High yamnayan dna whites are bulls. and act off instinct

yeah thats true. That area of the world was so populated. But there was no doubt that these white people had a lot of mates , were super influential when they arrived, because there is 1.6 billion people in india, the north has what like 800 million people, a lot still have 10-15% european dna. That's still fucking wild.

The white people did found hinduism and basically make their own cult , otherwise even if they were JBWmaxxed in india, there is no other way to explain north indians have 10-15% european DNA. If they leave such a big trace, it means they were highly influential in the society.

10-15% DNA for what a couple hundred or thousand people, in a place of the world that had 20 million people? My point is they must have been the elites, and if not the elites, must have had some cultural significance. If they just came there and all the women wanted to fuck them, the local men would have just slaughtered them; they were the majority.

Thats my reasoning for why I beleive they founded hinduism. There is no other way.
It was never JBW, but rather just be west Eurasian, brutal
 
Nah this doesn’t make much sense, here’s my take, we know the caste system is actually a pre Aryan thing, they just assimilated to its top levels, also the Indus Valley farmers ranged from 60-80% Iran N, and 20-40% south Asian hunter gatherer, what makes most sense to me is that the Iran N maxxed farmers oppressed the high SAHG populations, and the proto indo aryans due to being cool foriegners assimilated to being the high class alongside the Zagros N heavy farmers. You know what corellates with higher caste much more than steppe ancestry? Zagros N, even Indian beauty standards are heavily biased towards lighter skinned but still Iran N looking people, not euro looking whites. There simply isnt any real evidence for aryans ruling over the rest of South Asia
If that was true then the top castes would share the most european DNA, that didnt happen. I do believe the brahmin after the europeans breaded themself to extinction in that region, claimed their successes and added their influence to the vedic culture.

I dont think they were in the higher castes, I think the men breeded themselves out in a couple generations, they never came across as some people who would "move up the social hierachy ladder", they were known for pillaging and shit jfl. I think they didnt participate in the whole caste system shit, it was foreign to them, they just wrote their books, and they were popular with the people and had a bunch of women because of it. The men subscribed to the religion so they couldnt kill them.

Its no different to the founding of Islam: a group of people makes their cult book, to justify their polygamy. I mean in islamic countries, how do you move up the social ladder? You could be a hard-working, regular guy, if you do that you will not get shit especially in a third world country, the Sheikh with 3 wives will take your bitch, and before you know it your joining ISIS because your an incel and product of polygamy. (This is the pipeline of most terrorists jfl). So what do you do instead? You become the priests, the one who teach the book, and get multiple women.

Forming a religion was an unpatched method to get a lot of partners back in the day. It worked well.

1789118613765


JFL.
 
yeah thats true. That area of the world was so populated. But there was no doubt that these white people had a lot of mates , were super influential when they arrived, because there is 1.6 billion people in india, the north has what like 800 million people, a lot still have 10-15% european dna. That's still fucking wild.

The white people did found hinduism and basically make their own cult , otherwise even if they were JBWmaxxed in india, there is no other way to explain north indians have 10-15% european DNA. If they leave such a big trace, it means they were highly influential in the society.

10-15% DNA for what a couple hundred or thousand people, in a place of the world that had 20 million people? My point is they must have been the elites, and if not the elites, must have had some cultural significance. If they just came there and all the women wanted to fuck them, the local men would have just slaughtered them; they were the majority.

Thats my reasoning for why I beleive they founded hinduism. There is no other way.
Its shows how little you about it lol . Most south asians have very little steppe ancestry its basically Irrelevant.
Only the jats and rors have high steppe ancestry in south asia .

And they are only about 30 million in total . 20 million in Pakistan and 10 million in india .

Lumping everyone together is so dumb
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
If that was true then the top castes would share the most european DNA, that didnt happen. I do believe the brahmin after the europeans breaded themself to extinction in that region, claimed their successes and added their influence to the vedic culture.

I dont think they were in the higher castes, I think the men breeded themselves out in a couple generations, they never came across as some people who would "move up the social hierachy ladder", they were known for pillaging and shit jfl. I think they didnt participate in the whole caste system shit, it was foreign to them, they just wrote their books, and they were popular with the people and had a bunch of women because of it. The men subscribed to the religion so they couldnt kill them.

Its no different to the founding of Islam: a group of people makes their cult book, to justify their polygamy. I mean in islamic countries, how do you move up the social ladder? You could be a hard-working, regular guy, if you do that you will not get shit especially in a third world country, the Sheikh with 3 wives will take your bitch, and before you know it your joining ISIS because your an incel and product of polygamy. (This is the pipeline of most terrorists jfl). So what do you do instead? You become the priests, the one who teach the book, and get multiple women.

Forming a religion was an unpatched method to get a lot of partners back in the day. It worked well.

View attachment 5632572

JFL.
Once again all of the evidence surrounding the proto indo aryans points to a peaceful gradual assimilation, they weren’t pillaging shit
 
It was never JBW, but rather just be west Eurasian, brutal
some of them had light eyes and half were blonde or had red hair, basically white jfl. if u saw them today and had to classify them yeah theyd be white.

JBW is more so just lighter eye colour , and just not having black hair. Sometimes being more pale and undertones are accounted for, but that is all JBW is, some nigga mutt in the favelas could grift his JBW.

1789118910359


I know race is real , and being white is defined by a set of genes, for instance southern italians are white and are classified in that gene. But can they JBWmax that hard? No.

Since nearly no non-white people have light eyes and lighter hair colours, we just say JBW. Even despite not every white person being able to grift JBW if it makes sense.
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
some of them had light eyes and half were blonde or had red hair, basically white jfl. if u saw them today and had to classify them yeah theyd be white.

JBW is more so just lighter eye colour , and just not having black hair. Sometimes being more pale and undertones are accounted for, but that is all JBW is, some nigga mutt in the favelas could grift his JBW.

View attachment 5632592

I know race is real , and being white is defined by a set of genes, for instance southern italians are white and are classified in that gene. But can they JBWmax that hard? No.

Since nearly no non-white people have light eyes and lighter hair colours, we just say JBW. Even despite not every white person being able to grift JBW if it makes sense.
I know they were white, I’m just saying you’re downplaying how important the Zagros N component is.
 
some of them had light eyes and half were blonde or had red hair, basically white jfl. if u saw them today and had to classify them yeah theyd be white.

JBW is more so just lighter eye colour , and just not having black hair. Sometimes being more pale and undertones are accounted for, but that is all JBW is, some nigga mutt in the favelas could grift his JBW.

View attachment 5632592

I know race is real , and being white is defined by a set of genes, for instance southern italians are white and are classified in that gene. But can they JBWmax that hard? No.

Since nearly no non-white people have light eyes and lighter hair colours, we just say JBW. Even despite not every white person being able to grift JBW if it makes sense.
Anyways I gotta sleep, was fun talking but in the end all I’m saying is that saying that white people made Hinduism is retarded when you look at the full picture, equivalent to saying white people invented rock and roll and hip hop
 
  • Love it
Reactions: FiendFiend
Corded ware is a better representation of aryan/white aggression, the corded ware selected heavily for white traits like blonde hair and carried out the majority of the IE conquests into europe, and also were the ones that absorbed yamnaya and conquered their remnants
 
Once again all of the evidence surrounding the proto indo aryans points to a peaceful gradual assimilation, they weren’t pillaging shit
I know, that's why I'm saying they founded Hinduism, it's just a theory, though. I didn't see them assimilate the caste system, it has no correlation with European DNA in India. If anything, some of the highest European groups are shit on in the caste system pretty sure.

They clearly had a lot of partners and did it without firing a shot; that's why I believe they just founded a religion that was about pacifism, meditation, and bs, and wrote some cool stories. Hypergamy wasn't too much of a real thing, and if it did exist didn't affect populations; the way most men failed to reproduce was through conquering, and the men being killed before they could reproduce and the women staying.

Do MENA Islamic countries, when they have incels as a result of hypergamy and not having a population pyramid like Africa, actually target the islamic elite who have multiple wives? No, they target random people jfl. Minorities, the rich, secular people. Religion is a perfect justification to do whatever the fuck you want. This is why I am staunchly a protestant because I believe any large religious institution will grow corrupt.
 
Anyways I gotta sleep, was fun talking but in the end all I’m saying is that saying that white people made Hinduism is retarded when you look at the full picture, equivalent to saying white people invented rock and roll and hip hop
idk the waters are murky we will just never know jfl. Im just theorizing just based on previous patterns on the way they acted. GN tho man
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
Corded ware is a better representation of aryan/white aggression, the corded ware selected heavily for white traits like blonde hair and carried out the majority of the IE conquests into europe, and also were the ones that absorbed yamnaya and conquered their remnants
90 percent of IE DNA, languages and cultural legacy derived from the corded ware, the yamnaya were just a swarthy earlier branch that had its descendants wiped out on the steppe by their lighter cousins who had selected heavily for blonde hair and blue eyes while expanding due to absorbing globular amphora, I will never understand the idealization of yamnaya when there is the objectively surperior corded ware cultures who are far more genetically closer
 
90 percent of IE DNA, languages and cultural legacy derived from the corded ware, the yamnaya were just a swarthy earlier branch that had its descendants wiped out on the steppe by their lighter cousins who had selected heavily for blonde hair and blue eyes while expanding due to absorbing globular amphora, I will never understand the idealization of yamnaya when there is the objectively surperior corded ware cultures who are far more genetically closer
True but you’re retarded for taking pride in corded ware as well, take pride in whatever your specific nation or ethnic group has done at most
 
  • +1
Reactions: FiendFiend
I tried testing to see how much yamnaya I have, apparently I have significantly more bell beaker dna than the average European in all populations while having less of other ancient populations. Isn’t that the same thing as yamnaya kind of.
 
Last edited:
90 percent of IE DNA, languages and cultural legacy derived from the corded ware, the yamnaya were just a swarthy earlier branch that had its descendants wiped out on the steppe by their lighter cousins who had selected heavily for blonde hair and blue eyes while expanding due to absorbing globular amphora, I will never understand the idealization of yamnaya when there is the objectively surperior corded ware cultures who are far more genetically closer
3/4 of corded ware DNA is Yamnaya. But yeah the corded ware yamnayans were superior, JFL. Some of the yamnaya went into fucking india founded hinduism most likely and killed off their genes. Pussy whipped niggas.

Theres no doubt they were very strong, though; I just think Europeans sometimes lack aggression, thats all, we can take inspiration from the yamnaya for that reason. The corded ware settled down, genetically selected for good traits. White people dont need to genetically select more, thats how we die out.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars
yeah like i said, its debated thats why i dont even debate it, whats fact and truth tho is yamnaya are behind blonde hair and red hair in europe.

The map of global Yamnaya DNA aligns perfectly with the lighter hair percentages, on top of north france being way more yamnaya and being more blonde, and the south of france, i've seen in real times with my eyes crossing having darker haired people.
More like blonde hair came from siberia and light skin from anatolia yamnaya ancestors (R) were high t mongoloid bulls who fucked with everyone so they inherited caucasoid skull light hair and pale skin that they spread to other places
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
True but you’re retarded for taking pride in corded ware as well, take pride in whatever your specific nation or ethnic group has done at most
im like 50% yamnaya its have my dna jfl. Also a high Yamnaya DNA person vs a low Yamnaya DNA person is still very evident; genetically nordic people have the ability to fight back, and even be the aggressors, like they used to be. The Nordic people being so docile is such a new thing and mainly because of Sweden, which was neutral for so long, and all then Nordics, as of recent history, were dominated by Sweden.

Sweden and their political ideology is super anti-white. Even their sterilization programs and obsession with muhh just more perfect genes. Genes don't matter if you're preselecting and removing the "mentally ill" out, its important we have the "mentally ill" in the gene pool. Mental illness is a natural response to your environment. Instead, if you don't like living in your little summer home in the Nordics, oh its okay; you won't reproduce now. Basically pre-selecting to make the most faggotted population on earth.
 
3/4 of corded ware DNA is Yamnaya. But yeah the corded ware yamnayans were superior, JFL. Some of the yamnaya went into fucking india founded hinduism most likely and killed off their genes. Pussy whipped niggas.

Theres no doubt they were very strong, though; I just think Europeans sometimes lack aggression, thats all, we can take inspiration from the yamnaya for that reason. The corded ware settled down, genetically selected for good traits. White people dont need to genetically select more, thats how we die out.
Yeah but thats the point, corded ware were a cousin branch that absorbed the intial yamnaya then expanded into europe, we have far more genetic continuity with corded ware than we do with the original yamnaya, even the sintasha culture which you are referring to are the direct descendants of corded ware and derive far more genetic continuity with them than yamnaya, I dislike yamnaya idealization prescisely because it allows some zagrosian caucasian mutt to try and claim them and it makes genetic debates far more simpler when you choose the CWC group that are far mroe closer genetically and far more phenotypically similar to modern europeans as opposed to yamnaya, also lack of aggression is moreso because in the medieval times we selected heavily against it due to mass excecutions of criminals and such while we became far more domesticated, obv we still have the influence but as a result most people are just going to be far more tame than the original IE due to the inherent domestication that civilization selects for
 
im like 50% yamnaya its have my dna jfl. Also a high Yamnaya DNA person vs a low Yamnaya DNA person is still very evident; genetically nordic people have the ability to fight back, and even be the aggressors, like they used to be. The Nordic people being so docile is such a new thing and mainly because of Sweden, which was neutral for so long, and all then Nordics, as of recent history, were dominated by Sweden.

Sweden and their political ideology is super anti-white. Even their sterilization programs and obsession with muhh just more perfect genes. Genes don't matter if you're preselecting and removing the "mentally ill" out, its important we have the "mentally ill" in the gene pool. Mental illness is a natural response to your environment. Instead, if you don't like living in your little summer home in the Nordics, oh its okay; you won't reproduce now. Basically pre-selecting to make the most faggotted population on earth.
I’m 50% zagrosian, does that mean I take credit for all of Iran, Iraq, the elamites, and every other society that was built by zagrosians? No.
 
True but you’re retarded for taking pride in corded ware as well, take pride in whatever your specific nation or ethnic group has done at most
Why? we derive 99 percent of our ancestral religions, languages and cultures from those people (could also argue european christianity as well due to it being influenced by european pagan cultures, see the book here but thats a debate for another time), obviously im not going to go around saying im corded ware outside of meme larping but why would you not take pride in grandparent ancestral groups that were foundational to the creation of your ethnic groups,
81XTQ0p1uQL AC UF10001000 QL80
 
Yeah but thats the point, corded ware were a cousin branch that absorbed the intial yamnaya then expanded into europe, we have far more genetic continuity with corded ware than we do with the original yamnaya, even the sintasha culture which you are referring to are the direct descendants of corded ware and derive far more genetic continuity with them than yamnaya, I dislike yamnaya idealization prescisely because it allows some zagrosian caucasian mutt to try and claim them and it makes genetic debates far more simpler when you choose the CWC group that are far mroe closer genetically and far more phenotypically similar to modern europeans as opposed to yamnaya, also lack of aggression is moreso because in the medieval times we selected heavily against it due to mass excecutions of criminals and such while we became far more domesticated, obv we still have the influence but as a result most people are just going to be far more tame than the original IE due to the inherent domestication that civilization selects for
American blacks are the true descendants of ancient IE culture brah
 
Why? we derive 99 percent of our ancestral religions, languages and cultures from those people (could also argue european christianity as well due to it being influenced by european pagan cultures, see the book here but thats a debate for another time), obviously im not going to go around saying im corded ware outside of meme larping but why would you not take pride in grandparent ancestral groups that were foundational to the creation of your ethnic groups,
View attachment 5632670
I just view the world fundementally differently I guess, I mean I understand on paper what you’re saying but it seems so stupid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars
Niggas really be arguing about what people 5000 years ago looked like. :AlienPls:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: FiendFiend
I just view the world fundementally differently I guess, I mean I understand on paper what you’re saying but it seems so stupid.
In the age of globalization it just makes more sense to unite with far more similar people (IE becoming more pan-northwestern european in this context), petty nationalism of the old is just far more detrimental as opposed to acting as a unified bloc via stuff like the EU (not the modern conception but the concept itself was a great idea) is essential when global competition is far more reliant on global trade and economic power, britain alone could not compete with blocs like the americans or chinese but europe as a whole could do so via the EU, nationalism is just constantly evolving via similar groups negating against far more different peoples which leads to the creation of a unified identity (how the germans unified instead of squabbling as regional monarchies, how american white identity was formed via negation against black slaves and native americans, how roman identity was formed and began to include other itallic groups when negating against the celtic barbarians/invaders and enemies of rome)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
I’m 50% zagrosian, does that mean I take credit for all of Iran, Iraq, the elamites, and every other society that was built by zagrosians? No.
yes u should because the Middle East would benefit from some civilization building. If more mena people went back to their roots theyd fix up quickly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: americanpakitruvcel
India at most has like 10-15% yamnaya dna at most

View attachment 5632422

Also its a recessive trait and the europeans that came to india, founded the religions, got their dicks sucked so hard by the local pajeeta population they killed off their genes. Only few people in india have light brown hair, and nearly none are blonde
my classmate is blonde blue eyed all the girls are after him
 
We are yamnaya lol .

What are you btw baltic ?
No, the Steppe ancestry in South Asians come from either the Andronovo or Sintashta cultures, not Yamnaya. Yamnaya is the ancestor culture of the other two.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist, americanpakitruvcel and mr007
India at most has like 10-15% yamnaya dna at most

View attachment 5632422

Also its a recessive trait and the europeans that came to india, founded the religions, got their dicks sucked so hard by the local pajeeta population they killed off their genes. Only few people in india have light brown hair, and nearly none are blonde
We South Asians don’t have Yamnaya DNA. It’s from the Andronovo or Sintashta culture.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars, JewishNationalist, americanpakitruvcel and 1 other person
More like blonde hair came from siberia and light skin from anatolia yamnaya ancestors (R) were high t mongoloid bulls who fucked with everyone so they inherited caucasoid skull light hair and pale skin that they spread to other places
This is true, blond(e) came from ANE; not Yamnaya.

@FiendFiend @mr007 @americanpakitruvcel
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist, americanpakitruvcel, mr007 and 1 other person
I’m 50% zagrosian, does that mean I take credit for all of Iran, Iraq, the elamites, and every other society that was built by zagrosians? No.
Actually, the Iran_N component in South Asians doesn’t come directly from the Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers. Instead, it comes from a population related to but distinct from Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers. We South Asians get it from CIHG, Caucasus/Iranian hunter-gatherers. The only groups of people in South Asia who do have ancestry from Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers are the Baloch who are restricted to Pakistan (and Afghanistan and Iran), which makes sense since they descend from BMAC.
 
  • +1
Reactions: mr007
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
No, the Steppe ancestry in South Asians come from either the Andronovo or Sintashta cultures, not Yamnaya. Yamnaya is the ancestor culture of the other two.
Ik bhai i was just quoting him
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
yes u should because the Middle East would benefit from some civilization building. If more mena people went back to their roots theyd fix up quickly.
I am south Asian, not middle eastern, hence why I even took such interested in the origins of the proto indo aryans. A solid 20% of my dna is likely from these people, MENA is fucked rn but will return to its former glory hopefully one day, I have little hope for South Asia(aside from Bangladesh 🤑)
 
Actually, the Iran_N component in South Asians doesn’t come directly from the Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers. Instead, it comes from a population related to but distinct from Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers. We South Asians get it from CIHG, Caucasus/Iranian hunter-gatherers. The only groups of people in South Asia who do have ancestry from Zagros/Neolithic Iranian farmers are the Baloch who are restricted to Pakistan (and Afghanistan and Iran), which makes sense since they descend from BMAC.
I have many family members with bmac phenotypes, I almost certainly have Zagros Neolithic and Zagros hunter gatherer dna imo, but if euros want to claim the eastern branch of corded ware it’s like me claiming all the accomplishments of Zagros and CHG people. Only the people directly descended from the proto indo aryans should claim them lol why should their cousins take their name
 
My dad is ANE shifted ngl, with darker skin and AASI influence of course but it’s strong enough to where my siblings look psuedo Latino sometimes imo
This is true, blond(e) came from ANE; not Yamnaya.

@FiendFiend @mr007 @americanpakitruvcel
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
In the age of globalization it just makes more sense to unite with far more similar people (IE becoming more pan-northwestern european in this context), petty nationalism of the old is just far more detrimental as opposed to acting as a unified bloc via stuff like the EU (not the modern conception but the concept itself was a great idea) is essential when global competition is far more reliant on global trade and economic power, britain alone could not compete with blocs like the americans or chinese but europe as a whole could do so via the EU, nationalism is just constantly evolving via similar groups negating against far more different peoples which leads to the creation of a unified identity (how the germans unified instead of squabbling as regional monarchies, how american white identity was formed via negation against black slaves and native americans, how roman identity was formed and began to include other itallic groups when negating against the celtic barbarians/invaders and enemies of rome)
I simply view the world differently man, i dont identify with race that strongly, im an individual who happens to belong to my race, and its neat to know about my genetic background, but at the end of the day we are one species and one people
 
  • +1
Reactions: FiendFiend and Gengar’s Ghost
In the age of globalization it just makes more sense to unite with far more similar people (IE becoming more pan-northwestern european in this context), petty nationalism of the old is just far more detrimental as opposed to acting as a unified bloc via stuff like the EU (not the modern conception but the concept itself was a great idea) is essential when global competition is far more reliant on global trade and economic power, britain alone could not compete with blocs like the americans or chinese but europe as a whole could do so via the EU, nationalism is just constantly evolving via similar groups negating against far more different peoples which leads to the creation of a unified identity (how the germans unified instead of squabbling as regional monarchies, how american white identity was formed via negation against black slaves and native americans, how roman identity was formed and began to include other itallic groups when negating against the celtic barbarians/invaders and enemies of rome)
yeah blocs matter the most now
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hess
But op keep saying it came from yamnaya people
Well, then why stop there? Might as well just say we are all just Africans.
 
I have many family members with bmac phenotypes, I almost certainly have Zagros Neolithic and Zagros hunter gatherer dna imo, but if euros want to claim the eastern branch of corded ware it’s like me claiming all the accomplishments of Zagros and CHG people. Only the people directly descended from the proto indo aryans should claim them lol why should their cousins take their name
It’s from CIHG: Caucasus/Iranian hunter-gatherers. They were related to but distinct from Zagros farmers. It’s like Steppe; we don’t get it directly from Europeans, but rather from Central Asians. We got it from a population related to, yet distinct, from them. You do have some DNA from them, but it didn’t come from them directly. That’s the misconception I was clearing up. The Baloch have up to 60% Iran_N DNA, but even then nearly half of it comes from Zagros farmers due to them descending from BMAC. That’s why their qpAdm results need different sources than us. I haven’t figured out how much of mine would be allocated to those Zagros farmers; but I expect it to be 15%, and I score 53.5% Iran_N on qpAdm. And that was 44.2% “Zagros Neolithic farmer” according to IllustrativeDNA, but it’s not accurate as it’s quite outdated.
 
My dad is ANE shifted ngl, with darker skin and AASI influence of course but it’s strong enough to where my siblings look psuedo Latino sometimes imo
What do you mean by ANE-shifted? South Asians don’t have much ANE-related ancestry, IIRC? I could be wrong, though. I haven’t really been interested in ANE, probably because I do not carry R1a.
 
they derived from yamnaya
Indirectly, but not directly. What I mean is that it wasn’t the Yamnaya people who were mixing with South Asian hunter-gatherers, but people related to the Yamnaya were mixing with South Asian hunter-gatherers. The distinction is important.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist

Similar threads

filthycurrycel
Replies
0
Views
17
filthycurrycel
filthycurrycel
horseman.
Replies
22
Views
128
frantanyl
frantanyl
C
Replies
3
Views
62
jgrey080
jgrey080
Zeuxx
Replies
11
Views
80
alladinbvs
alladinbvs
howuglyami
Replies
0
Views
30
howuglyami
howuglyami

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top