High FWHR Looks Retarded

thecel

thecel

morph king
Joined
May 16, 2020
Posts
26,032
Reputation
56,007
1705208208407


His FWHR is 2.652
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bleachmaxxer69, BloodClot, AscendingHero and 14 others
Having a face that wide was never considered ideal, plus he's fat. Medium-wide faces are best.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mainstream, BitchBoy and thecel
just ignore the fact he has downsyndrome blame it in his fwhr
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: jacobrb07, xeqri, Axii and 16 others
bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: BitchBoy
2.0 is ideal
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: MakinMogReturns, thecel and BitchBoy
Have some reacts, cucks. I never saw a word
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13626, thecel and Deleted member 38235
tall face>compact face>long face
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 55437 and thecel
cope, fwhr or your not a man
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and MakinMogReturns
I mean he is retarded??
 
  • JFL
Reactions: rubberduck and Mainstream
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: bleachmaxxer69, thecel and MakinMogReturns
Literally never seen such cope before
stunted midface cope

fwhr isnt even sexually dimorphic, only a high bizygomatic width is

only reason women and men have similar fwhr is because women have highset brows

but wanna know whats more dimorphic than a high bizygomatic width?

a tall skull
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 55437, NoReedemingFeature, MakinMogReturns and 1 other person
stunted midface cope

fwhr isnt even sexually dimorphic, only a high bizygomatic width is

only reason women and men have similar fwhr is because women have highset brows

but wanna know whats more dimorphic than a high bizygomatic width?

a tall skull
this is false fwhr isnt even sexually dimorphic, only a high bizygomatic width is

this is also false
only reason women and men have similar fwhr is because women have highset brows

inb4 he copes for his 1.8 fwhr
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: horizontallytall, ElTruecel and Deleted member 50702
this is false fwhr isnt even sexually dimorphic, only a high bizygomatic width is

this is also false
only reason women and men have similar fwhr is because women have highset brows

inb4 he copes for his 1.8 fwhr
Its true tho, ideal range for fwhr is the same for women and men and its only the same because women have high set brows, disregarding brow setness women have higher fwhr
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 50702
this is false fwhr isnt even sexually dimorphic, only a high bizygomatic width is

this is also false
only reason women and men have similar fwhr is because women have highset brows

inb4 he copes for his 1.8 fwhr
Disprove it then

I can send u the studies when I get on pc

Keep coping with ur fem midface
 
  • +1
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature
Its true tho, ideal range for fwhr is the same for women and men and its only the same because women have high set brows, disregarding brow setness women have higher fwhr
ideal fwhr for attractive men and women are the same 1.9-2

wide bizygo literally correlated with fwhr so that destroys his point completely
 
ideal fwhr for attractive men and women are the same 1.9-2

wide bizygo literally correlated with fwhr so that destroys his point completely
True but wide Zygos are shit. I have wide Zygos and it fucks me over.
 
ideal fwhr for attractive men and women are the same 1.9-2

wide bizygo literally correlated with fwhr so that destroys his point completely
You might be illiterate u stupid Nigger

I literally said high bizygo is sexually dimorphic but not the ratio itself since women have short nose and short philtrum
 
Disprove it then

I can send u the studies when I get on pc

Keep coping with ur fem midface
Fem midface? hahahahahaha yeah bro my 1.95 fwhr is so fem my brother has 1.7 and LONG skull its night and day
 
True but wide Zygos are shit. I have wide Zygos and it fucks me over.
Wide zygos arnt shit it all depends on how it correlates together i love my wide zygos
 
Fem midface? hahahahahaha yeah bro my 1.95 fwhr is so fem my brother has 1.7 and LONG skull its night and day
U have a woman nose

U look good overall but ur coping hard
 
You might be illiterate u stupid Nigger

I literally said high bizygo is sexually dimorphic but not the ratio itself since women have short nose and short philtrum
You mid tier normie calm down hahaha

It’s just a flaw in the ratio itself it doesn’t make the general rule non effective its the same as wide pfl making people have cyclops esr when in reality it is just a flaw in the measurement itself
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 50702
Cope. I’ll show u on discord
It isnt cope lol niggas on here amaze me first its 1.9 fwhr and above is a falio now its wide zygos is a falio 😆
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: NoReedemingFeature and thecel
It isnt cope lol niggas on here amaze me first its 1.9 fwhr and above is a falio now its wide zygos is a falio 😆
My FWHR is like 1.8/1.9 my Zygos are wide but my jaw is narrow in comparison that’s the issue more or less.
 
My FWHR is like 1.8/1.9 my Zygos are wide but my jaw is narrow in comparison that’s the issue more or less.
Ur issue is ur jaw not zygos
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 55437, ElTruecel and MakinMogReturns
@MakinMogReturns
measure 20 women's fwhr but stop at the nasion instead of glabella and do the same with 20 men and tell me how masc high fwhr is
 
My fwhr is like 1.60 it’s really really bad
Still never failed my face as hard as it was supposed to
When you have good bones nothing can stop you tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: MakinMogReturns
1705795260434


dayum

@cantbreed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 50702
Wow this one study disproves measurements of 1000 people who are attractive i 100% agree with you now i guess 1.9-2.1 dwhr really is a huge flaw man fuck you got me normie damn
My fwhr is like 1.60 it’s really really bad
Still never failed my face as hard as it was supposed to
When you have good bones nothing can stop you tbh
dont worry bro just get a longer skull 1.6 fwhr is ideal!
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 49341
Wow this one study disproves measurements of 1000 people who are attractive i 100% agree with you now i guess 1.9-2.1 dwhr really is a huge flaw man fuck you got me normie damn

dont worry bro just get a longer skull 1.6 fwhr is ideal!
Good zygos and overall biognial width makes your face look more compact
There are always exceptions
 
Wow this one study disproves measurements of 1000 people who are attractive i 100% agree with you now i guess 1.9-2.1 dwhr really is a huge flaw man fuck you got me normie damn
Just because most attractive people have that ratio doesn't mean it's sexually dimorphic

Nigge
 
Just because most attractive people have that ratio doesn't mean it's sexually dimorphic

Nigge
😆😆😆😆 it makes more sense for it to than for it not to either way all im saying is if ur fwhr is 1.9 ur in the safe zone long skulls do look dimorphic if you dont have a narrow skull to begin with maher is perfect example of masc skull wonder what his fwhr is
 
😆😆😆😆 it makes more sense for it to than for it not to either way all im saying is if ur fwhr is 1.9 ur in the safe zone long skulls do look dimorphic if you dont have a narrow skull to begin with maher is perfect example of masc skull wonder what his fwhr is
Nigga just do what I told you and tell me how sexually dimorphic fwhr is

Can you not use ur brain? If men had higher brows, who would have the higher fwhr? Answer this question
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel

Similar threads

shehzadgillani
Replies
6
Views
211
Saint Casanova
Saint Casanova
comingthrough
Replies
27
Views
489
Clown Show
Clown Show
shehzadgillani
Replies
10
Views
182
vernier
vernier
Joaquin
Replies
86
Views
1K
Prettyboyzazaturner
Prettyboyzazaturner
J
Replies
3
Views
88
penguin76
penguin76

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top