S
Saint Casanova
Kraken
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2023
- Posts
- 16,216
- Reputation
- 16,584
Destroying the no gym for frame nonsense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Destroying the no gym for frame nonsense.
Destroying the no gym for frame nonsense.
It looks like both tbh. Incels on here will say he has klinefelters if he posted his before on here.Looks like he just had a bad fat distribution rather then horrible frame, although his hips are still wide not wider then clavicles which is what matters most
I agree, but this guy clearly had a good response to training and probably roids so it’s uncommon to have such a drastic transformation.i keep saying this you can literally get so much delt growth that it compensates but people get mad at me when i say it for some reason like phil heath aint a 7 time olympian for no reason. Legitmately all natties have this waist to hip ratio at above 10% bf but once you drop below youlose mass so you just start looking like a skeleton
My physique sucks but I’m going to gym maxx bc I’m bored, I’ve noticed my delts and back grow at a faster rate then the rest of my muscles and people mistake that for good body building genetics when it’s just the fact that the rest of my physique is shit and is going to take long to build up bc on my Lanklet frame and tiny wrist and it’s brutal I’m not even that talli keep saying this you can literally get so much delt growth that it compensates but people get mad at me when i say it for some reason like phil heath aint a 7 time olympian for no reason
i mean i feel like ive never seen good natty delts while lean ever if you look at true natty competitions they're legs and arms just deflate so badly while lean like its almost cringe looking at them, only argument that can be made are people at or under 5'6 especially literal midgets if you see their muscle density around the delts they look roid tier even when they don't work outMy physique sucks but I’m going to gym maxx bc I’m bored, I’ve noticed my delts and back grow at a faster rate then the rest of my muscles and people mistake that for good body building genetics when it’s just the fact that the rest of my physique is shit and is going to take long to build up bc on my Lanklet frame and tiny wrist and it’s brutal I’m not even that tall
Yeah short black dudes get capped delts just from cardio and they are naturally leani mean i feel like ive never seen good natty delts while lean ever if you look at true natty competitions they're legs and arms just deflate so badly while lean like its almost cringe looking at them, only argument that can be made are people at or under 5'6 especially literal midgets if you see their muscle density around the delts they look roid tier even when they don't work out
I think some blacks have naturally big delts/ capped 3d shape since they’re receptors are heavily concentrated there.i mean i feel like ive never seen good natty delts while lean ever if you look at true natty competitions they're legs and arms just deflate so badly while lean like its almost cringe looking at them, only argument that can be made are people at or under 5'6 especially literal midgets if you see their muscle density around the delts they look roid tier even when they don't work out
i mean not enough to really be noticeable among other top natties the biggest deciding factor to me was how short. the top 3 are always around 5'6 like leel_lem is like 5'4 or something and he competed and placed 2nd behidn a black dude, that black dude was like around his height or maybe even shorter i don't rememberI think some blacks have naturally big delts/ capped 3d shape since they’re receptors are heavily concentrated there.
For me the main thing that suggests roids is having lots of muscle when very lean with a strong dry look.i mean not enough to really be noticeable among other top natties the biggest deciding factor to me was how short. the top 3 are always around 5'6 like leel_lem is like 5'4 or something and he competed and placed 2nd behidn a black dude, that black dude was like around his height or maybe even shorter i don't remember
ye like i feel like most people would get disappointed by natural bodybuilding because they just can't get that full look without being short im pretty confident everyone that placed top 5 in leels show was natty cause they all had that similar frame and delt to chest ratio. Also shows that the taller they are the lower they placed tooFor me the main thing that suggests roids is having lots of muscle when very lean with a strong dry look.
I’ve known some big naturals, guys who can bench 150kg natty and whilst they all looked big in clothes, they’re muscles were very watery, no vascularity or separation ect