Head narrowing surgery: how is 1 cm reduction per side possible?

[thecel]

1 cm reduction per side = 2 cm reduction in head width. That’s an utterly insane difference.

Cephalic Index Chart:

Dolichocephalic	0.7 – 0.75
Mesocephalic	0.75 – 0.8
Brachycephalic	0.8 – 0.85

1 cm reduction per side will make a guy go from brachycephalic directly to dolicho.

If someone’s skull is 16.5 cm wide and 20 cm long, their cephalic index is 0.825, right in the middle of the brachy range. If they get that Eppley surgery and narrow down the side of their head by 1 cm on each side, they’d end up with a 14.5 cm wide skull and a cephalic index of 0.725, a mid-dolicho index.

If that ain’t mind-blowing enough, the average thickness of men’s temporal bones is only about 4 mm. The temporalis muscles, located on the sides of the head, are 6 mm thick on average for men.

1 cm reduction per side would leave a man with literally no skull on the sides of his head.

With all that being said, the surgeons obviously know way more about this than I do, so surely their claims are at the very least somewhat accurate. So here’s my question to the surgery experts: how is a 1 cm per side reduction in head width achieved?

 

[Mongrelcel]

Yeah bro, the 1 cm on skull is really destroying your looks.
Its definitely worth it to destroy the structural stability of your skull to reduce it.

 

[Mongrelcel]

Fuck, I've been thinking about what you said and you might be onto something
Every male model has a very rectangular face, and even models that have insane cheekbones have defined and projected cheekbones, but not somehow extremly wide.

I have this exact skull type

(from your other thread)
And when I use faceapp male filter (which makes me look so much better), a large part of what it does is, it just fucking reduces my cheekbone width, so my face is more rectangular than diamond

Even cheekbone moggers such as

Dont have cheekbones as wide as the guy above. Thair temples are more or less in line with their zygos width.

@thecel thoughts?

 

[thecel]

Fuck, I've been thinking about what you said and you might be onto something
Every male model has a very rectangular face, and even models that have insane cheekbones have defined and projected cheekbones, but not somehow extremly wide.

I have this exact skull type
View attachment 1048386(from your other thread)
And when I use faceapp male filter (which makes me look so much better), a large part of what it does is, it just fucking reduces my cheekbone width, so my face is more rectangular than diamond

Even cheekbone moggers such as
View attachment 1048388View attachment 1048389View attachment 1048392
Dont have cheekbones as wide as the guy above. Thair temples are more or less in line with their zygos width.

@thecel thoughts?

Yeah, temples more or less in line with zygo breadth is ideal

 

[joseph]

1 cm reduction per side = 2 cm reduction in head width. That’s an utterly insane difference.

Cephalic Index Chart:

Dolichocephalic	0.7 – 0.75
Mesocephalic	0.75 – 0.8
Brachycephalic	0.8 – 0.85

1 cm reduction per side will make a guy go from brachycephalic directly to dolicho.

If someone’s skull is 16.5 cm wide and 20 cm long, their cephalic index is 0.825, right in the middle of the brachy range. If they get that Eppley surgery and narrow down the side of their head by 1 cm on each side, they’d end up with a 14.5 cm wide skull and a cephalic index of 0.725, a mid-dolicho index.

If that ain’t mind-blowing enough, the average thickness of men’s temporal bones is only about 4 mm. The temporalis muscles, located on the sides of the head, are 6 mm thick on average for men.

1 cm reduction per side would leave a man with literally no skull on the sides of his head.

With all that being said, the surgeons obviously know way more about this than I do, so surely their claims are at the very least somewhat accurate. So here’s my question to the surgery experts: how is a 1 cm per side reduction in head width achieved?

@RealSurgerymax
Is 1 cm per side achievable with temporal removal?

 

[Deleted member 756]

Cope thread

 

[Selfahate]

Fuck, I've been thinking about what you said and you might be onto something
Every male model has a very rectangular face, and even models that have insane cheekbones have defined and projected cheekbones, but not somehow extremly wide.

I have this exact skull type
View attachment 1048386(from your other thread)
And when I use faceapp male filter (which makes me look so much better), a large part of what it does is, it just fucking reduces my cheekbone width, so my face is more rectangular than diamond

Even cheekbone moggers such as
View attachment 1048388View attachment 1048389View attachment 1048392
Dont have cheekbones as wide as the guy above. Thair temples are more or less in line with their zygos width.

@thecel thoughts?

Mid tier normie at best

 

[thecel]

Cope thread

Why?

 

[Deleted member 756]

Why?

It’s about phenotype not head width

 

[mogstar]

Doli skull is the most subhuman skull shape

 

[thecel]

Doli skull is the most subhuman skull shape

Alarming levels of cope.

Dolicho = forward growth

Brachy = flatcel

 

[mogstar]

Alarming levels of cope.

Dolicho = forward growth

Brachy = flatcel

You think dolicho is a good skull shape ?

 

[thecel]

It’s about phenotype not head width

Yeah but head width is still something you can change to look better (if possible)

 

[Deleted member 756]

Yeah but head width is still something you can change to look better (if possible)

Wide skull is dom

 

[thecel]

You think dolicho is a good skull shape ?

The ideal skull is of a dolichocephalic cephalic index and the absolute width of an average-sized mesocephalic skull. In other words, average width and above-average front-to-back length.

 

[thecel]

Wide skull is dom

Only if the rest of your face is dom too

 

[Deleted member 756]

Only if the rest of your face is dom

 

[Deleted member 9670]

The ideal skull is dolicho with meso width (which also means it's a large skull).

Based

 

[Deleted member 8576]

this is not important

 

[Deleted member 13076]

Found a new pic of OP

 

[mogstar]

The ideal skull is dolicho with meso width (which also means it's a large skull).

Idk what my skull shape is

 

[Deleted member 756]

Idk what my skull shape is

Bracy

 

[Deleted member 9670]

Idk what my skull shape is

You don't look that wide tbh

 

[thecel]

this is not important

Jfl you're sounding like a normie

 

[mogstar]

Bracy

I don’t think it’s bracy, maybe @thecel could let me know

 

[thecel]

I don’t think it’s bracy, maybe @thecel could let me know

Pics

 

[Beetlejuice]

skull pill

 

[mogstar]

Pics

Pmed

 

[RealSurgerymax]

@RealSurgerymax
Is 1 cm per side achievable with temporal removal?

UP TO*

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Thats insane, i read about it and it says they just cut out a big part of your temporalis muscle. How would you chew after that i wonder

 

[Mongrelcel]

Mid tier normie at best

what?

 

[joseph]

Thats insane, i read about it and it says they just cut out a big part of your temporalis muscle. How would you chew after that i wonder

it doesn't affect chewing at all, in fact you can chew the day after the procedure

 

[AlwaysHaveQuestions]

Thats insane, i read about it and it says they just cut out a big part of your temporalis muscle. How would you chew after that i wonder

i think botox is better