HIGHEST SMV FACE EVER?

PubertyMaxxer

PubertyMaxxer

Face, Height, Frame, Dick
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Posts
15,376
Reputation
19,446
Nah
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lars, Deleted member 13137 and Deleted member 13710
ever? I'd say even no to JBs.. let alone ever.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 12216
psl 5.75
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 12216 and bwrauycnee
His comment section is full of decent looking young girls.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 12216
Masc Femboys is the future. I would say not psl wise but smv wise. @BrendioEEE
 
  • +1
Reactions: aBetterMii
incel in 2022
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Amexmaxx
looks very good imo prolly a jbs slayer
 
lacks bones to be chad
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot and Deleted member 12216
high SMV among faggots
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
btw guys like these legit dont fare well with women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Toth's thot
BA6E237E 284C 42AE BDB3 81935202AB58
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Amexmaxx
Looks insane, can attract any JB he wants to.
 
This thread just proves how retarded this forum is

“He has infinite SMV”
“He is incel in 2021”
“Only attractive to jbs”
“High tier normie”
“Lacks bones to be Chad”

just shut the fuck this guy is obviously very good looking and would do exceptionally well with women
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Amexmaxx, Deleted member 14192, JamesHowlett and 2 others
:feelshah:Wish I looked like him
 
looks submissive and breedable
 
He’s not ugly but there’s better
 
This thread just proves how retarded this forum is

“He has infinite SMV”
“He is incel in 2021”
“Only attractive to jbs”
“High tier normie”
“Lacks bones to be Chad”

just shut the fuck this guy is obviously very good looking and would do exceptionally well with women
Yea hes easy easy chadlite, anything below is mega cope. Although far from highest smv
 

Similar threads

BabuJi
Replies
4
Views
60
goo25
goo25
CyriliusTheFifth
Replies
8
Views
68
Sakl
Sakl
wild salmon
Replies
22
Views
141
mortis
mortis
ivanvelchev
Replies
4
Views
94
surronz
surronz
serhatdpoot
Replies
10
Views
122
why not?
why not?

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top