You’re enforcing the current values of society on looksmax. You’re not a revolutionary if you’re literally defending societal values
Hebbe is the worst imo. Harold is funny because he tries to be somewhat smart, but hebbe is low iq af
It is in the context of this forum
Right, but the fact this forum rejects societal values makes this place “counter culture”, you’ve come into this place to then enforce societal values. You’re therefore not a Revolutionary, but a defender of the hyper capitalist system.
I don't care about society. I am enforcing my own values, you are being too meta
Those aren’t your own values, to create your own values you’d have to be escaping slave morality - which you cannot
how are they your own values? They are values adopted by society which you claim to have adopted as your own. The truth is, you are still defending societal values, thus making you no longer a rebel
because I agree with them independently of society. if tomorrow I wake up and society thinks differently i won't
regardless if you think of them independently, in practical terms you are still a defender of societal values. Most NPC/normies would say the exact same thing as you, you are by all means a defender of societal values who has assigned themselves a moral high-ground in order to justify their disruptive behaviour
it says a lot that the only way you can criticise my views is by grouping me with others...
insulting me won't save you this time, I've simply compared your behaviour to others. Like all humans you desire to be rebellious yet are unable to safely, so society has given you a way. You can play revolutionary by defending the values of society (oh wait I mean your "own values" haha) against the "big bad" alt-right.
that wasn't an insult, retard
I don't believe in an objective morality, it's all subjective - I'd go further and say morality isn't even real. You obviously still cling onto the idea of morality being a thing, hence my "fairytale" is quite the opposite.
no shit, objective morality is a ludicrous concept
I didn't cling to any morality, I only told you to stop pushing your moral values onto others. Also because something is "bad" does not mean there is morality attached, morality is attached to "evil". I did not claim anyone was evil.
collectivism is strong
no collectivism is not strong, the individual has no strength, so he seeks it in numbers.
exactly, man on his own is weak. collectivism mogs
collectivism is needed by the weak man, collectivism only encourages weakness
yes the weak men take over and then establish their slave morality onto society, which then people like you pick up
except we are stronger than the strong men.
No you simply outnumber the strong men, you aren't stronger individuals.
that seems like a a pretty arbitrary criterion.
they lost due to be out numbered, again a collective being strong does not mean each individual is strong.
why are you only assessing individuals for strength? you need to look at the whole picture. the collectivist group is the stronger more powerful one. the "strong" men are whiny losers lol
because the individual matters more. If you want to improve yourself and become better, then look towards the morality of the masters. Slave morality only helps society
I become better by helping society, then society helps me back
How does society help you back? Society only cares about maintaining the stability of society
do you know what taxes are? public and merit goods? the role of the government in jurisprudence and intervention in capital markets?
when did I advocate for the disbanding of society? I simply stated that society celebrates weakness since we still abide by judeo-christian morality. For example "forgiveness" is just another excuse for someone who cannot take revenge, because they lack the power to fight, they cope and say they are forgiving - turning their weakness into a moral highground.
you said society "only cares about stabilising society"
Where have I argued for this? We existed as a society just fine before slave morality, it's only you not understanding my argument resorting to these old silly tactics of straw manning
Yes because society only cares for stabilising society jfl, why would society care for the individual?
and after "slave moraliy" (mogger collectivism as I would call it) we existed even better as a society. it coincides with hockey stick growth for basically every positive economic variable
