Horseface is ideal confirmed

Which is most ideal fwhr?

  • 2.2+ fwhr

  • 2.1 fwhr

  • 2 fwhr

  • 1.9 fwhr

  • 1.05 midface ratio

  • 1.0 midface ratio

  • 0.95 midface ratio


Results are only viewable after voting.
EnglandBadman

EnglandBadman

Ex Drug Dealer
Joined
Aug 19, 2023
Posts
5,717
Reputation
6,774
DC3567E0 0FED 4243 8FB6 6596C5D0A399

Women found the 3rd pic most attractive while looksmaxxers assumed the 4th pic would be seen as most attractive probably cos most looksmaxxers are biased towards compact midface dom looking men like jordan barret.

Do you think having a very compact/high FWDH ratio is attractive?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 23558 and Deleted member 22918
4th pic looks the best, but in general FWHR is not that important

Also, 1.9 is nowhere near horse tier, that would be like 1.7ish and below
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: fuse and Deleted member 23558
but in general FWHR is not that important

Also, 1.9 is nowhere near horse tier, that would be like 1.7ish and below
really? Why is fwhr not important?

Ik 1.9 isnt extreme but also i knew, realistically no one would vote for anything under 1.9 so i just didnt include it as an option
 
Source:
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
really? Why is fwhr not important?

Ik 1.9 isnt extreme but also i knew, realistically no one would vote for anything under 1.9 so i just didnt include it as an option
1.9 is actually considered pretty wide, if you measure correctly.

I say not important because a wide range of fwhrs are “acceptable” and can still produce hyper-attractive faces.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fuse
1.9 is actually considered pretty wide, if you measure correctly.

I say not important because a wide range of fwhrs are “acceptable” and can still produce hyper-attractive faces.
I didnt realise 1.9 is considered wide cos i my fwhr ratio is 1.9 and i have a longer horseface so i assumed its long.

Yeah true, as long as your fwhr is harmonious to average proportions and your features, it doesn’t really matter Irl. I dont know any models with a lower fwhr ratio tho.
 
I didnt realise 1.9 is considered wide cos i my fwhr ratio is 1.9 and i have a longer horseface so i assumed its long.

Yeah true, as long as your fwhr is harmonious to average proportions and your features, it doesn’t really matter Irl. I dont know any models with a lower fwhr ratio tho.
It’s unlikely you have a long face with a 1.9 fwhr. You’re probably not measuring it correctly.

Model examples: Tyler Maher, Gabriel Aubry, Zach Cox.
 
this post was made by syrian psycho
 
What the heck, normies understand appeal more then we do
Matt Leblanc Wow GIF by NowThis
 
  • JFL
Reactions: EnglandBadman

Similar threads

lavv
Replies
4
Views
308
CD34
CD34
leF
Replies
27
Views
2K
CorinthianLOX
CorinthianLOX
134applesauce456
2
Replies
62
Views
2K
AlphaLooksmaxxer666
AlphaLooksmaxxer666

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top