High iq only rate my ratios what should i do?

[ShawarmaFilth]

Fwhr: 1.81



Lower/full face ratio: 0.61



Midface: 1.0



Mouth to nose: 1.2



Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.72



Chin to philtrum: 1.93



Bigonial width: 85.5%



Bizyogomatic to bigonial width: 1.2



Esr: .45



Gonial angle: 129



palpebral fissure length to heigh ratio: 2.9



Canthal tilt: 6


Is it over? Biggest falio seems to he bigonial width but idk if i should train massaters cuz i dont wanna look bloated

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

@thecel

 

[nathan]

Fwhr: 1.81



Lower/full face ratio: 0.61



Midface: 1.0



Mouth to nose: 1.2



Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.72



Chin to philtrum: 1.93



Bigonial width: 85.5%



Bizyogomatic to bigonial width: 1.2



Esr: .45



Gonial angle: 129



palpebral fissure length to heigh ratio: 2.9



Canthal tilt: 6


Is it over? Biggest falio seems to he bigonial width but idk if i should train massaters cuz i dont wanna look bloated

widen mouth
and get jaw fillers

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

widen mouth
and get jaw fillers

My mouth kinda would look bad if wider,i moprhed it.

Does that mean my nose is too wide?

 

[jjbomb]

My mouth kinda would look bad if wider,i moprhed it.

Does that mean my nose is too wide?

pic

 

[nathan]

My mouth kinda would look bad if wider,i moprhed it.

Does that mean my nose is too wide?

probably

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

probably

Let me just fucking pm u rq actually

 

[thecel]

Gonial angle: 129

never began

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

never began

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

@JoshuaAccept

 

[Deleted member 42956]

Fwhr: 1.81



Lower/full face ratio: 0.61



Midface: 1.0



Mouth to nose: 1.2



Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.72



Chin to philtrum: 1.93



Bigonial width: 85.5%



Bizyogomatic to bigonial width: 1.2



Esr: .45



Gonial angle: 129



palpebral fissure length to heigh ratio: 2.9



Canthal tilt: 6


Is it over? Biggest falio seems to he bigonial width but idk if i should train massaters cuz i dont wanna look bloated

ESR ideal, canthal tilt ideal, palepbral length to height ideal, bigonial width 85.5 near ideal, (im assuming the 1.2 was a mismeasurement since 1.2 is way worse than 85.5%) Gonial angle kinda bad, lip ratio ideal, mouth to nose really bad, midface ratio ideal, fwhr kinda bad.

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

ESR ideal, canthal tilt ideal, palepbral length to height ideal, bigonial width 85.5 near ideal, (im assuming the 1.2 was a mismeasurement since 1.2 is way worse than 85.5%) Gonial angle kinda bad, lip ratio ideal, mouth to nose really bad, midface ratio ideal, fwhr kinda bad.

I thought fwhr was just barely ideal?
Are these measurements = over or nah

 

[Deleted member 42956]

I thought fwhr was just barely ideal?
Are these measurements = over or nah

Ideal fwhr is 1.9 - 2.06. Also i dont think so seems like average ratios

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

Ideal fwhr is 1.9 - 2.06. Also i dont think so seems like average ratios

average? NOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Can u send me the chart u use for ideal ratios and how to measure/calculate them?

I used this:

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 42956]

average? NOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Can u send me the chart u use for ideal ratios and how to measure/calculate them?

I used this:

Ideal facial ratios and proportions

this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+ measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper...

looksmax.org

That list is rly bad idk why its in botb. My ideal ranges i get off creatingattractive. They might not be completely accurate but they are way better than that list.
First of all ideal nose to mouth ratio is obviously not 1.5-1.62. Thats a completely uncanny ratio also they measured o'prys mouth to nose ratio incorrectly. The actual ideal is more like 1.38-1.53. O'prys is around 1.44. Ill send u the full list of ideal ratios in dms

 

[Deleted member 45780]

That list is rly bad idk why its in botb. My ideal ranges i get off creatingattractive. They might not be completely accurate but they are way better than that list.
First of all ideal nose to mouth ratio is obviously not 1.5-1.62. Thats a completely uncanny ratio also they measured o'prys mouth to nose ratio incorrectly. The actual ideal is more like 1.38-1.53. O'prys is around 1.44. Ill send u the full list of ideal ratios in dms

Me too

 

[ShawarmaFilth]

Me too

What?

 

[Deleted member 45780]

What?

I aak him to send me ideal ratios as well

 

[Lookologist003]

This is low-IQ

 

[Deleted member 66574]

Fwhr: 1.81



Lower/full face ratio: 0.61



Midface: 1.0



Mouth to nose: 1.2



Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.72



Chin to philtrum: 1.93



Bigonial width: 85.5%



Bizyogomatic to bigonial width: 1.2



Esr: .45



Gonial angle: 129



palpebral fissure length to heigh ratio: 2.9



Canthal tilt: 6


Is it over? Biggest falio seems to he bigonial width but idk if i should train massaters cuz i dont wanna look bloated

Pic nigga we dont need thise

 

[manletmogger]

Mine mogs

 

[perpetuallytired]

.

 

[manletmogger]

Fwhr: 1.81



Lower/full face ratio: 0.61



Midface: 1.0



Mouth to nose: 1.2



Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.72



Chin to philtrum: 1.93



Bigonial width: 85.5%



Bizyogomatic to bigonial width: 1.2



Esr: .45



Gonial angle: 129



palpebral fissure length to heigh ratio: 2.9



Canthal tilt: 6


Is it over? Biggest falio seems to he bigonial width but idk if i should train massaters cuz i dont wanna look bloated

Ugly