Hear me out , let me know if I am coping

[schizowillascend]

Rating photos - they are completely subject to lighting and expression etc

so I know how to calculate harmony and ‘objective’ beauty score

and what I notice (for myself anyway) I get rated LOWER in the photos where I am objectively higher , and it is just because I am lifting my hair and staring at the camera like an autist

Then if I posted myself in a good lighting , neutral/welcoming face even if it’s objectively worse - I get rated higher

The maths score gets me at like low/mid chadlite (you can usually be expected to be rated lower then your maths slightly) but I’m just wondering if that’s what I WOULD be in motion - since every rating photo I put has different answers

 

[schizowillascend]

It would be cool if someone reads this

 

[iqpillisreal]

depends on you I look better when the camera is above because my chin is fucking recessed

 

[ropemax]

wanna get a true rating? go outside. if people stare at you you're above average. And being above average is where the scale starts.

 

[flatcheck213]

Rating photos - they are completely subject to lighting and expression etc

so I know how to calculate harmony and ‘objective’ beauty score

and what I notice (for myself anyway) I get rated LOWER in the photos where I am objectively higher , and it is just because I am lifting my hair and staring at the camera like an autist

Then if I posted myself in a good lighting , neutral/welcoming face even if it’s objectively worse - I get rated higher

The maths score gets me at like low/mid chadlite (you can usually be expected to be rated lower then your maths slightly) but I’m just wondering if that’s what I WOULD be in motion - since every rating photo I put has different answers

ratios aren't everything and unfortunately you are measuring them wrong

 

[Jaynoyn523]

Rating photos - they are completely subject to lighting and expression etc

so I know how to calculate harmony and ‘objective’ beauty score

and what I notice (for myself anyway) I get rated LOWER in the photos where I am objectively higher , and it is just because I am lifting my hair and staring at the camera like an autist

Then if I posted myself in a good lighting , neutral/welcoming face even if it’s objectively worse - I get rated higher

The maths score gets me at like low/mid chadlite (you can usually be expected to be rated lower then your maths slightly) but I’m just wondering if that’s what I WOULD be in motion - since every rating photo I put has different answers

the real way to know if you’re good looking is how people treat you, it’s as simple as that

 

[slayy]

don't listen to indian schizos on this forum

 

[pfl]

because the math is meaningless

 

[schizowillascend]

ratios aren't everything and unfortunately you are measuring them wrong

i am not bro

 

[schizowillascend]

because the math is meaningless

interesting coming from you?

 

[acm]

depends on you I look better when the camera is above because my chin is fucking recessed

above cam angle makes it worse everyone can see ur chinlet from there

 

[pfl]

interesting coming from you?

harmony is obviously important, i mean the way u are measuring dimorphism is shit
ratios are a small portion of dimorphism
angularity is most of it

 

[schizowillascend]

harmony is obviously important, i mean the way u are measuring dimorphism is shit
ratios are a small portion of dimorphism
angularity is most of it

i am not measuring dimorphism, i am just doing a visual guess

i put myself at 5 dimorphism
5.5 angularity
6.5 misc

 

[pfl]

i am not measuring dimorphism, i am just doing a visual guess

i put myself at 5 dimorphism
5.5 angularity
6.5 misc

then we are underrating u

 

[schizowillascend]

then we are underrating u

it is SO dependant on photos - i took zetas maths - it was a bad photo of him but his maths score will be the same - he comes out to be high chadlite, but in this one photo i think he was low chadlite despite his maths being there

it is just because misc is hard to accountfor - you would agree he is low lite there?

 

[pfl]

it is SO dependant on photos - i took zetas maths - it was a bad photo of him but his maths score will be the same - he comes out to be high chadlite, but in this one photo i think he was low chadlite despite his maths being there

View attachment 3847338 it is just because misc is hard to accountfor - you would agree he is low lite there?

looks high cl to me
whats his harmony

 

[schizowillascend]

looks high cl to me
whats his harmony

64 front
91 side (i just had to guess gonial as ideal because of a couple videos it was)

so 74 - i mean maybe i was harsh on his front because i put his eye aspect as tier 3 and stuff

 

[pfl]

64 front
91 side (i just had to guess gonial as ideal because of a couple videos it was)

so 74 - i mean maybe i was harsh on his front because i put his eye aspect as tier 3 and stuff

yeah his front is not that low

 

[schizowillascend]

yeah his front is not that low

tier 2 facial thirds (upper third is off by 0.5%)
tier 3 FWHR
tier 2 cheekbone setting
tier 3 TFWHR
tier 4 chin to philtrum
tier 3 neck width
tier 3 mouth to nose ratio
tier 3 eye spacing ratio
tier 3 eye aspect ratio (he is squinting so you could probably put it as ideal)
tier 3 IAA deviation
tier 2 eyebrow tilt
tier 3 lower third proportion
tier 3 ipsilateral alar angle

 

[pfl]

tier 2 facial thirds (upper third is off by 0.5%)
tier 3 FWHR
tier 2 cheekbone setting
tier 3 TFWHR
tier 4 chin to philtrum
tier 3 neck width
tier 3 mouth to nose ratio
tier 3 eye spacing ratio
tier 3 eye aspect ratio (he is squinting so you could probably put it as ideal)
tier 3 IAA deviation
tier 2 eyebrow tilt
tier 3 lower third proportion
tier 3 ipsilateral alar angle

his cheekbones visibly look highset
eye aspect looks ideal
also how tf is his esr unideal

 

[schizowillascend]

his cheekbones visibly look highset
eye aspect looks ideal
also how tf is his esr unideal

i didnt say his ESR was unideal, his eye spacing is like 0.86
and how is his eye aspect ideal its almost 4
cheekbones are projected - not high set

 

[EthiopianMaxxer]

not coping imo

 

[schizowillascend]

his cheekbones visibly look highset
eye aspect looks ideal
also how tf is his esr unideal

imo this makes it pretty clear