Height vs body

[Deleted]

This is a pretty fair comparison of somewhat good height vs somewhat good body while neither is either a twink or manlet.

 

[the BULL]

Frame matters more

 

[Deleted member 18849]

Nah. Height even matters more than frame when predicting max strength potential.

It's more important to be tall than to have a good frame to be strong.

 

[Deleted]

Frame matters more

Frame is part of body you fucking retard

 

[the BULL]

Frame is part of body you fucking retard

Yeah, but you can't have a good body without a good frame.

 

[Indo_Chad]

For aesthetics height I guess is more valued as most male models are tall but barely any is muscular

 

[the BULL]

Nah. Height even matters more than frame when predicting max strength potential.

It's more important to be tall than to have a good frame to be strong.

nah bro those tall people you see that strenghtmog just happen to have an average to above average frame too
a tiny frame is just laughable, the true death sentence, even more than short height.

 

[Looks234]

Height>

Body is cope. Girls like twinks and dad bods

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

dad bods

even this one?

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

The body guy isn’t lean

I’m gonna stick with body mattering more but I know most of this forum will disagree

I still believe height is mostly just don’t be a Manlet theory whereas a ripped muscular physique is the biggest thing you can do for your SMV as a normie short of getting plastic surgery

 

[Deleted member 18849]

nah bro those tall people you see that strenghtmog just happen to have an average to above average frame too
a tiny frame is just laughable, the true death sentence, even more than short height.

Nah. Height increase means width and depth increase. The body is 3 dimensional.

Frame is relative to height. A 187cm guy is not only 10% taller than a 170cm guy, but also 10% wider in the x and z dimensions for equal frames or so.

 

[Deleted]

I still believe height is mostly just don’t be a Manlet theory whereas a ripped muscular physique is the biggest thing you can do for your SMV as a normie short of getting plastic surgery

Going from skinnyfat to semi muscular is going to increase smv a lot more than a nose job

 

[Deleted member 18849]

Frame is part of body you fucking retard

You yourself made this title

Height vs body​

Height is a measure of the body -> dimension.

Arvid Gaystavsson, no wonder why your fuckface is the visual synonym of stupidity

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

Going from skinnyfat to semi muscular is going to increase smv a lot more than a nose job

Bro I already have a top tier natty body

I’m getting nose job cos I ran out of things to softmax

But I do agree- not sure if you were specifically aiming that comment at me?

 

[Deleted]

Bro I already have a top tier natty body

I’m getting nose job cos I ran out of things to softmax

But I do agree- not sure if you were specifically aiming that comment at me?

Was just an example tbh i didn't remember what surgery you were getting tbf

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

Nah. Height even matters more than frame when predicting max strength potential.

It's more important to be tall than to have a good frame to be strong.

Serious question, is there a limit to that?
Is the average 7’ that much stronger the average 6’4 guy?

 

[Deleted member 18849]

Serious question, is there a limit to that?
Is the average 7’ that much stronger the average 6’4 guy?

Frames being equal, yes.


If you take a person A from the top 0.001%-ile of height range, with average everything else, which means 50%-ile frame, receptors, insertions, etc, and compare it with the person B 50%-ile of height and average everything else as well, except top 0.001%-ile frame, let them workout, reach their max potential whether enhancing with roids or not.

Person A wouldn't look as good, but would be stronger. Not by a lot. Frame is close second.

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

Frames being equal, yes.


If you take a person A from the top 0.001%-ile of height range, with average everything else, which means 50%-ile frame, receptors, insertions, etc, and compare it with the person B 50%-ile of height and average everything else as well, except top 0.001%-ile frame, let them workout, reach their max potential whether enhancing with roids or not.

Person A wouldn't look as good, but would be stronger. Not by a lot. Frame is close second.

I know the fastest sprinters are anywhere from 5’8-6’5. Figured there is a limit on strength.

Actually looked it up, the strongest men are usually around the lower 6’ range

 

[Deleted member 18849]

I know the fastest sprinters are anywhere from 5’8-6’5. Figured there is a limit on strength.

Actually looked it up, the strongest men are usually around the lower 6’ range

You mean people like Hafthor Bjorsson? He's 6'8-9. Eddie Hall is like 6'3?

But it makes sense it would not be 7ft+. It would be very hard to find insane frame, insertions, neural-muscular connection, at a height range with very few people (1) and (2) people willing to do extreme training diets and roids.

 

[Squirtoutmabooty]

You mean people like Hafthor Bjorsson? He's 6'8-9. Eddie Hall is like 6'3?

But it makes sense it would not be 7ft+. It would be very hard to find insane frame, insertions, neural-muscular connection, at a height range with very few people (1) and (2) people willing to do extreme training diets and roids.

By low 6’ range I meant anywhere from 6’-6’4. Hafthor is actually the exception and wasn’t the strongest.

 

[germanlooks]

Nah. Height increase means width and depth increase. The body is 3 dimensional.

Frame is relative to height. A 187cm guy is not only 10% taller than a 170cm guy, but also 10% wider in the x and z dimensions for equal frames or so.

The picture in Op disproves what you say about width.

The taller guy has narrower shoulders (bones)

 

[Deleted member 18849]

By low 6’ range I meant anywhere from 6’-6’4. Hafthor is actually the exception and wasn’t the strongest.

He holds the world record for the deadlift. Easily the strongest man to ever walk the planet.

 

[DoctorLooksmax]

You mean people like Hafthor Bjorsson? He's 6'8-9. Eddie Hall is like 6'3?

But it makes sense it would not be 7ft+. It would be very hard to find insane frame, insertions, neural-muscular connection, at a height range with very few people (1) and (2) people willing to do extreme training diets and roids.

Could that no just be because people 7ft + are insanely rare to begin with? Or is that that the point you’re already making

 

[Deleted member 18849]

The picture in Op disproves what you say about width.

The taller guy has narrower shoulders (bones)

I had Arvid Gaystavsson blocked. I came here from the forum front page showing the Bull's comment. I thought he made the thread and his comment was the post

 

[Deleted member 18849]

Could that no just be because people 7ft + are insanely rare to begin with? Or is that that the point you’re already making

Yep that's what I'm saying.

 

[Deleted member 21628]

Face comes into play

 

[Deleted member 21393]