Handicapped spic has a cute gf

most your takes about looks are shitty but on this one you're right. these are fucking bitter indian incels. this forum is full of them
Thanks, though I’m curious.. which looks related takes did you disagree with?
 
  • +1
Reactions: AuraMaxxing and Deleted member 114837
Thanks, though I’m curious.. which looks related takes did you disagree with?
the thread about eye area. the trait you pinpointed is way too much irrelevant compared to pfl for example.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AuraMaxxing and greycel
It doesn’t matter what his rating is to the rest of society you stupid fucking greycel
The girl he is with views him as subjectively Chad+

Every LTN in the world has a girl out there who will think him to be subjectively her type
What I don't get is the "eh he is still ltn" as if it would have even mattered if he were htn, chad or whatever. His life is done because he can't walk, not because of looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
the thread about eye area. the trait you pinpointed is way too much irrelevant compared to pfl for example.
The one regarding smooth undereyes?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 114837
The one regarding smooth undereyes?
Yes. it's cool to have but long pfl >>>> in eye area. everything else is easy fix.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
It doesn’t matter what his rating is to the rest of society you stupid fucking greycel
The girl he is with views him as subjectively Chad+

Every LTN in the world has a girl out there who will think him to be subjectively her type
bla bla
 
Yes. it's cool to have but long pfl >>>> in eye area. everything else is easy fix.
I feel I’m the best to answer this considering I’ve got very long PFL

I think PFL being bad does you more of a disservice than any other eye related trait, other than IPD/ESR (canthal tilt, undereye, etc).
A lot of ethnics for example have high PFL
But from what I’ve personally noticed, everybody who has appeal has that smooth undereye:
IMG 2484
IMG 2270
IMG 2269


With no crease. I was watching this Polish Orchestra, and I came across this guy:
IMG 2501
IMG 2499


Polish people especially have some of the best craniofacial development, and they have that smooth undereye I’m talking about. Lots of people were talking about how beautiful they were, even though lots didn’t have the best features/harmony
Today’s appeal is very closely linked to craniofacial development

I’ve got decent harmony and a striking eye area, but a very downgrown maxilla
To be a HTN devoid of any large falios, all you really need is to have good development during your formative years

Or the perception of it through projected infras + undereye fat
 
  • +1
Reactions: AuraMaxxing
A lot of ethnics for example have high PFL
it's easy to give yourself cat/fox eyes if you know the right doctors like i do and the knowledge. And it's also extremely easy to get smooth under eye without going hardmaxxes just soft medical maxxes. I have the most knowledge out of this shithole.
But you can't widen your pfl realistically unless you're willing to undergo a life threatening surgery. That's why it's the most important trait. No most ethnics don't have wide pfl, very few people have wide pfl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
it's easy to give yourself cat/fox eyes if you know the right doctors like i do and the knowledge. And it's also extremely easy to get smooth under eye without going hardmaxxes just soft medical maxxes. I have the most knowledge out of this shithole.
But you can't widen your pfl realistically unless you're willing to undergo a life threatening surgery. That's why it's the most important trait. No most ethnics don't have wide pfl, very few people have wide pfl.
PFL has an inverse correlation with deepsettedness of eyes
Ethnics have less deepsetted eyes
If you’re going about it from the angle of how feasible it is for every trait to be improved sure yeah.. nothing short of a tripod osteotomy will help. I was thinking more along the lines of, if I could choose all other to be average-above average, which would I pick to be best.

Actually I have read a paper before that fractional CO2 laser has helped widen PFL:
You might like to read this too:

And also what you are looking to improve isn’t PFL, but percieved PFL which can be through increasing eyelash length/tinting darker on the outer corners + curling outer corners
You can also make the perception of it longer by increasing what’s around it.. the eyebrows to over extend beyond + becoming thinner as they go out

extremely easy to get smooth under eye without going hardmaxxes just soft medical maxxes
What is the solution?
I’ve been doing research and it’s saddled infras + fat graft.. but they are both hard/soft maxes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AuraMaxxing
It doesn’t matter what his rating is to the rest of society you stupid fucking greycel
The girl he is with views him as subjectively Chad+

Every LTN in the world has a girl out there who will think him to be subjectively her type
over greycel has turned into a bluepiller :feelsrope:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
I’ve been doing research and it’s saddled infras + fat graft.. but they are both hard/soft maxes.
intra muscular fillers with miracu threads and mediojugal fillers and cog threads.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
His chorizo is massive
 
And also what you are looking to improve isn’t PFL, but percieved PFL which can be through increasing eyelash length/tinting darker on the outer corners + curling outer corners
i already do that, lash lift, and use very natural looking contacts, and my pfl is already great but can be better. now that i got fully almond eyes it's even better. but i still need more.
the eyebrows to over extend beyond + becoming thinner as they go out
wdym extactly? i have extremely long brows and lashes. should i trim it more?
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Ethnics have less deepsetted eyes
yes exactly what i said, you took it the wrong way, the fact they have more bug eyes don't make their pfl bigger. it's just a false perception.
Actually I have read a paper before that fractional CO2 laser has helped widen PFL:
You might like to read this too:
tldr? i hightly doubt co2 laser can widen the eyelids lenght. I already do CO2 treatment 2-3x every year for collagen maxxing. might as well ask my knowlegeable surgeon if that's legit. but i highly doubt it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Also we can do everything implants do with osteotomies or "soft" medical treatments - fillers, and threads -, implants are extremely retarded, will eat your bones, and will need to be removed every now and then. not accounting for the high price either. @greycel and fat graft for under eyes is very risky, no surgeon can predict the looks of your under eyes after a fat graft. intra muscular sub Q under eye fillers is the safest thing to do, and the least risky. I will use fat graft for people that are quite old and lack a lot of fat pads like in the midface, where it can be overfilled without looking fake. But never in the under eyes. I had the same issues as you. All i'm telling you is money worthy. trust me on this.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
intra muscular fillers with miracu threads and mediojugal fillers and cog threads.
Ah, I figured
I don’t see the point in temporary fixes, and being a slave to constantly looksmaxxing
I’ll be going for a permanent solution

Speaking of fat grafting there’s a very unknown thing nobody has talked about even once, that’s a game changer. I’m going to make a thread on it very soon, so when I do I’ll remember to tag you in it

wdym extactly? i have extremely long brows and lashes. should i trim it more?
So the further out you go the more darker they should be. Don’t make the colour gradient change too steep though
Also curl more on the outer than evenly for your entire eyelash. It’s all to do with perception, which is psychological
You want to highlight the idea of extension towards the edges as much as possible, which involves the idea of a gradient (either through how much you tint darker or how much curl you do).

But it should still be within the range of normalcy, for which the curl should be even throughout but just on the edges it should be curled slightly more.. and same for tinting — don’t make it much darker on the sides compared to rest of your eyelashes

For the eyebrows you want it to over extend, but you see something like this for example:
1747065256187

His positioning could be lowered, but the vertical height of the brows decreases at the edges, making it perceived to be sharper = longer

tldr? i hightly doubt co2 laser can widen the eyelids lenght. I already do CO2 treatment 2-3x every year for collagen maxxing. might as well ask my knowlegeable surgeon if that's legit. but i highly doubt it.
Instead of doing multiple fractional lasers which I haven’t read on the results of overuse, but I wouldn’t recommend it.. even if they are non fractional. Do 1 fractional laser and it’ll last for years. I’m only personally planning on getting one
You should read it fully since you benefit from it
But 82% say gains in PFL
 
But 82% say gains in PFL
i read both articles nowhere it says it widen pfl. If anything they explains ways to not create scleral show. I don't see where you saw that.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
His positioning could be lowered, but the vertical height of the brows decreases at the edges, making it perceived to be sharper = longer
So basically make your brows the longest possible?
If i send you my brows can you tell me what can be done further to max out pfl perception?
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
Also we can do everything implants do with osteotomies or "soft" medical treatments - fillers, and threads -, implants are extremely retarded, will eat your bones, and will need to be removed every now and then. not accounting for the high price either. @greycel and fat graft for under eyes is very risky, no surgeon can predict the looks of your under eyes after a fat graft. intra muscular sub Q under eye fillers is the safest thing to do, and the least risky. I will use fat graft for people that are quite old and lack a lot of fat pads like in the midface, where it can be overfilled without looking fake. But never in the under eyes. I had the same issues as you. All i'm telling you is money worthy. trust me on this.
I’ve seen results of undereye fat grafts
It’s a safer place to inject than for improving your UEE I’ve seen before

Anyways, here’s a random pic from study I just found:
1747065625613


Similar % from what I remember, though above eyes were slightly more risky

And implants especially PEEK has no resorption compared to silicone, so there’s hardly any bone loss. Also it integrates well with bone, and will never have to be removed (there’s been cases of some bone growing above it)
 
I don’t see the point in temporary fixes, and being a slave to constantly looksmaxxing
it's not temporary, after 3 sessions it becomes quite permanent. And fillers also last semi permanently. I had fillers done 3 years ago and it's still there fully. And threads become permanent after 3 treatments
 
  • JFL
Reactions: greycel
I’ve seen results of undereye fat grafts
It’s a safer place to inject than for improving your UEE I’ve seen before
i consulted with the best under eye fat grafters. And the most honest ones told me nobody can tell how much will stays or leave, creating permanent assymetries. let alone removing it which is extremely hard unlike with fillers.
With fillers what you inject is what you keep. The only advantage of fat graft is the hyperpigmation subtle improvement because fat is fuller than fillers that are transparent. But both last semi permanently. Fat graft isn't permanent at all. And as i said unpredictable.
 
i read both articles nowhere it says it widen pfl. If anything they explains ways to not create scleral show. I don't see where you saw that.
IMG 2503


it's not temporary, after 3 sessions it becomes quite permanent. And fillers also last semi permanently. I had fillers done 3 years ago and it's still there fully. And threads become permanent after 3 treatments
Can you verify @Orc
From what I remember, It’s temporary. Makes sense too
If it held it permanently in place, it would look incredibly uncanny as you age, as it’s resisting natural order (sagging)

i consulted with the best under eye fat grafters. And the most honest ones told me nobody can tell how much will stays or leave, creating permanent assymetries. let alone removing it which is extremely hard unlike with fillers.
With fillers what you inject is what you keep. The only advantage of fat graft is the hyperpigmation subtle improvement because fat is fuller than fillers that are transparent. But both last semi permanently. Fat graft isn't permanent at all. And as i said unpredictable.
Those lumps that you’re talking about are rare. I saw a statistic before, I remember it was much lower than I had initially thought
Also, you can fill out more
Also, this would exist for above the eyes too
Fat lasts permanently if it integrates, and your body would accept anywhere between iirc 30-80% of initial fat from what @NZb6Air said.. which depends on many factors such as how much you inject, and if it’s good quality fat - e.g. visceral fat

@chrishell @SteveRogers @idkwhattoputhere @key —what do you guys think?
 
View attachment 3727528


Can you verify @Orc
From what I remember, It’s temporary. Makes sense too
If it held it permanently in place, it would look incredibly uncanny as you age, as it’s resisting natural order (sagging)


Those lumps that you’re talking about are rare. I saw a statistic before, I remember it was much lower than I had initially thought
Also, you can fill out more
Also, this would exist for above the eyes too
Fat lasts permanently if it integrates, and your body would accept anywhere between iirc 30-80% of initial fat from what @NZb6Air said.. which depends on many factors such as how much you inject, and if it’s good quality fat - e.g. visceral fat

@chrishell @SteveRogers @idkwhattoputhere @key —what do you guys think?
If you want to improve PFL, it's hard to do that directly, but in any case producing the illusion of a higher PFL by closing in the bony orbits, reducing uee, and ensuring non-negative hooding is typically enough for most cases.

It depends on the nature of the undereye and midface deficiency whether you do implants and/or fat grafts but I would avoid fillers in this area because of migration risks. It is true fat retention is unpredictable and multiple sessions are required but that is a risk I'd take over the filler-associated risks personally.

I am okay with fillers to the upper eyelids though. They don't migrate as much up there.
 
  • +1
Reactions: greycel
latina kween :Comfy::Comfy:
 
@FaceandBBC
 
  • +1
Reactions: FaceandBBC
WTF HOW BRO???? I'm paying out the ass for escorts and getting ghosted by fat ltn's I planned to meet up with on BLK while this disabled ese has a whole wife!!!!
 
You need to learn to shut the fuck up

He’s found a rare girl who’s clearly better than majority of women
+ he’s gotten laid meanwhile you’re a jealous incel
How TF do they even smash
 
Blackpill doesnt exist in beanerland tbh
 
Cripple halo
 
And so what? let people live. Fucking bitter incels i swear.
No, fuck that. Why can't the people who chide us for our looks let us live when we mind our business? What makes this guy so special when us incels put in the effort and still get nothing?
 
No, fuck that. Why can't the people who chide us for our looks let us live when we mind our business? What makes this guy so special when us incels put in the effort and still get nothing?
Why do us able bodies incels have to resort to paying out the ass while this guy gets a chance? What makes him so special?
 
Fucking staged as fuck
 

Similar threads

asdvek
Replies
17
Views
125
User28823
User28823
psltristan1
Replies
33
Views
215
psltristan1
psltristan1
Th3Man
Replies
7
Views
64
lowiqmanlet
lowiqmanlet
turkcelfatcel
Replies
33
Views
188
zygo21113
Z

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top