Height is still the biggest cope in 2026, Face mogs it 4-20x harder (New 2025 study + link)

jaylook

jaylook

Iron
Joined
Jan 31, 2026
Posts
9
Reputation
12
Every single thread about height on here is the same fucking shit: "under 6'0 = automatic death sentence," "tall guys get all the 8s and 9s while manlets get leftovers". Bunch of fucking dorks in the comments talking about roping and how brutal it is, you are just not trying hard enough.

Anyway, this brand new 2025 conjoint study just buried that narrative. Researchers ran 5,340 actual swipe decisions from 445 real daters. They tested looks (the photo), height, job, bio, IQ, everything at once.

Result?+1 SD better physical attractiveness (face + body in the pic) = ~20% higher chance of getting swiped right. Height? Barely +5% at best. Everything else (job, bio, intelligence) was 7-20 times weaker than the photo.


Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579

This is not some old OKC data or forum larp. This is people actually choosing profiles on apps like Tinder/Bumble right now. Face, eye, skin, hair, lean frame, and etc destroy height once she sets eyes on you.

“Yeah but taller guys still pull hotter girls," yeah some older studies show a small correlation, sure. However, if you look at the Chapman data on 60k+ people: median lifetime sex partners are basically the same across heights. Manlets sit at -5, everyone else (short through very tall) sits at -7. The difference is fairly tiny after you clear the bare minimum. Good looking dudes pull hot girls. A 5"9 guy with a good face, good style and frame is out dating instagram 8's while being 6"3 ltn fucking dork loser with no personality and cant make a bitch laugh at fucking all gets a ltb. We all see it in real life, if you're a fucking dork and can't set any social presence, no one will respect you, including the girls.

Height helps on the first glance for the first 0.3 seconds on apps. After that, actual attractiveness takes over. In social settings, clubs, daygame height of course helps but as I said if you dont take control and sit there like a quiet fucking dork, no one will care, YOU HAVE TO SET A SOCIAL PRESECENCE, FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.

And the part that no one wants to admit is that height is mostly fixed after 18. Face is one of the malleable thing you have. Most of you corny height doomers just dont want to do anything about your life because of your fucking height.

Stop crying about missing 3 inches and actually start trying on things that can move the needle.

Data does not care about your feelings you fuckers. Face is the most important, height is a nice bonus at best.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: 3pider, primal_shitmuncher, SpectrumAesthetics3 and 5 others
dnr
 
  • +1
Reactions: ER1887 and emergence
Every single thread about height on here is the same fucking shit: "under 6'0 = automatic death sentence," "tall guys get all the 8s and 9s while manlets get leftovers". Bunch of fucking dorks in the comments talking about roping and how brutal it is, you are just not trying hard enough.

Anyway, this brand new 2025 conjoint study just buried that narrative. Researchers ran 5,340 actual swipe decisions from 445 real daters. They tested looks (the photo), height, job, bio, IQ, everything at once.

Result?+1 SD better physical attractiveness (face + body in the pic) = ~20% higher chance of getting swiped right. Height? Barely +5% at best. Everything else (job, bio, intelligence) was 7-20 times weaker than the photo.


Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579

This is not some old OKC data or forum larp. This is people actually choosing profiles on apps like Tinder/Bumble right now. Face, eye, skin, hair, lean frame, and etc destroy height once she sets eyes on you.

“Yeah but taller guys still pull hotter girls," yeah some older studies show a small correlation, sure. However, if you look at the Chapman data on 60k+ people: median lifetime sex partners are basically the same across heights. Manlets sit at -5, everyone else (short through very tall) sits at -7. The difference is fairly tiny after you clear the bare minimum. Good looking dudes pull hot girls. A 5"9 guy with a good face, good style and frame is out dating instagram 8's while being 6"3 ltn fucking dork loser with no personality and cant make a bitch laugh at fucking all gets a ltb. We all see it in real life, if you're a fucking dork and can't set any social presence, no one will respect you, including the girls.

Height helps on the first glance for the first 0.3 seconds on apps. After that, actual attractiveness takes over. In social settings, clubs, daygame height of course helps but as I said if you dont take control and sit there like a quiet fucking dork, no one will care, YOU HAVE TO SET A SOCIAL PRESECENCE, FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.

And the part that no one wants to admit is that height is mostly fixed after 18. Face is one of the malleable thing you have. Most of you corny height doomers just dont want to do anything about your life because of your fucking height.

Stop crying about missing 3 inches and actually start trying on things that can move the needle.

Data does not care about your feelings you fuckers. Face is the most important, height is a nice bonus at best.
yayayayay so i can still live as 5'4 in netherlands:love:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: lonelynigga, rhys64247, ER1887 and 2 others
If height>face why didn't FaceIQ call himself HeightIQ instead amirite??? :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bilalbrown, Jabel, rhys64247 and 1 other person
I can feel your manlet rage while I read this copium
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bilalbrown, FoidFumbler, Deleted member 260053 and 3 others
another retard
 
Every single thread about height on here is the same fucking shit: "under 6'0 = automatic death sentence," "tall guys get all the 8s and 9s while manlets get leftovers". Bunch of fucking dorks in the comments talking about roping and how brutal it is, you are just not trying hard enough.

Anyway, this brand new 2025 conjoint study just buried that narrative. Researchers ran 5,340 actual swipe decisions from 445 real daters. They tested looks (the photo), height, job, bio, IQ, everything at once.

Result?+1 SD better physical attractiveness (face + body in the pic) = ~20% higher chance of getting swiped right. Height? Barely +5% at best. Everything else (job, bio, intelligence) was 7-20 times weaker than the photo.


Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579

This is not some old OKC data or forum larp. This is people actually choosing profiles on apps like Tinder/Bumble right now. Face, eye, skin, hair, lean frame, and etc destroy height once she sets eyes on you.

“Yeah but taller guys still pull hotter girls," yeah some older studies show a small correlation, sure. However, if you look at the Chapman data on 60k+ people: median lifetime sex partners are basically the same across heights. Manlets sit at -5, everyone else (short through very tall) sits at -7. The difference is fairly tiny after you clear the bare minimum. Good looking dudes pull hot girls. A 5"9 guy with a good face, good style and frame is out dating instagram 8's while being 6"3 ltn fucking dork loser with no personality and cant make a bitch laugh at fucking all gets a ltb. We all see it in real life, if you're a fucking dork and can't set any social presence, no one will respect you, including the girls.

Height helps on the first glance for the first 0.3 seconds on apps. After that, actual attractiveness takes over. In social settings, clubs, daygame height of course helps but as I said if you dont take control and sit there like a quiet fucking dork, no one will care, YOU HAVE TO SET A SOCIAL PRESECENCE, FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.

And the part that no one wants to admit is that height is mostly fixed after 18. Face is one of the malleable thing you have. Most of you corny height doomers just dont want to do anything about your life because of your fucking height.

Stop crying about missing 3 inches and actually start trying on things that can move the needle.

Data does not care about your feelings you fuckers. Face is the most important, height is a nice bonus at best.
Harder the mog harder the cope
 
DNR COPE
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: SpectrumAesthetics3
Women cannot tell height irl btw, they think 5'10 is 6' lol
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: bilalbrown, SpectrumAesthetics3 and Souleth
Every single thread about height on here is the same fucking shit: "under 6'0 = automatic death sentence," "tall guys get all the 8s and 9s while manlets get leftovers". Bunch of fucking dorks in the comments talking about roping and how brutal it is, you are just not trying hard enough.

Anyway, this brand new 2025 conjoint study just buried that narrative. Researchers ran 5,340 actual swipe decisions from 445 real daters. They tested looks (the photo), height, job, bio, IQ, everything at once.

Result?+1 SD better physical attractiveness (face + body in the pic) = ~20% higher chance of getting swiped right. Height? Barely +5% at best. Everything else (job, bio, intelligence) was 7-20 times weaker than the photo.


Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579

This is not some old OKC data or forum larp. This is people actually choosing profiles on apps like Tinder/Bumble right now. Face, eye, skin, hair, lean frame, and etc destroy height once she sets eyes on you.

“Yeah but taller guys still pull hotter girls," yeah some older studies show a small correlation, sure. However, if you look at the Chapman data on 60k+ people: median lifetime sex partners are basically the same across heights. Manlets sit at -5, everyone else (short through very tall) sits at -7. The difference is fairly tiny after you clear the bare minimum. Good looking dudes pull hot girls. A 5"9 guy with a good face, good style and frame is out dating instagram 8's while being 6"3 ltn fucking dork loser with no personality and cant make a bitch laugh at fucking all gets a ltb. We all see it in real life, if you're a fucking dork and can't set any social presence, no one will respect you, including the girls.

Height helps on the first glance for the first 0.3 seconds on apps. After that, actual attractiveness takes over. In social settings, clubs, daygame height of course helps but as I said if you dont take control and sit there like a quiet fucking dork, no one will care, YOU HAVE TO SET A SOCIAL PRESECENCE, FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.

And the part that no one wants to admit is that height is mostly fixed after 18. Face is one of the malleable thing you have. Most of you corny height doomers just dont want to do anything about your life because of your fucking height.

Stop crying about missing 3 inches and actually start trying on things that can move the needle.

Data does not care about your feelings you fuckers. Face is the most important, height is a nice bonus at best.
Yeah it’s so retarded there’s plenty of invisible tall normie guys
Then you have a chadlite friend or 2 that’s 5ft7 or something and you really learn the truth on what matters
this is a FACE FIRST world
 
  • +1
Reactions: Final Fantasy
1775253449246

Let’s cry for this apparently 5ft8 incel haha

People are absurdly retarded and disconnected from IRL
 
  • +1
Reactions: 3pider
wouldn't get any girls compared to a ltn 6'6

cope
@jaylook 🤣
Some people just don’t know short hot guys and tall not hot guys ig
 
  • +1
Reactions: lonelynigga
another retard
yoo I got a question bro, let’s say a guy has hltn face but is like 6’7 and white, also wears accessories like fashion watch on left wrist and a bracelet on right wrist and a chain, with decent style simple like jeans and t shirts, polos, etc. what should his SMV be /10 to girls?
 
yoo I got a question bro, let’s say a guy has hltn face but is like 6’7 and white, also wears accessories like fashion watch on left wrist and a bracelet on right wrist and a chain, with decent style simple like jeans and t shirts, polos, etc. what should his SMV be /10 to girls?
I dont know
 
FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.
:lul::lul::bluepill::bluepill:
 
This is obvious to anyone who has used dating apps my matches tripled the moment i got an aesthetic physique and irl when i had 3 inch height boosters i got less IOI's than when i got big and shredded unless your in death tier height like 5ft5 and below it has less impact than face and body im 5ft9 btw
 
Last edited:
When you have to use extremes to get a point you know you've lost
you know thats me? im 5'4 in the netherlands
making me sad dude😢
that one stings
 
  • +1
Reactions: lonelynigga
Every single thread about height on here is the same fucking shit: "under 6'0 = automatic death sentence," "tall guys get all the 8s and 9s while manlets get leftovers". Bunch of fucking dorks in the comments talking about roping and how brutal it is, you are just not trying hard enough.

Anyway, this brand new 2025 conjoint study just buried that narrative. Researchers ran 5,340 actual swipe decisions from 445 real daters. They tested looks (the photo), height, job, bio, IQ, everything at once.

Result?+1 SD better physical attractiveness (face + body in the pic) = ~20% higher chance of getting swiped right. Height? Barely +5% at best. Everything else (job, bio, intelligence) was 7-20 times weaker than the photo.


Full paper here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100579

This is not some old OKC data or forum larp. This is people actually choosing profiles on apps like Tinder/Bumble right now. Face, eye, skin, hair, lean frame, and etc destroy height once she sets eyes on you.

“Yeah but taller guys still pull hotter girls," yeah some older studies show a small correlation, sure. However, if you look at the Chapman data on 60k+ people: median lifetime sex partners are basically the same across heights. Manlets sit at -5, everyone else (short through very tall) sits at -7. The difference is fairly tiny after you clear the bare minimum. Good looking dudes pull hot girls. A 5"9 guy with a good face, good style and frame is out dating instagram 8's while being 6"3 ltn fucking dork loser with no personality and cant make a bitch laugh at fucking all gets a ltb. We all see it in real life, if you're a fucking dork and can't set any social presence, no one will respect you, including the girls.

Height helps on the first glance for the first 0.3 seconds on apps. After that, actual attractiveness takes over. In social settings, clubs, daygame height of course helps but as I said if you dont take control and sit there like a quiet fucking dork, no one will care, YOU HAVE TO SET A SOCIAL PRESECENCE, FUCKING LTNS OUT HERE ARE SLAYING HMTB'S BECAUSE THEY ARE CHARISMATIC, STOP COPING THAT YOU ARE ND AND ACTUALLY FUCKING TRY TO BUILD SOME CONFIDENCE TO SAY SOMETHING, im fucking tired of it man.

And the part that no one wants to admit is that height is mostly fixed after 18. Face is one of the malleable thing you have. Most of you corny height doomers just dont want to do anything about your life because of your fucking height.

Stop crying about missing 3 inches and actually start trying on things that can move the needle.

Data does not care about your feelings you fuckers. Face is the most important, height is a nice bonus at best.
idiot theyre both important theyre completely different why compare them retard
 
idiot theyre both important theyre completely different why compare them retard
They’re not “equally important,” that’s the whole point. People here cope with height too much.
 
idk is it just me or do u notice that on average tall ppl are far more uglier than average ppl even in Hollywood always found that curios @jaylook
 

Similar threads

elsoto
Replies
2
Views
43
sziabattya
S
DoNotResusciate
Replies
6
Views
54
arlo_420
arlo_420
gaokechora
Replies
13
Views
113
gaokechora
gaokechora
iblamesociety0967
Replies
9
Views
142
acc_bolshevik
acc_bolshevik
Zorq
Replies
18
Views
141
Rigi
R

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top