fact that there are people almost an inch smaller than that is crazy.
 
Last edited:
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever and Lookologist003
5.5 is crazy. I'm 6.25 and almost NEVER see any man smaller than me, the fact that there are people almost an inch smaller than that is crazy.
6.25. I don't want to depress you, but I feel like I should try to inform you of why you feel that way. 6.25 is the second percentile of wrist sizes in men.


And, as we ought to know, yes there are guys who are really that unfortunate. Like in picture of OP.

I used to have a schoolmate who had really really thin wrists and long fingers. He got the nickname of ET, brutal. And that's just the bone of your hands far away from the bone of your face, fucking hell, brutal. I didn't expect to be thinking about that this evening.

According to US infantry surveys that I tried to link above, my guess is not that incorrect. You'd look very Chadly with 7.5" wrists and be 90th percentile, meaning that you mog 90% of guys in that regard. But you'd probably not look that good unless you were 7.5" wrists and like 6'3. Proportions, as always. Cyclops, we could make an index of wrist size to height and I bet, I bet, that could be used to indicate how robust some guy is. Because you can just imagine how alien or fragile a guy who had 6" wrists at 6'5 would be.

I feel like this is already attempted like in boxing or other sports, I just don't know about it because I never got into that. Otherwise, I'm going to let that idea marinate in my mind.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
We can condense the title of this thread to small wrists is so subhuman. Doesn't matter what you do if as a man your wrists are that thin in the photo.

Off the top of my head:
7.5"+ healthy dimorphic skeleton
7" getting a little thin
6.5" Ugh...
6" oh no
5.5" it's over. Framelet like that is like being a manlet. 5.5" wrists are in the photo of OP.

You don't need to be good looking to get a child, though. You do need to be good looking to have good relationships with young women though.

Mine are 6.5, didnt even know they go as low as 5.5

Thankfully my shoulders are wide compared to wrists/waist so it hasn't hurt me much
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
I just finished writing another post to the pile of why gym is cope and skeleton is what matters. How could anybody argue that wrist size isn't the result of the size of the ulna and radius?

Hey dude on Looksmax, in the same way that Chads just fall into shape during the later years of their teenage and beginnings of their twenties never needing to have pulled out and stepped into a gym, incels fall into ridicule at their skeletal failings. There is absolutely nothing that can be done for the attractiveness or strength of the wrists in OPs picture.

It's all determined by the solid frame of our persistence on this planet. And if your skeleton is too thin and sickly, you'll be weak and a beta all your life because of the laws of physics that thicker longer bones can withstand more force and anchor longer stronger muscles. GPE means that a forearm that is 1.5 meters long can produce more force than one that is 1 meters.

I hate being reminded of both Chad's superiority and the peril of the meek, neither of whom had chosen the life they have.
Water. I have 7 inch wrists and I can’t bench above 125 kgs naturally due to severe wrist pain even with wraps.

Although you can still build big enough arms with smallish wrists.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops and Lookologist003
it has wabi sabi
 
  • +1
Reactions: Incelforeever
Off the top of my head:
7.5"+ healthy dimorphic skeleton
7" getting a little thin
6.5" Ugh...
6" oh no
5.5" it's over. Framelet like that is like being a manlet. 5.5" wrists are in the photo of OP.
ok i was trolling but this is interesting to me, how would you even measure this?
 
Shave that shit off. It's legit preferable to be a faggy femboy concubine twink than to look like a disgusting goblin manchild abomination. The contrast of manly bodyhair on thin woman wrists is just so disgusting to gaze upon.
View attachment 4243429 :lul:
the watch looks heavy on his wrist wtf :lul::lul:
 
Water. I have 7 inch wrists and I can’t bench above 125 kgs naturally due to severe wrist pain even with wraps.

Although you can still build big enough arms with smallish wrists.
It should be water, but I was arguing like a moron with other morons. Of course, it only makes sense if you have any capabilities of reasoning and aren't coping. Why was I again arguing with copers. I was having a bad day, repeating myself and my beliefs like a mantra is my own way of coping. I don't like watering the gardens, but I also feel catatonic after yet another awkward and blackpilled exchange in my day.

I've seen you on the forum, and you seem actually blackpilled, so it would be water. But guys on here, especially new guys, are like lightly blackpilled, not having the opinions that you are your looks, not understanding how important height is, not understanding how important frame is, not understanding that all of your bone, head to toe is in assessment by women and guys looking to establish the pecking order.

What I meant to say not in a million words is I'm going through the motions.

ok i was trolling but this is interesting to me, how would you even measure this?
Tape measure. It's a flexible piece of material with unit marks on it. Wrap it just bellow your palm and you too can know how you size up.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Tape measure. It's a flexible piece of material with unit marks on it. Wrap it just bellow your palm and you too can know how you size up.
I did it right the first time i just fucked up the measuring part and got a smaller size than the girth of my dih which i knew was impossible. i’m actually 7.5”
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003
6.25. I don't want to depress you, but I feel like I should try to inform you of why you feel that way. 6.25 is the second percentile of wrist sizes in men
Yeah bro, I'm already vividly aware of my wristceldom, no need to console me about it :lul:

TBH It doesn't bother me that much because I got lucky with wide clavicles and a big rib cage. My bones are thin, but long. I honestly think I might have some mild version of Marfan syndrome, I got the narrow palate and long fingers as well, only thing I lack is the height :feelsbadman:

According to US infantry surveys that I tried to link above, my guess is not that incorrect. You'd look very Chadly with 7.5" wrists and be 90th percentile, meaning that you mog 90% of guys in that regard. But you'd probably not look that good unless you were 7.5" wrists and like 6'3. Proportions, as always. Cyclops, we could make an index of wrist size to height and I bet, I bet, that could be used to indicate how robust some guy is. Because you can just imagine how alien or fragile a guy who had 6" wrists at 6'5 would be.

I feel like this is already attempted like in boxing or other sports, I just don't know about it because I never got into that. Otherwise, I'm going to let that idea marinate in my mind.
I don't think height and wrist correlate that much. Anecdotal, but this really tall guy I work with who is around 6'6" has wrists pretty close in size to me, while this 5'4 Mexican dude has massive fucking 8 inch tree trunks.

Of course there's absolutely a trend for taller people to have thicker bones, but I don't think it's THAT significant. I think it has more to do with the environment, people who are under more physical stress during their development get thicker bones. Manual labor is a big factor for this. Just have a look at the wrists & hands of Boomers & Gen X vs Gen Z. The older generations are fucking units, while Gen Z are dinky fucking twigs. Older generations generally used their hands a lot more while the younger generations didn't, generally being more sedentary. Lowering T levels & vitamin D deficiency are big factors to consider as well, definitely correlated with the rise of sedentariness and being indoors most of the time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003

Similar threads

D
Replies
24
Views
16K
looks.hvh
looks.hvh
D
Replies
29
Views
19K
clover
clover
LeonidasGui
Replies
48
Views
4K
iitsnik
iitsnik
D
Replies
122
Views
48K
seven?
seven?

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top