hardmaxxing implants or surgery or fillers

21bidelt

21bidelt

your mother's boyfriend
Joined
Mar 23, 2026
Posts
42
Reputation
19
tagging frends:

@nobodylovesme @Master
 
  • JFL
Reactions: nobodylovesme
I might say surgery>filler>implant
 
  • +1
Reactions: 21bidelt
always filler first, so you see how you will look like, then surgery, at last implant (I saw lot of people getting implant to look uncanny)
 
always filler first, so you see how you will look like, then surgery, at last implant (I saw lot of people getting implant to look uncanny)
Filler so the surgeon is blind during surgery :Comfy: good idea
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint.
What are you looking to address? All of these procedures yield different results depending on the area of your face
 
In your case you would of course need all three but I'm afraid even thats not enough
 
implants and surgery by giant
 
always filler first, so you see how you will look like, then surgery, at last implant (I saw lot of people getting implant to look uncanny)
Fillers doesnt replicate implants at a skeletal level. These two are not the same at all.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint.
Filler so the surgeon is blind during surgery :Comfy: good idea
You're missing the point. Obviously, you dissolve with hyaluronidase months before the actual blade hits the skin. The filler is purely a 3D mockup to test the aesthetic change and soft tissue response.
Most of you guys get custom implants and end up looking like uncanny valley 'alien-phenos' because you didn't test the projection first. Using filler as a temporary diagnostic saves you from a $20k mistake. Only a low-IQ greycel would go into the OR with active filler still in the tissue
 
  • +1
Reactions: justjutting and vermicel
Fillers doesnt replicate implants at a skeletal level. These two are not the same at all.
No one said they’re bio-identical, but they mimic volumetric projection. Obviously, filler doesn't have the structural rigidity of PEEK or Medpor, but it allows you to visualize how much mm of forward growth your soft tissue can actually accommodate before you look 'uncanny.'
Getting custom implants without a volumetric mockup is how you end up with midface bloat or nerve compression because you over-estimated your tissue's limit. It’s a pre-op test for projection, not a skeletal replacement. Imagine dropping $15k on a custom wrap-around without even testing the aesthetic change on your specific pheno first
 
  • +1
Reactions: vermicel
Filler so the surgeon is blind during surgery :Comfy: good idea
and btw You just tell the guy, "I'm obviously going to dissolve it before the CT scan/surgery so the measurements are perfect
 
and btw You just tell the guy, "I'm obviously going to dissolve it before the CT scan/surgery so the measurements are perfect
Ita so eazy to desolve :forcedsmile:
 
Ita so eazy to desolve :forcedsmile:
Obviously, I’m not saying hyaluronidase is a spa treatment. We all know the risks of it eating natural tissue/collagen if the injector is a butcher.
But I’d rather deal with some temporary soft-tissue deflation that can be managed than get a permanent custom implant screwed into my skull that makes me look like a sub-human alien because I didn't test the projection first. One is a skin issue, the other is a $20k skeletal disaster. :LOL:
 
  • +1
Reactions: vermicel
look at scans showing filler all over the face, 10/20 years later. Hyaluronidase doesn't work well


I'd never use filler if i'm planning to go for implants.
 

Similar threads

5
Replies
15
Views
126
5moreyears
5
chazpw
Replies
3
Views
148
htncarriedbyeyes
htncarriedbyeyes
5
Replies
17
Views
275
5moreyears
5
Acquiescence
Replies
42
Views
837
snowslayer
snowslayer

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top