Height doesn’t work linearly you idiots

Deleted member 15827

Deleted member 15827

Will be back
Joined
Oct 24, 2021
Posts
19,751
Reputation
24,322
There exists a Goldilocks zone for height. Actual research has been done on it and 6’1 to 6’3 has been found to be ideal. Usually Goldilocks zone is non contingent on flux in variables so it’s not like ideal height has suddenly become 6’6 now.

Idiots posting thread after thread on ideal height being 6’5 or 6’7 yet a single google search would have disproved your stupid theories you got from tiktok
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Karstossos and Deleted member 18244
Ideal height is not 6’5” or whatever simply cuz of how hard it is to have a proportional frame at that point, nothing else.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Karstossos and Deleted member 15827
honestly as long as your height begins with 6 you’re good to go in most settings
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bvnny. and Deleted member 15827
It’s Friday night
 
Ideal height is not 6’5” or whatever simply cuz of how hard it is to have a proportional frame at that point, nothing else.
@volcelfatcel is right 5’10 is enough in most cases and is actually ideal for proportions but u have height halo at 6’2 that’s it. At 5’10 it’s already all about face
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17723
6’1 is legit manlet tier, not joking
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15827
its all cope i know manlets that slay
 
@volcelfatcel is right 5’10 is enough in most cases and is actually ideal for proportions but u have height halo at 6’2 that’s it. At 5’10 it’s already all about face
i think closer to 6' is ideal for proportions tbh

i think face only starts at closer to 5'11.5 as well
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: subhuman to mtn and Deleted member 15827
i think closer to 6' is ideal for proportions tbh

i think face only starts at closer to 5'11.5 as well
Actually bro face starts at 5'10.5 not 5'11.5 cause I'm 5'10 and need to cope I'm not 6
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15827
why would 6ft5 not be ideal?

only reason i can think of is that daughters would be tall freak femcels]

any other reasons why its not ideal?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15827
7’2 is ideal like the guy with that asian gook
 
why would 6ft5 not be ideal?

only reason i can think of is that daughters would be tall freak femcels]

any other reasons why its not ideal?
Lots of reasons

Bad proportions
Shorter lifetime
Needs increased calorie intake for survival
Higher chance of mutations
Lesser dexterity
Higher centre of gravity
Faster rate of aging
 
under 5' is ideal, bhai :ogre:🤙

Anything above that is lanklet truecel tier 😹😹😹
 
  • +1
Reactions: güss and Deleted member 15827

Similar threads

user228947529
Replies
10
Views
318
user228947529
user228947529
hopelessromanticc
Replies
29
Views
296
aztecas
aztecas
teddy101
Replies
50
Views
454
teddy101
teddy101
nicheroider
Replies
35
Views
2K
IbalmeHponeMin
IbalmeHponeMin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top