HIGH IQ only

Saint Casanova

Saint Casanova

Fire
Joined
Apr 11, 2023
Posts
26,187
Reputation
32,167
Is there a simple way of solving this integral. I can’t find a suitable substitution to use and using parts just becomes extremely messy and ridiculous.
 

Attachments

  • 566508F4-BDFB-4BF4-B0BC-AF335F17C98F.jpeg
    566508F4-BDFB-4BF4-B0BC-AF335F17C98F.jpeg
    90.8 KB · Views: 0
is this college algevra?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Why can't you just Google it m8
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Maybe you could let u= 1+x, so u-1=x,
x^2= (u-1)^2
Du/dx= 1
dx=1/du
And then you’ll have integral of ln(u-1+(1+(u-1)^2))du which you can try solving by parts ???
 
What is this for? Uni?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova

Looks like you just have to do integration by parts, it works out fairly nicely
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
Maybe you could let u= 1+x, so u-1=x,
x^2= (u-1)^2
Du/dx= 1
dx=1/du
And then you’ll have integral of ln(u-1+(1+(u-1)^2))du which you can try solving by parts ???
So the ones cancel and you get ln(u+(u-1)^2), so using by parts you have u= ln(u+(u-1)^2 and dv/du= 1.
 

Looks like you just have to do integration by parts, it works out fairly nicely
Does the substitution i used above make it a bit easier to solve. You still have to use parts either way.
 
Does the substitution i used above make it a bit easier to solve. You still have to use parts either way.
Probably not, you don't use regular integration by parts. You do the trick where one of the parts =1
 
Probably not, you don't use regular integration by parts. You do the trick where one of the parts =1
Yeah that’s what I did. Dv/dx= 1 so v= x
U= ln(u+(u-1)^2). Differentiating I would probably be quite annoying but it still should be easier, no ?
 

Similar threads

TYLER IN NARRATOR
Replies
24
Views
84
Copercel
Copercel
DarkTriadBeliever
Replies
31
Views
138
Ultimate Subhuman™
Ultimate Subhuman™
rc201
Replies
1
Views
57
butterfly401
butterfly401
newgen/cel
Replies
52
Views
183
epicmogger123
epicmogger123
NoseProphecy
Replies
20
Views
73
Wexilarious
Wexilarious

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top