Horizontally narrow orbitals are a large contributor to low IPD

mvp2v1

mvp2v1

Show me your bones & I will show you ur destiny
Joined
Mar 24, 2022
Posts
5,291
Reputation
4,474
Horizontally narrow orbitals are a large contributor to low IPD. Obviously, there are multiple factors influencing low IPD, there is a genetic component and there is a facial growth component. That said I believe everyone in the modern world has lower IPD and PFL than they should because I believe everyone has smaller jaws than they should.

Its clear that small jaws and vertical growth leads to orbitals which appear to be closer set and narrower:
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 121129AM
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 121445AM
Screen Shot 2023 02 04 at 63522 PM


When I look at cases of people with close-set eyes I notice that they often have very narrow-looking orbitals (judging by the lack of "stretching of eye area soft tissues")

Example:
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 120144AM

Something seems off even after a good OBO. Obviously, our first reaction would be oh its because of narrow PFL he needs tripod!
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 120348AM
Note that the medial canthus and the broader PFL both appear to come from a wide orbital.

But I wonder, could it be that all he needed was wider orbitals? Looking at the image on the right:
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 122205AM

It would seem like there is not much difference in how far apart the orbitals actually are (looking at image on right), most of the difference is in the width of the orbitals which I think causes the eyeballs to sit further apart. The eyeball should naturally be centered in the orbital.

With that said when looking at the simulation on the left it would seem like the orbitals are indeed somewhat further apart. And its probably a more trustworthy data point.


So what's the solution?

Theoretically, the ideal solution would be OBO+tripod.
Screenshot 2024 03 23 at 120508AM


Or bone remodeling.

TLDR: I suspect that orbital width both impacts PFL and IPD.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: mandiblade, Amphisbaena, Narroworbits and 6 others
Okay:)
 
  • Woah
Reactions: mvp2v1
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
nigger coon faggot negro
 
  • Woah
Reactions: mvp2v1
Well I have low IPD but good PFL so I guess that my orbitals are not that narrow

I know people with ultra wide IPD and small PFL too
 
  • +1
Reactions: mvp2v1
Well I have low IPD but good PFL so I guess that my orbitals are not that narrow

I know people with ultra wide IPD and small PFL too
yes there is a notable genetic component. The main point of my post was to say
that orbital width notably contributes to IPD (in nature).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Clavicular and Akatlyn
this got giga burried by a bunch of shitspew so i missed it but amazing thread
 
  • +1
Reactions: Alexios and mvp2v1
@Narroworbits
 
  • +1
Reactions: Narroworbits
Horizontally narrow orbitals are a large contributor to low IPD. Obviously, there are multiple factors influencing low IPD, there is a genetic component and there is a facial growth component. That said I believe everyone in the modern world has lower IPD and PFL than they should because I believe everyone has smaller jaws than they should.

Its clear that small jaws and vertical growth leads to orbitals which appear to be closer set and narrower:
View attachment 2814898View attachment 2814897View attachment 2814896

When I look at cases of people with close-set eyes I notice that they often have very narrow-looking orbitals (judging by the lack of "stretching of eye area soft tissues")

Example:
View attachment 2814885
Something seems off even after a good OBO. Obviously, our first reaction would be oh its because of narrow PFL he needs tripod!
View attachment 2814887Note that the medial canthus and the broader PFL both appear to come from a wide orbital.

But I wonder, could it be that all he needed was wider orbitals? Looking at the image on the right:
View attachment 2814899
It would seem like there is not much difference in how far apart the orbitals actually are (looking at image on right), most of the difference is in the width of the orbitals which I think causes the eyeballs to sit further apart. The eyeball should naturally be centered in the orbital.

With that said when looking at the simulation on the left it would seem like the orbitals are indeed somewhat further apart. And its probably a more trustworthy data point.


So what's the solution?

Theoretically, the ideal solution would be OBO+tripod.
View attachment 2814888

Or bone remodeling.

TLDR: I suspect that orbital width both impacts PFL and IPD.
io thinking at this
pull your lateral orbital bone with your thumb , Is autistic?
 
Horizontally narrow orbitals are a large contributor to low IPD. Obviously, there are multiple factors influencing low IPD, there is a genetic component and there is a facial growth component. That said I believe everyone in the modern world has lower IPD and PFL than they should because I believe everyone has smaller jaws than they should.

Its clear that small jaws and vertical growth leads to orbitals which appear to be closer set and narrower:
View attachment 2814898View attachment 2814897View attachment 2814896

When I look at cases of people with close-set eyes I notice that they often have very narrow-looking orbitals (judging by the lack of "stretching of eye area soft tissues")

Example:
View attachment 2814885
Something seems off even after a good OBO. Obviously, our first reaction would be oh its because of narrow PFL he needs tripod!
View attachment 2814887Note that the medial canthus and the broader PFL both appear to come from a wide orbital.

But I wonder, could it be that all he needed was wider orbitals? Looking at the image on the right:
View attachment 2814899
It would seem like there is not much difference in how far apart the orbitals actually are (looking at image on right), most of the difference is in the width of the orbitals which I think causes the eyeballs to sit further apart. The eyeball should naturally be centered in the orbital.

With that said when looking at the simulation on the left it would seem like the orbitals are indeed somewhat further apart. And its probably a more trustworthy data point.


So what's the solution?

Theoretically, the ideal solution would be OBO+tripod.
View attachment 2814888

Or bone remodeling.

TLDR: I suspect that orbital width both impacts PFL and IPD.
They aren’t narrow per say - they are just long, which is exactly what makes them look more compact AND appear closer together. Higher eye aspect ratio = less rounded look.
 
They aren’t narrow per say - they are just long, which is exactly what makes them look more compact AND appear closer together. Higher eye aspect ratio = less rounded look.
I dont understand, are you saying they arent narrow but rather vertically long?
 
Horizontally narrow orbitals are a large contributor to low IPD. Obviously, there are multiple factors influencing low IPD, there is a genetic component and there is a facial growth component. That said I believe everyone in the modern world has lower IPD and PFL than they should because I believe everyone has smaller jaws than they should.

Its clear that small jaws and vertical growth leads to orbitals which appear to be closer set and narrower:
View attachment 2814898View attachment 2814897View attachment 2814896

When I look at cases of people with close-set eyes I notice that they often have very narrow-looking orbitals (judging by the lack of "stretching of eye area soft tissues")

Example:
View attachment 2814885
Something seems off even after a good OBO. Obviously, our first reaction would be oh its because of narrow PFL he needs tripod!
View attachment 2814887Note that the medial canthus and the broader PFL both appear to come from a wide orbital.

But I wonder, could it be that all he needed was wider orbitals? Looking at the image on the right:
View attachment 2814899
It would seem like there is not much difference in how far apart the orbitals actually are (looking at image on right), most of the difference is in the width of the orbitals which I think causes the eyeballs to sit further apart. The eyeball should naturally be centered in the orbital.

With that said when looking at the simulation on the left it would seem like the orbitals are indeed somewhat further apart. And its probably a more trustworthy data point.


So what's the solution?

Theoretically, the ideal solution would be OBO+tripod.
View attachment 2814888

Or bone remodeling.

TLDR: I suspect that orbital width both impacts PFL and IPD.
Great thread. These few threads also piggybacked on this idea
 

Similar threads

Asiangymmax
Discussion My confession
Replies
39
Views
638
Xangsane is SHIT
Xangsane is SHIT
leF
Replies
8
Views
2K
lewunknownslayer55
lewunknownslayer55
kana
Replies
22
Views
1K
saggyballsackcel
saggyballsackcel
Kirby9784
Replies
29
Views
2K
Kirby9784
Kirby9784

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top