Hamza suffers from curry bug eye syndrome

[CFW432]

Precisely, I noticed that as well, they have even more East Asian admixture! Also, Bengali Rajputs are a thing now?

idk i guess. Gonna have to research them.

 

[Gengar]

idk i guess. Gonna have to research them.

I think that’s what the image says, or maybe I misread it.

 

[SplashJuice]

Show me what the average Bengali looks like, when I look for it myself I’m accused of “cherry-picking.”

 

[Gengar]

View attachment 4315133View attachment 4315139View attachment 4315141View attachment 4315143

Karachi phenos. Some would pass in Punjab.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Other ethnic groups in India don’t have the same ratios, on the extreme end you have South Indian tribals who have up to 80% AASI, they don’t genetically cluster with even Dravidians. I didn’t say you’re actually Dravidian, I said the Tibetan DNA is the main reason you aren’t clustering with Dravidians. It’s exactly the Tibetan admixture that makes bengaljeets unique and that’s to be appreciated instead of something to hate on like I often see you do.

You said the absence of AASI DNA makes Bengalis as a result Dravidian - we would only be closer. This is counterfactual anyway. Even other ethnics groups cluster with dravidians and can have same ratios. You even pathetically say the same thing for Punjabs even though they have less. Do you want to redefine what Dravidian is?

I'm not celebrating or hating on anything. East Asian tibetans or south Asian dravidian ofc we share a similar ancestry - but you act like it's either/or when it's but/and. Anyway I'm tired of this retarded autistic take. We are Bengalis. It's you're the one insulting and making psuedo-theories so you can say bengalijeet.

 

[SecularIslamist]

Karachi phenos. Some would pass in Punjab.

U serious?

I'll send you the wedding pic - can't find it. It's one of those retarded family WhatsApp group where one person spams 100s of pics.

 

[ForSKJ]

They wouldn’t look out of place because Punjab is genetically diverse, we even have Punjabis with Dravidian genetics.

JFL there might be some dravidians in punjab due to the higher population and better opportunities but dravidians are not indigenous to punjab and there is no such thing as a punjabi with dravidian genetics. put a punjabi paki next to a dravidian and the differences are quite obvious. very easy to tell as the middle facial third in dravidians is compact and usually the shortest and widest third in the face. pakii punjabis' tallest third is usually the middle third due to the adaptation of requiring a longer, hooked nose with a higher radix that sits flush with the flat forehead, offering zero browridge protrusion as it was not necessary for their evolution. paki punjabis also tend to have longer faces with lower fwhr and inward gonions as well as a weak bizygomatic width. they also grow facial hair much quicker and higher on the face than dravidians. also the dravidian would have a lot more melanin than the paki

@Jason Voorhees @SecularIslamist @CFW432 @yussimania @SMVmaxxed #1 JIT @Lightskin Ethnic

 

[ForSKJ]

JFL there might be some dravidians in punjab due to the higher population and better opportunities but dravidians are not indigenous to punjab and there is no such thing as a punjabi with dravidian genetics. put a punjabi paki next to a dravidian and the differences are quite obvious. very easy to tell as the middle facial third in dravidians is compact and usually the shortest and widest third in the face. pakii punjabis' tallest third is usually the middle third due to the adaptation of requiring a longer, hooked nose with a higher radix that sits flush with the flat forehead, offering zero browridge protrusion as it was not necessary for their evolution. paki punjabis also tend to have longer faces with lower fwhr and inward gonions as well as a weak bizygomatic width. they also grow facial hair much quicker and higher on the face than dravidians. also the dravidian would have a lot more melanin than the paki

@Jason Voorhees @SecularIslamist @CFW432 @yussimania @SMVmaxxed #1 JIT @Lightskin Ethnic

@Gengar

 

[SecularIslamist]

View attachment 4315133View attachment 4315139View attachment 4315141View attachment 4315143

This is fairly accurate. It's ofc street pheno. You can find this anywhere just check a walking tour.

View attachment 4315133View attachment 4315139View attachment 4315141View attachment 4315143

This is fairly accurate. I would say in Syleth or chittagong it's a bit different - but I guess that's not "average".

It is also street pheno. So yes it's obviously a lower class look. If you go to a built up middle class area where people are more healthy they won't look like that - but this same dynamic exists in every country.

 

[idealistsynth]

Bug eyes seem to be a peak South Asian trait.

That would make sense. Everyone in South Asia has some AASI. Though I was thinking it was because Hamza’s family migrated from India to Pakistan.

how do I compare to hamza bhai?

 

[CorinthianLOX]

holy eye area

 

[CFW432]

View attachment 4315230holy eye area

ya, bug eye area is actually a neolithic iranian farmer/ caucasoid trait:

Also notice how the gets shorter and rounder when you go from iranid to north indid to indid



More aasi dna = wider and rounder face




Compare this to Veddid (abo phenotype) and Malid (purest veddid phenotype)

Notice how they have hunterish smaller eyes and wider round faces

 

[SecularIslamist]

It is also street pheno. So yes it's obviously a lower class look. If you go to a built up middle class area where people are more healthy they won't look like that - but this same dynamic exists in every country.

This is what I mean btw. The mode middle class pheno @Gengar I am in no way and implying this is average. On like some curries on here who tries to whitewash their own people - (oncluding a Bengali who tries to gookify Bengali). We are still easily the south Asian typical brown.

I'm saying if they were middle class, had a good diet etc. In these cases paki-passing becomes more evident than indian-passing. But even still I can see that they are Bengali from a mile away.

I see this every time I go to Whitechapel literally everywhere. Just look at walking tours





@JohnDoe maybe you think these girls look okay. But I just hate that look. I just don't like that face. Can't you see how distinctive they look here - especially that top vid. They look like fucking children. Maybe good for aging but I don't like these facial features. Even Indian facial features are better.

 

[yussimania]

the second picture is from india's west bengal which undoubtedly has a very high dravidian influence from migrations and mixing. they aren't bengali in the slightest.

this guy has a very wide palate and defined jaw, and a more acute gonial angle. All indicative of a dravidian phenotype. bonemass like this is nonexistent amongst pakistani punjabis and bangladeshi bengalis. note the low radix and wide alar base. genetic adaptation to humidity and warm air in the south.

View attachment 4314828
these 2 guys have very dravidian fwhr and browridge projections. no paki punjabis/bengalis have bone structures like this. most pakis have flatter, less sloped foreheads with rounder eyes that protrude slightly from the skull with longer hooked noses that have a higher radix. the guys in these picture have lower radixes and wider alar bases. not to mention the forward growth they posses would look out of place amongst pakistani punjabis or bangladeshi bengalis. lastly, the bizygomatic width is a textbook dravidian tell, it ties back in with the wide palate and forward growth consistent amongst dravidian populations.
View attachment 4314796

dravidians are in a league of their own amongst south asians and proper nutrition and beef consumption will only take them higher.

@Jason Voorhees @Lightskin Ethnic @yussimania @Gengar @SecularIslamist @CFW432

damn sums me up I'm a punjabi truecel

 

[ForSKJ]

damn sums me up I'm a punjabi truecel

as long as you have coloring halo you're golden. just be fair skin and high salary and your mother in law will kiss the ground you walk on

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

I

View attachment 4313703View attachment 4313702
What evolutionary process makes their eyes like this? Like what evolution took place to make it this “bad” I’ve noticed black Americans on avg have cooked eyes as well compared to other blacks dunno what causes that as well. My are area isn’t that great but I have luscious lashes and have what hoes call “fuck me sleepy eyes” or whatever so I was saved thank god


Why do pajeeet eyes look bad and he’s Pakistani so his eyes should be better than normal curries @Gengar @Jatt @Jason Voorhees @SecularIslamist

Im curry and my eyes are good with a slight crease and long lashes medium deep set

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

Bug eyes seem to be a peak South Asian trait.

That would make sense. Everyone in South Asia has some AASI. Though I was thinking it was because Hamza’s family migrated from India to Pakistan.

Hamzas Dravidian

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

W

View attachment 4313703View attachment 4313702
What evolutionary process makes their eyes like this? Like what evolution took place to make it this “bad” I’ve noticed black Americans on avg have cooked eyes as well compared to other blacks dunno what causes that as well. My are area isn’t that great but I have luscious lashes and have what hoes call “fuck me sleepy eyes” or whatever so I was saved thank god


Why do pajeeet eyes look bad and he’s Pakistani so his eyes should be better than normal curries @Gengar @Jatt @Jason Voorhees @SecularIslamist

orst big eyes are seen but black people have worse bug eyes

 

[ForSKJ]

Hamzas Dravidian

hell nah . that nigga is a pure paki punjabi

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

Il

hell nah . that nigga is a pure paki punjabi

no he isn’t lmao hamza is not he’s Indian dumbass the most shitskin person in my family is not even that brown + his eyes are fucking shit nigga no Punjabi has that eye area

 

[ForSKJ]

Il

no he isn’t lmao hamza is not he’s Indian dumbass the most shitskin person in my family is not even that brown + his eyes are fucking shit nigga no Punjabi has that eye area

he is your pakistani punjabi twin and deep in your heart you know it. sad af buddy go claim your ppl. hes even made a bunch of youtube videos about his pakistani punjabi sharabi father abusing him and you still want to deny. sad af

 

[unstable]

he is your pakistani punjabi twin and deep in your heart you know it. sad af buddy go claim your ppl. hes even made a bunch of youtube videos about his pakistani punjabi sharabi father abusing him and you still want to deny. sad af

do you think nutrition can ascend indians?

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

he is your pakistani punjabi twin and deep in your heart you know it. sad af buddy go claim your ppl. hes even made a bunch of youtube videos about his pakistani punjabi sharabi father abusing him and you still want to deny. sad af

JFL he’s never even claimed Punjabi he just says PAKISTANI

I’m the most shitskin in my family and if we walk into the same room I am about 5 shades lighter than him

+ nose slightly smaller + no bug eyes

Your definitely Indian

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I

Im curry and my eyes are good with a slight crease and long lashes medium deep set

Truly an god amoungst your kin

Go spread your poopjeet genes to the other poopjeets who lack this blessing from turd flinging poop god Vishnu

 

[CFW432]

I thought bug eyes were sorta bulging eyes, with at least mild upper eyelid exposure. The examples you showed both don’t have bug eyes (obviously).

theres no such thing as "bulging eyes" on its own.

Bulging eyes means lack of skeletal structure around the eyeball to support it. Its skeletal recession in the same way someone has a recessed jawline/chin because their jaw bone didnt develop.

AASI were hunter gatherers that had hunterish/hooded eyes because they literally had perfect skeletal structure to support their eyeballs such as a forward browridge and forward cheekbones.

Recessed skeletal structure is a neolithic farmer trait that zagros/neolithic farmers had. AKA "bug eyes"/bulging eyes is a neolithic farmer trait.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

theres no such thing as "bulging eyes" on its own.

Bulging eyes means lack of skeletal structure around the eyeball to support it. Its skeletal recession in the same way someone has a recessed jawline/chin because their jaw bone didnt develop.

AASI were hunter gatherers that had hunterish/hooded eyes because they literally had perfect skeletal structure to support their eyeballs such as a forward browridge and forward cheekbones.

Recessed skeletal structure is a neolithic farmer trait that zagros/neolithic farmers had. AKA "bug eyes"/bulging eyes is a neolithic farmer trait.

Then curries have no eye bones then lol. Black Americans also have this issue I have noticed but idiots think it’s a “black thing” when it’s a American black thing not a global one

 

[CFW432]

Then curries have no eye bones then lol. Black Americans also have this issue I have noticed but idiots think it’s a “black thing” when it’s a American black thing not a global one

So this is gonna sound psuedo as hell but here me out so this is how it goes.

Being Hunter Gatherer is humanity's most natural/animalistic way of living. Hunter gatherers are 100% shaped by their environment because they live the most naturalistic life that a human being can live. This means humans physically develop their skeletal structure peak living this way. Over thousands of years humans living this way become thicker, stockier, wide thick skulls, forward browridges, forward cheekbones, etc etc.

Basically thick, dense, wide bones = apex of human physical development.

Farming is actually humanity's most recent way of life only started 10,000 years ago. Since farming is well "lazier" and more "sedentary" compared to literally hunter gathering, human skeletal structure starts to become more slender and less robust. Over thousands of years humans who live this lifestyle become more slender and less "robust", theres a term for it, its called "gracilization":

Since farming was started in the middle east before anywhere else, middle eastern people tend be slendier and have longer faces, and more bug eyes, and long noses etc etc compared to other people around the world who have more ancestry from other populations who were hunter gatherers.

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

Truly an god amoungst your kin

Go spread your poopjeet genes to the other poopjeets who lack this blessing from turd flinging poop god Vishnu

Your a black bug eyed overweight FUCK who got colonized by Christian’s

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

So this is gonna sound psuedo as hell but here me out so this is how it goes.

Being Hunter Gatherer is humanity's most natural/animalistic way of living. Hunter gatherers are 100% shaped by their environment because they live the most naturalistic life that a human being can live. This means humans physically develop their skeletal structure peak living this way. Over thousands of years humans living this way become thicker, stockier, wide thick skulls, forward browridges, forward cheekbones, etc etc.

Basically thick, dense, wide bones = apex of human physical development.

Farming is actually humanity's most recent way of life only started 10,000 years ago. Since farming is well "lazier" and more "sedentary" compared to literally hunter gathering, human skeletal structure starts to become more slender and less robust. Over thousands of years humans who live this lifestyle become more slender and less "robust", theres a term for it, its called "gracilization":


View attachment 4315787

Since farming was started in the middle east before anywhere else, middle eastern people tend be slendier and have longer faces, and more bug eyes, and long noses etc etc compared to other people around the world who have more ancestry from other populations who were hunter gatherers.

Makes sense to a degree ngl.

But many groups like amazons etc look subhuman despite being hunter gatherers. The Hazabe tribe look like archaic niggers from 20k years ago and they don’t farm they are the lowest of the race

So I don’t believe this is the reason

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Your a black bug eyed overweight FUCK who got colonized by Christian’s

lol why you tweakin? Did Vishnu not kiss you with his cow poop throwing festival ?

The whole world was colonised snd still is by the European demons, I wouldn’t call cumskins “Christian’s” kinda a Oxymoron I respect modern whites a bit more than their forefathers because they at least don’t pretend to belive In Christianity and just openly oppose it and every religion.
So yeah the world was colonised by European demonic barbarians.

I don’t have bug eyes like you, I’m not a pajeet. I’m not fat either thankfully but I could be leaner. Your rage is irritating I’m putting you on my ignore as you always reply like a cunt for no reason

 

[Uehdbwidbfngj]

lol why you tweakin? Did Vishnu not kiss you with his cow poop throwing festival ?

The whole world was colonised snd still is by the European demons, I wouldn’t call cumskins “Christian’s” kinda a Oxymoron I respect modern whites a bit more than their forefathers because they at least don’t pretend to belive In Christianity and just openly oppose it and every religion.
So yeah the world was colonised by European demonic barbarians.

I don’t have bug eyes like you, I’m not a pajeet. I’m not fat either thankfully but I could be leaner. Your rage is irritating I’m putting you on my ignore as you always reply like a cunt for no reason

You are shitskin black buddy I am not a Hindu pajeet bitch nigga you thinking I’m a Hindu doesn’t even bother I also have a deep hatred for Hindus so tbh I don5 even care you making fun of Hindus

 

[vernier]

Mirin that this thread is of 3 pages

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Mirin that this thread is of 3 pages

Honestly I’m more shocked than you and I’m quite annoyed by it all. This thread I made On a whim and look at its traction compared to my actually high effort threads. This forums a joke

 

[Gengar]

You said the absence of AASI DNA makes Bengalis as a result Dravidian - we would only be closer. This is counterfactual anyway. Even other ethnics groups cluster with dravidians and can have same ratios. You even pathetically say the same thing for Punjabs even though they have less. Do you want to redefine what Dravidian is?

I'm not celebrating or hating on anything. East Asian tibetans or south Asian dravidian ofc we share a similar ancestry - but you act like it's either/or when it's but/and. Anyway I'm tired of this retarded autistic take. We are Bengalis. It's you're the one insulting and making psuedo-theories so you can say bengalijeet.

I said the absence of Tibetan DNA would make you genetically cluster with Dravidians (and again, that’s because you share the about the same ratios of AASI + Zagros, but especially high levels of AASI is the reason why). I provided evidence, but for some reason you’re getting offended.

Regarding Punjabis, yes, it’s true for them as well. Punjabis aren’t an ethnic group, we’re a socio-linguistic group, that means that your actual genetics don’t matter. Some Punjabis actually cluster with Dravidians because they’re genetically Dravidian. Obviously they’re classified as Indo-Aryans due to linguistics, since Punjabi is an Indo-Aryan language, but they’re genetically Dravidian.

You’re the one with a total misunderstanding of what I’m saying, distorting my words because you can’t accept factual information, brushing it off as “retarded autistic takes” doesn’t make you any less wrong.

 

[Gengar]

U serious?

I'll send you the wedding pic - can't find it. It's one of those retarded family WhatsApp group where one person spams 100s of pics.

Karachi is home to Muhajirs, they literally came from places like India and Bangladesh, so of course I’m serious.

 

[Gengar]

JFL there might be some dravidians in punjab due to the higher population and better opportunities but dravidians are not indigenous to punjab and there is no such thing as a punjabi with dravidian genetics. put a punjabi paki next to a dravidian and the differences are quite obvious. very easy to tell as the middle facial third in dravidians is compact and usually the shortest and widest third in the face. pakii punjabis' tallest third is usually the middle third due to the adaptation of requiring a longer, hooked nose with a higher radix that sits flush with the flat forehead, offering zero browridge protrusion as it was not necessary for their evolution. paki punjabis also tend to have longer faces with lower fwhr and inward gonions as well as a weak bizygomatic width. they also grow facial hair much quicker and higher on the face than dravidians. also the dravidian would have a lot more melanin than the paki

@Jason Voorhees @SecularIslamist @CFW432 @yussimania @SMVmaxxed #1 JIT @Lightskin Ethnic

The genetically Dravidian ones are actually indigenous Punjabis. They didn’t migrate from elsewhere. I didn’t say they’re Dravidian migrants. I said they genetically cluster with them. They’re also dark-skinned and have good bones. Punjabis aren’t a single ethnic group; we are a socio-linguistic group with very diverse genetics.

 

[Gengar]

how do I compare to hamza bhai?

I don’t remember what you lol like bhaijaan.

 

[Gengar]

ya, bug eye area is actually a neolithic iranian farmer/ caucasoid trait:




View attachment 4315247View attachment 4315248View attachment 4315249

Also notice how the gets shorter and rounder when you go from iranid to north indid to indid



More aasi dna = wider and rounder face




Compare this to Veddid (abo phenotype) and Malid (purest veddid phenotype)


View attachment 4315264View attachment 4315265


Notice how they have hunterish smaller eyes and wider round faces

Those aren’t even “bug eyes.” These are bug eyes:

Dravidians have considerable Zagros admixture (often up to 30-35%), yet they don’t have these kind of eye areas, if it was actually solely responsible for it; then many Dravidians would also have bug eyes, but they don’t.

It’s probably the mixture of AASI-Zagros-Steppe that’s causing it. Since all South Asians share these three ancestral components, it seems it’s the proportion of these ancestral components that determine bug eyes. What that proportion is, I’m not sure. But I don’t think it’s correct to single out one ancestral component, especially when the same component makes up ar least around one third of the Dravidian genetic make-up.

 

[Gengar]

This is what I mean btw. The mode middle class pheno @Gengar I am in no way and implying this is average. On like some curries on here who tries to whitewash their own people - (oncluding a Bengali who tries to gookify Bengali). We are still easily the south Asian typical brown.

I'm saying if they were middle class, had a good diet etc. In these cases paki-passing becomes more evident than indian-passing. But even still I can see that they are Bengali from a mile away.

I see this every time I go to Whitechapel literally everywhere. Just look at walking tours





@JohnDoe maybe you think these girls look okay. But I just hate that look. I just don't like that face. Can't you see how distinctive they look here - especially that top vid. They look like fucking children. Maybe good for aging but I don't like these facial features. Even Indian facial features are better.

The lighter skin probably comes from the significant Tibetan + some Steppe admixture.

 

[Gengar]

as long as you have coloring halo you're golden. just be fair skin and high salary and your mother in law will kiss the ground you walk on

Coloring is irrelevant. It’s about bones.

 

[yussimania]

Those aren’t even “bug eyes.” These are bug eyes:

View attachment 4316520

Dravidians have considerable Zagros admixture (often up to 30-35%), yet they don’t have these kind of eye areas, if it was actually solely responsible for it; then many Dravidians would also have bug eyes, but they don’t.

It’s probably the mixture of AASI-Zagros-Steppe that’s causing it. Since all South Asians share these three ancestral components, it seems it’s the proportion of these ancestral components that determine bug eyes. What that proportion is, I’m not sure. But I don’t think it’s correct to single out one ancestral component, especially when the same component makes up ar least around one third of the Dravidian genetic make-up.

this is what i believe too it's the mixture of all of them. once again another reason to not race mix . Anyway i Dmd you about what dna test kit to get 23andme or ancestry?

 

[Gengar]

this is what i believe too it's the mixture of all of them. once again another reason to not race mix . Anyway i Dmd you about what dna test kit to get 23andme or ancestry?

My bad, I didn’t see it. Go with LivingDNA. You get deeper subclades than 23andme for your haplogroups. It’s a UK-based company as well. And the price is around the same also. Highly recommend that one, I used it for my family members. Plus it’s a simple cheek swab test.

 

[SecularIslamist]

I said the absence of Tibetan DNA would make you genetically cluster with Dravidians (and again, that’s because you share the about the same ratios of AASI + Zagros, but especially high levels of AASI is the reason why). I provided evidence, but for some reason you’re getting offended.

Regarding Punjabis, yes, it’s true for them as well. Punjabis aren’t an ethnic group, we’re a socio-linguistic group, that means that your actual genetics don’t matter. Some Punjabis actually cluster with Dravidians because they’re genetically Dravidian. Obviously they’re classified as Indo-Aryans due to linguistics, since Punjabi is an Indo-Aryan language, but they’re genetically Dravidian.

You’re the one with a total misunderstanding of what I’m saying, distorting my words because you can’t accept factual information, brushing it off as “retarded autistic takes” doesn’t make you any less wrong.

No one's denying they cluster with Dravidians and have relatively high AASI. I am not disputing your facts. I am disputing your claim on th basis of facts which you want to stretch out for your claims. You can't seem to separate the difference. I never denied we have shared ancestry - so does every other ethnic group in south Asia. We just have relatively higher AASI on average.

Karachi is home to Muhajirs, they literally came from places like India and Bangladesh, so of course I’m serious.

I wasn't talking about them. Anyway I doubt the displaced from Bangladesh went all the way to Pakistan after all they were Hindu.

The lighter skin probably comes from the significant Tibetan + some Steppe admixture.

It doesn't matter where it comes from do you see anyone Dravidian passing?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

No one's denying they cluster with Dravidians and have relatively high AASI. I am not disputing your facts. I am disputing your claim on th basis of facts which you want to stretch out for your claims. You can't seem to separate the difference. I never denied we have shared ancestry - so does every other ethnic group in south Asia. We just have relatively higher AASI on average.



I wasn't talking about them. Anyway I doubt the displaced from Bangladesh went all the way to Pakistan after all they were Hindu.


It doesn't matter where it comes from do you see anyone Dravidian passing?

You accept Pakistanis and Indians and benglais are related this is amazing south azn greater India super power ready when?

 

[SecularIslamist]

You accept Pakistanis and Indians and benglais are related

I never denied lmao. We are all south Asian.

Actually I don't like attacking Indians that much unlike Gengar and some other curries because I know same finger can be pointed back at curries - even if it's a lesser extent. Indians born abroad are far better and civilised anyway. Admittedly even more than Bengalis and pakis.

Also hating each other if just a Jewish division tactic and drag each other down with it.

this is amazing south azn greater India super power ready when?

Hopefully never unless they give up their streetshitting and cow worship. Or if they accept living under neo-Mughal State and paying Jizya.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

I never denied lmao. We are all south Asian.

Actually I don't like attacking Indians that much unlike Gengar and some other curries because I know same finger can be pointed back at curries - even if it's a lesser extent. Indians born abroad are far better and civilised anyway. Admittedly even more than Bengalis and pakis.

Also hating each other if just a Jewish division tactic and drag each other down with it.

Hopefully never unless they give up their streetshitting and cow worship. Or if they accept living under neo-Mughal State and paying Jizya.

I’ll only allow a pan curry state if you give me 1k of your stacies my fetishes must be met

If you don’t donate that many to me then you’ll forever be separated. Yes treat me like a devil from Chainsawman you need to make contracts with me to get what you want

Jokes aside this is very legit, it’s why I pick on Africans only with other blacks I never do it when other races are present because I know cumskins and deathnics will use hatred towards specific black ethnicities as a proxy to attack all of us.

Chinks and Latinos are the races that haven’t realised this so when cumskins attack Chinese the Koreans and Japs don’t realise Chinese is a synonym for all East Asian. Goood thing your aware of the white supremacist divide tactic. I don’t even openly attack Muslim blacks who are doing genocides in Africa in front of non blacks, only call them out when I’m in full black spaces and it’s more to get the Muslim ones to understand their priority shouldn’t be to kill peoole to spread a toxic Arab ideology

 

[SecularIslamist]

I’ll only allow a pan curry state if you give me 1k of your stacies my fetishes must be met

If you don’t donate that many to me then you’ll forever be separated. Yes treat me like a devil from Chainsawman you need to make contracts with me to get what you want

You can have them as soon as you say the shahada.

They hasn't been a south Asian Stacey since Aishwarya Rai in the mid 90s btw.

Jokes aside this is very legit, it’s why I pick on Africans only with other blacks I never do it when other races are present because I know cumskins and deathnics will use hatred towards specific black ethnicities as a proxy to attack all of us.

Yeah it's generallt fine too discuss between. But if this hatred boils over on an international scale - especially like it has done between Pakistan-India. Then you've got to the stage where one person's criticism will be a proxy for everyone. Like this streetshitter and pajeet insult was promoted in Pakistani circles but now is basically used against all south Asians.

Just look how many Americunts on this forum hate on curries but probably never seen or interacted with one.

Chinks and Latinos are the races that haven’t realised this so when cumskins attack Chinese the Koreans and Japs don’t realise Chinese is a synonym for all East Asian. Goood thing your aware of the white supremacist divide tactic. I don’t even openly attack Muslim blacks who are doing genocides in Africa in front of non blacks, only call them out when I’m in full black spaces and it’s more to get the Muslim ones to understand their priority shouldn’t be to kill peoole to spread a toxic Arab ideology

Are you talking about Sudan? The RSF are secular nationalist backed by the Jewish state of UAE. The 'Islamist' don't ever oppose religion - full stop. Even if they want more Islam. Ofc I'm not talking about jihadis of salafist orientation - but it's arguably that even most of them are fine..

Really have Islamists ever opposed religious Christians in the modern age? Their problems have ALWAYS been with secular Christian. Even in the Balkans which is religiously divided but let's be real they are all secular cucks to the same degree.

The real enemies are the secular cumskin and their Jewish allies.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

You can have them as soon as you say the shahada.

They hasn't been a south Asian Stacey since Aishwarya Rai in the mid 90s btw.

Yeah it's generallt fine too discuss between. But if this hatred boils over on an international scale - especially like it has done between Pakistan-India. Then you've got to the stage where one person's criticism will be a proxy for everyone. Like this streetshitter and pajeet insult was promoted in Pakistani circles but now is basically used against all south Asians.

Just look how many Americunts on this forum hate on curries but probably never seen or interacted with one.


Are you talking about Sudan? The RSF are secular nationalist backed by the Jewish state of UAE. The 'Islamist' don't ever oppose religion - full stop. Even if they want more Islam. Ofc I'm not talking about jihadis of salafist orientation - but it's arguably that even most of them are fine..

Really have Islamists ever opposed religious Christians in the modern age? Their problems have ALWAYS been with secular Christian. Even in the Balkans which is religiously divided but let's be real they are all secular cucks to the same degree.

The real enemies are the secular cumskin and their Jewish allies.

Cumskins hate on everybody they are devils affect just a shame deathnics intend of siding with whites chose to side with their colonisers obeyed of us but all ethnics are getting their wake up call and regretting not siding with the BBC against the Pinkoid supremacists

Nar I’m not speaking about the Sudan I am just speaking about diaspora needs we all having rn. For example Jamaicans and black
Americans are beefing over this hurricane Melissa for example.


And yeah the Pakistan India conflict is where a lot of people get ammo to attack curries form and it’s very sad you even see Hindus being pick mes saying shit like “see me cumskin man we aren’t like those savage Mohammeden pakis Wes gooood boys we goooood sepoys” Vivek ramaswarmi and the New York mayor have proven that berries just hate curries no matter what they do say of believe and this is why south Asians need to stop attacking blacks because we unironically are the only race that doesn’t attack you lot infact we like you guys cos your dark skinned but you guys hate on us trying to cosy up to the pink and Gayrab devils who enslave you guys and bully you lot

The deathnic world is get t their wakeup call that’s why you noticed blacks for once aren’t caping for any other race we are sitting this one out and letting whitey truly show you how he feels

 

[SecularIslamist]

Cumskins hate on everybody they are devils affect just a shame deathnics intend of siding with whites chose to side with their colonisers obeyed of us but all ethnics are getting their wake up call and regretting not siding with the BBC against the Pinkoid supremacists

It's been like this from the start. We are in a period where everyone is acting like they are decolonised and proud, but really just abetted by cumskins. They divided and conquered ethnics in their own lands. Now they do it with tools from afar.

Nar I’m not speaking about the Sudan I am just speaking about diaspora needs we all having rn. For example Jamaicans and black
Americans are beefing over this hurricane Melissa for example.

What business do black Americans have with Carribbean Jamaicans JFL. I didn't even know there was a beef lmao.

And yeah the Pakistan India conflict is where a lot of people get ammo to attack curries form and it’s very sad you even see Hindus being pick mes saying shit like “see me cumskin man we aren’t like those savage Mohammeden pakis Wes gooood boys we goooood sepoys” Vivek ramaswarmi and the New York mayor have proven that berries just hate curries no matter what they do say of believe and this is why south Asians need to stop attacking blacks because we unironically are the only race that doesn’t attack you lot infact we like you guys cos your dark skinned but you guys hate on us trying to cosy up to the pink and Gayrab devils who enslave you guys and bully you lot

Yeah Vivek is the most cuck. Just take a look at his replies on Twitter. I can remember after New York's mayor election he was saying the right wing should be above identity politics because that's something the left plays too. He's right. But just look up the people he is trying to appease JFLL. They just can't see past his origins

The deathnic world is get t their wakeup call that’s why you noticed blacks for once aren’t caping for any other race we are sitting this one out and letting whitey truly show you how he feels

I've always said blacks - especially African American are far ahead of any others in dealing with cumskins because they've had 300-ish year relationship over their and living

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

It's been like this from the start. We are in a period where everyone is acting like they are decolonised and proud, but really just abetted by cumskins. They divided and conquered ethnics in their own lands. Now they do it with tools from afar.

What business do black Americans have with Carribbean Jamaicans JFL. I didn't even know there was a beef lmao.

Yeah Vivek is the most cuck. Just take a look at his replies on Twitter. I can remember after New York's mayor election he was saying the right wing should be above identity politics because that's something the left plays too. He's right. But just look up the people he is trying to appease JFLL. They just can't see past his origins

I've always said blacks - especially African American are far ahead of any others in dealing with cumskins because they've had 300-ish year relationship over their and living

I’m glad you get it cos I’m sick and tired of gay ethnics acting like they have “independence” day it’s pathetic like nigga you weren’t ever independant your nations are still cumskins owned your leaders are elected by cumskin demons who put your leaders in place and whenever they step out alike they fund rebellions to replace guy with a new guy

Colonailism
Never ended it just took a new form and that form is covert and using puppets. The Persians had an term for this it was called “satrapy” a Satrap is one that’s colonised by the empire however the public
Face of the region etc are all natives this takes heat of the Persian elites when shit goes wrong but if the elite rebels they’ll invade and town stall a new one usually by formenting rebellions. This is how cumskins operate in both our nations. Bangladesh is still a colony and so is all of Africa including the north, Nafris act like they ain’t but look no further than what happened to Gaddafi. This is the REAL REASON why they support Isreal because Isreal is are whit European invaders no different than the cumskins that’s why they support Isreal and their crusade against the native brown Palestinians.

You wouldn’t know there’s beef between Caribs and black Americans because we keep it to black spaces only that’s my point that’s how it should be we won’t roast eachother in front of non blacks though but when it’s jsut us it’s on .

Yeah Vivek is Buckbroken I member Indians saying “seypoy Syndrome” is your version of Cooon and I like it so ima roll with it . He’s just upset that the right hates him cos he is pro curry immigration, has a Hindu wife and is brown.

Yep black Americans are experts in white supremacy they are the only group that actively truly are against cumskin world domination thats why they always slander black Americans but have to parasite off black Americans even the automobile aeroplanes, door knobs and light bulbs everyone had a black hand involved I’m not lying google this but they act like blacks did fuck all. Black Americans are what I call the “final frontier”