c0pemaxxer
Gold
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2023
- Posts
- 754
- Reputation
- 1,065
after his gf cucked him now he is coping hard, bro is reading books so he can keep his ltb gf next time
jfl
jfl
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i agree with his message of self-improvement, but it's going to do absolutely nothing when it comes to dating. he completely denies the blackpill and just deludes all his followers (who are all curry incels).He is right about some stuff
All he says is gymmax and careermaxi agree with his message of self-improvement, but it's going to do absolutely nothing when it comes to dating. he completely denies the blackpill and just deludes all his followers (who are all curry incels).
no, he blatantly denies the blackpill and tells that your genetics dont matter at all.All he says is gymmax and careermax
YesDid she acc leave him? Jfl
Yeah I get no interaction now. Guess it’s a good thing maybe I can finally move on with lifeYes
also u descended hard in this forum ngl
probably cheated on him lmfao he made a video after the breakup saying "reject women"Did she acc leave him? Jfl
Inb4 ur a red name in 2 weeksYeah I get no interaction now. Guess it’s a good thing maybe I can finally move on with life
If you want a family and a loving wife I guess this is what it takes
IMO the only way to protect monogamy is to implement traditional and religious values, marriage is inherently traditional in its core, if the couple aren´t traditional / religious marriage won´t go far, when cheating is deemed legal and not incriminated it opens the path for people to cheat without consequences and therefore the institution of marriage that makes up civilisation deteroriates and loses its fundemental meaning. the only path to maintain civilisation is through forced monogamy.The Way of the Superior Man is such a cucked book. It has good insights into masculinity and achieving/finding your purpose but all the shit Deida writes about women is cucked. It basically frames female neuroticism as the “divine feminine” and teaches you how to constantly validate her while also remaining higher status so she doesn’t become a neurotic fuck, activate her hypergamous instinct and leave you.
Deida is actually right in his insights, and his ability to positively frame the situation that is monogamous long term relationships borders on skill equivalent to that of the Bible’s ability to ease the tension of being a self aware animal in a chaotic pointless world. Following Deidas advice will probably help you keep your chick but at what cost? Is constantly having to psuedo game your wife so she remains loving and faithful worth all the effort? If you want a family and a loving wife I guess this is what it takes…
yeah I agree. Civilization is too dependent on men for women to run around primitively searching for Chad.IMO the only way to protect monogamy is to implement traditional and religious values, marriage is inherently traditional in its core, if the couple aren´t traditional / religious marriage won´t go far, when cheating is deemed legal and not incriminated it opens the path for people to cheat without consequences and therefore the institution of marriage that makes up civilisation deteroriates and loses its fundemental meaning. the only path to maintain civilisation is through forced monogamy.
The sexual market shouldn´t get liberalized at all, i´m inclined to think that the elites want to implement a soft eugenic plan, but i don´t see how this is going to benefit them in the long run because only a minority of men will afford to procreate which implies a drastic decrease in population therefore a small consumption base. we truly live in messed up times.Hamza is in the bargaining phase
yeah I agree. Civilization is too dependent on men for women to run around primitively searching for Chad.
Either enforce monogamy or deal with having to jump through infinite hoops with the hopes you don’t get divorce raped and the eventual collapse of any stabilized society.
You’re probably reading too much into it. Elites didn’t create the sexual revolution, technology did. If women had to labor out in the sun all day moving heavy objects like labor has been for most of history, they would not be striving for independence from men. Elites probably don’t want civilization decline but the short term money that can be had from profiting off it likely clouds any long term judgements of its sustainability.The sexual market shouldn´t get liberalized at all, i´m inclined to think that the elites want to implement a soft eugenic plan, but i don´t see how this is going to benefit them in the long run because only a minority of men will afford to procreate which implies a drastic decrease in population therefore a small consumption base. we truly live in messed up times.
i can´t deny that technology and silicon valley tech revolution destabilized society, however women have always throughout history followed men´s course, the 1st intellectual feminist wave was started by male french postmodernist philosophers like Baudrillard, who was the mentor of de Beauvoir, women would never dare to liberate themselves , it was the intellectual soycucks and politians who wanted more tax payers who incited them to. So i assume that feminism wouldn´t be that much of a deal if men kept enforcing patriarchy despite the technological advancements.You’re probably reading too much into it. Elites didn’t create the sexual revolution, technology did. If women had to labor out in the sun all day moving heavy objects like labor has been for most of history, they would not be striving for independence from men. Elites probably don’t want civilization decline but the short term money that can be had from profiting off it likely clouds any long term judgements of its sustainability.
Yeah I agree. Soy fuckers decided women should be liberated and women followed the lead. In that sense, technology only enabled liberation whereas before such an idea would have been seen as absurd. You can even see it today where women are still taking the lead from men in terms of liberation, that is taking the lead from large multinational conglomerates marketing “female liberation” to them. However now that liberation is no longer liberation but supremacy. These companies realize women are neurotic and agreeable so they play into the female power fantasy and collective inferiority complex that is feminism to sell products. We’ve also unleashed male simping to the highest extent and demasculinized men so that they no longer see an issue with it. Many men feel something is wrong but they are so detached from their instincts and society has become so atomized for them to do anything about it. Giving women equal social power to men was like being the last surviving civilization on earth and giving the remaining toddlers handguns. The toddlers shouldn’t have the handguns and you could probably take it away from them if you tried but no one wants to get shot trying to do it. Plus the toddlers are cute so beating the shit out of them and taking the handguns away feels bad. You have a bunch of people saying “look we can’t have toddlers running around with handguns” but other people are saying “what do you want us to do? Hurt the toddlers to take them away? Plus what if we get shot trying do that?” Then another group has a bunch of candy that they found. This group realizes that people are scared of the toddlers and decides to get on the toddlers good side buy feeding them candy. The toddlers will get fat and unhealthy because they can’t help but eat the candy and in return the toddlers don’t shoot them and they can share in the toddler authority. The problem is, if all the toddlers get fat and unhealthy and develop diabetes, there goes your civilization because they will all die prematurely and there will be no more children to keep it going. The toddlers are happy but they are hurting themselves, the people feeding the toddlers are happy because they can share in the toddler authority, the scared people aren’t happy but atleast they don’t get shot, and the rest of the people are looking at the situation and saying “fuck it, I don’t want to live in a society run by handgun wielding toddlers” and leaving.i can´t deny that technology and silicon valley tech revolution destabilized society, however women have always throughout history followed men´s course, the 1st intellectual feminist wave was started by male french postmodernist philosophers like Baudrillard, who was the mentor of de Beauvoir, women would never dare to liberate themselves , it was the intellectual soycucks and politians who wanted more tax payers who incited them to. So i assume that feminism wouldn´t be that much of a deal if men kept enforcing patriarchy despite the technological advancements.
i´m impressed by your analogy , very spot on. And you are right , post industrial revolution accelerated the feminist agenda to such an alarming extent , not to mention the microplastic epedimic ,polution, processed food and GMO products which played a great role in the emasculation and feminization of men, industrial revolution truly was a disaster for the human species. i just pray that a huge geomagnetic excursion happen so that survivors rebuild the civilisation from scratch , and hopefully they don´t fall for the same grave mistakes again.Yeah I agree. Soy fuckers decided women should be liberated and women followed the lead. In that sense, technology only enabled liberation whereas before such an idea would have been seen as absurd. You can even see it today where women are still taking the lead from men in terms of liberation, that is taking the lead from large multinational conglomerates marketing “female liberation” to them. However now that liberation is no longer liberation but supremacy. These companies realize women are neurotic and agreeable so they play into the female power fantasy and collective inferiority complex that is feminism to sell products. We’ve also unleashed male simping to the highest extent and demasculinized men so that they no longer see an issue with it. Many men feel something is wrong but they are so detached from their instincts and society has become so atomized for them to do anything about it. Giving women equal social power to men was like being the last surviving civilization on earth and giving the remaining toddlers handguns. The toddlers shouldn’t have the handguns and you could probably take it away from them if you tried but no one wants to get shot trying to do it. Plus the toddlers are cute so beating the shit out of them and taking the handguns away feels bad. You have a bunch of people saying “look we can’t have toddlers running around with handguns” but other people are saying “what do you want us to do? Hurt the toddlers to take them away? Plus what if we get shot trying do that?” Then another group has a bunch of candy that they found. This group realizes that people are scared of the toddlers and decides to get on the toddlers good side buy feeding them candy. The toddlers will get fat and unhealthy because they can’t help but eat the candy and in return the toddlers don’t shoot them and they can share in the toddler authority. The problem is, if all the toddlers get fat and unhealthy and develop diabetes, there goes your civilization because they will all die prematurely and there will be no more children to keep it going. The toddlers are happy but they are hurting themselves, the people feeding the toddlers are happy because they can share in the toddler authority, the scared people aren’t happy but atleast they don’t get shot, and the rest of the people are looking at the situation and saying “fuck it, I don’t want to live in a society run by handgun wielding toddlers” and leaving.
Haha yeah I sometimes hope for that too but I doubt we will be so lucky. It’s more plausible civilization will lead a slow painful death and the one that is rebuilt from its ashes will repeat all the same mistakes because they were never addressed in the first place. I don’t see the majority of men ever being able to not simp for women, it’s in built in our DNA males are disposable and females are valued. There is probably a solution to this but I haven’t been able to sus it out as of yet. The only feasible solution I see is technology which removes female dependency for reproduction or sexual satisfaction. If that were ever to occur, women would no longer hold any power over men or atleast not to the same extent they currently do. It wouldn’t happen over night but eventually men would no longer be able to justify simping for some random chick online or irl when they can go home and fuck an equally attractive robot sex slave and have kids via sperm insemination of an artificial womb.i
i´m impressed by your analogy , very spot on. And you are right , post industrial revolution accelerated the feminist agenda to such an alarming extent , not to mention the microplastic epedimic ,polution, processed food and GMO products which played a great role in the emasculation and feminization of men, industrial revolution truly was a disaster for the human species. i just pray that a huge geomagnetic excursion happen so that survivors rebuild the civilisation from scratch , and hopefully they don´t fall for the same grave mistakes again.
basically achieving singularity and transhumanism will put the female authority in a huge risk and might help men slip away from its tyrannical grip however , this seems like a very dark and dystopian future scenario, humans will have a hard time adjusting to this sudden change in society and love relationships , expect more mental illnesses will come from this. Civilisation collapse will be a disasterous scenario too because if industrial order collapses , massive famines and hunger will ensue killing billions of people. kali yuga age is here.Haha yeah I sometimes hope for that too but I doubt we will be so lucky. It’s more plausible civilization will lead a slow painful death and the one that is rebuilt from its ashes will repeat all the same mistakes because they were never addressed in the first place. I don’t see the majority of men ever being able to not simp for women, it’s in built in our DNA males are disposable and females are valued. There is probably a solution to this but I haven’t been able to sus it out as of yet. The only feasible solution I see is technology which removes female dependency for reproduction or sexual satisfaction. If that were ever to occur, women would no longer hold any power over men or atleast not to the same extent they currently do. It wouldn’t happen over night but eventually men would no longer be able to justify simping for some random chick online or irl when they can go home and fuck an equally attractive robot sex slave and have kids via sperm insemination of an artificial womb.
basically achieving singularity and transhumanism will put the female authority in a huge risk and might help men slip away from its tyrannical grip however , this seems like a very dark and dystopian future scenario, humans will have a hard time adjusting to this sudden change in society and love relationships , expect more mental illnesses will come from this. Civilisation collapse will be a disasterous scenario too because if industrial order collapses , massive famines and hunger will ensue killing billions of people. kali yuga age is here.



The mental illness will come but it will pass if we survive. Humans will become obsolete people will be free to do what they want. Society will undergo a massive push towards individuation of the psyche when there is nothing left to do.basically achieving singularity and transhumanism will put the female authority in a huge risk and might help men slip away from its tyrannical grip however , this seems like a very dark and dystopian future scenario, humans will have a hard time adjusting to this sudden change in society and love relationships , expect more mental illnesses will come from this. Civilisation collapse will be a disasterous scenario too because if industrial order collapses , massive famines and hunger will ensue killing billions of people. kali yuga age is here.
we missed up big time anyways, it´s so over i guessThe mental illness will come but it will pass if we survive. Humans will become obsolete people will be free to do what they want. Society will undergo a massive push towards individuation of the psyche when there is nothing left to do
It’s not your problem to deal with. If people want to burn civilization down let them. Just make sure you are far away from the fire.we missed up big time anyways, it´s so over i guess
i´m not that stressed about about it, i just dream i can afford to own a small farm in my thirties, hopefully i achieve this dream and escape the nightmarish city life.It’s not your problem to deal with. If people want to burn civilization down let them. Just make sure you are far away from the fire
Wagmii´m not that stressed about about it, i just dream i can afford to own a small farm in my thirties, hopefully i achieve this dream and escape the nightmarish city life.