aristocraticfool
𝖈𝖚𝖑𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊𝖉 𝖙𝖍𝖚𝖌
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2026
- Posts
- 47
- Reputation
- 60
Contrary to popular belief, Hitler was not an Alpinid or a Dinarid.
Hitler had none of the traits associated with the Alpinid & Dinarid Anthropological types.
He was dolichocephalic (exact opposite alpinid & dinaric phenotypes, impossible to occur if he was an alpinid or dinaric) He was dolichocephalic or within the lower end of mesocephalic (which, granted, is hard to tell because i do not have a picture off of the top of his head), tall, slender, moderately broad-shouldered, with heavy amounts of slope within the forehead in relation to Hallstatt Nordid examples. His nose is long, high bridged, characteristically prominent, with a straight, narrow-medium breadth. He was a textbook Keltic Nordid
He is more Nordic in relation to other KN examples though. Picture 1 is a KN example from England, and picture 2 is a Norwegian tronder example (to showcase that his side profile, especially within the ramus, gonion, and chin, indicate heavy excess Nordic influence)
Hitler had none of the traits associated with the Alpinid & Dinarid Anthropological types.
He was dolichocephalic (exact opposite alpinid & dinaric phenotypes, impossible to occur if he was an alpinid or dinaric) He was dolichocephalic or within the lower end of mesocephalic (which, granted, is hard to tell because i do not have a picture off of the top of his head), tall, slender, moderately broad-shouldered, with heavy amounts of slope within the forehead in relation to Hallstatt Nordid examples. His nose is long, high bridged, characteristically prominent, with a straight, narrow-medium breadth. He was a textbook Keltic Nordid
He is more Nordic in relation to other KN examples though. Picture 1 is a KN example from England, and picture 2 is a Norwegian tronder example (to showcase that his side profile, especially within the ramus, gonion, and chin, indicate heavy excess Nordic influence)
