Height comparison 1.93 next to 1.75 is 5'11 short ?

[william2605]

Why does everyone exaggerate the difference between 180+ up to around 193? Literally, the difference is noticeable but not huge.

Chico next a Manlet,well imagine being 180+
why incels cope about ?
MUH 5'11 Is short

 

[william2605]

Bump

 

[william2605]

Bump

 

[VelvelStein]

Why does everyone exaggerate the difference between 180+ up to around 193? Literally, the difference is noticeable but not huge.

View attachment 4428780
Chico next a Manlet,well imagine being 180+
why incels cope about ?
MUH 5'11 Is short

Example of anglefraud, pic taken from somewhat neutral position and angle(ANGLE) difference seen as low because it was taken from around 180cm and from far away. Now if we take the pic on a low lens much much closer(at is usually in irl) difference would be insane. 5'10 having eye to eye convo with 6'3 literally means that 5'10 will have to rotate his head up and still will be looking at his chin. So anything more than 3-4 inches suggest humongous difference in height, meaning that in any of interactions it's difference between eye level and "looking up" level

 

[william2605]

Example of anglefraud, pic taken from somewhat neutral position and angle(ANGLE) difference seen as low because it was taken from around 180cm and from far away. Now if we take the pic on a low lens much much closer(at is usually in irl) difference would be insane. 5'10 having eye to eye convo with 6'3 literally means that 5'10 will have to rotate his head up and still will be looking at his chin. So anything more than 3-4 inches suggest humongous difference in height, meaning that in any of interactions it's difference between eye level and "looking up" level

You saing that’s 1.80 cm is a lot shorter than 190 cm?

 

[VelvelStein]

You saing that’s 1.80 cm is a lot shorter than 190 cm?

Not " a lot a lot" type of thing but it's definitely noticeable and most of cases its not even eye to eye level
181-191(+-1 I guess) with camera closer to ppl and lower neutral point, and height difference here is LOWER than it is in your example photo, so basically proof of anglefraud, xd