Theory How agriculture fucked up human development

Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
Before agriculture humans were hunter-gatherers living in small groups, hunted for some ours and mostly chilled for the rest of the day
"Research suggested that hunter gatherers worked between 15 and 20 hours a week"
In contrast to that humans living in agriculture had to work much longer to take care of their fields and they built up bigger and stricter hierachies
Human bodies were well developed cause they ate a very nutritous diet high in vitamins we and people living in agiculture lack like A, K2, D etc
Humans became shorter when living in agriculture
330px Human heights over the long run OWID

Our maxillae and craniofacial development became worse cause of the diet and reduced breastfeeding(naturally at least 3 years)
Screenshot 20210612 150951 Google
Screenshot 20210721 151209 Google

Also human brains have shrunk for 15-20 % since then
Thougths @Pythagoras @TsarTsar444 @lutte @FastBananaCEO @Baldingman1998 @thecel @astatine
 
Last edited:
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
maxxedfalloutdweller

maxxedfalloutdweller

intp, big dick tiny man
Joined
Jul 14, 2020
Posts
5,685
Reputation
7,706
Op is right we did live better as hunter gathers

we also had higher psls its a same it is the way it is now
 
looksmaxxer234

looksmaxxer234

Zephir
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Posts
30,836
Reputation
117,662
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
You literally said archaic humans
not in the first post
Screenshot 20210729 210506 Chrome

just this one and it's two models and modern humans score higher in regsrds to the left one and earlier humans and archaic humans higher in the rigth one
 
Deleted member 5802

Deleted member 5802

Zephir
Joined
Mar 16, 2020
Posts
7,545
Reputation
9,753
Industrial revolution was a big mistake humanity wasn’t ment to live like this we are social creatures for a reason. It’s why people are less happy and more depressed despite our world being the safest in all of human history technology fucked us all
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
Not at all. People closet to hunter gatherer skulls are abos. And you can see why it’s not a good thing with them.
no they are closer to early human species like denisovans or neanderthals
has nothing to do with hunter gatherer homo spapiens
 
chadrone96

chadrone96

I fucking hate my shitole country
Joined
Nov 16, 2019
Posts
570
Reputation
478
Hi
Before agriculture humans were hunter-gatherers living in small groups, hunted for some ours and mostly chilled for the rest of the day
"Research suggested that hunter gatherers worked between 15 and 20 hours a week"
In contrast to that humans living in agriculture had to work much longer to take care of their fields and they built up bigger and stricter hierachies
Human bodies were well developed cause they ate a very nutritous diet high in vitamins we and people living in agiculture lack like A, K2, D etc
Humans became shorter when living in agriculture
View attachment 1337161
Our maxillae and craniofacial development became worse cause of the diet and reduced breastfeeding(naturally at least 3 years)
View attachment 1337164 View attachment 1337169
Also human brains have shrunk for 15-20 % since then
Thougths @Pythagoras @TsarTsar444 @lutte @FastBananaCEO @Baldingman1998 @thecel @astatine
High iQ post.
I always thought humans lived better when we were hunters, but when agriculture came we had to enslave ourselves for a few crumbs of food just for the benefit of cuck :soy:governments
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
Most people ik have bones
still less bones than a hunter gatherer google documentaries about massai tribe even tho they aren't living the exact same lifestyle most are tall, long skull, forward grown with mogger cheekbones
 
Last edited:
P

Pythagoras

Pieces must be sacrificed
Joined
Sep 1, 2021
Posts
4,587
Reputation
7,302
body height has been declining for 10 000 years
That's not true + we can determined height from past skeletons obviously and body armor, they were shorter. even 100 years back. what about the heights of the Soviets? Germans? the average height was like 168cm for a soviet soldier, how that's a decline? (even tho such rapid growth obviously is because lifestyle) I'm sure you have some answer because you're not dumb enough not to know this, so give it.
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
That's not true + we can determined height from past skeletons obviously and body armor, they were shorter. even 100 years back. what about the heights of the Soviets? Germans? the average height was like 168cm for a soviet soldier, how that's a decline? I'm sure you have some answer because you're not dumb enough not to know this, so give it.
Heigth has only been rising for the last 200 hundert years because we eat more meat, eggs and milk than a middle age guy
 
looksmaxxer234

looksmaxxer234

Zephir
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Posts
30,836
Reputation
117,662
still less bones than a hunter gatherer google documentaries about massai tribe even tho they aren't living the exact same lifestyle most are tall, long skull, forward grown with mogger cheekbones
Yea ik modern diets are not good

All I was just trying to say

This skull
2ACF8294 D1C9 473B 9AC9 3CFD7B467EC7


Is better than this
8B516B12 647D 499B A496 974ED431A54A
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
Yea ik modern diets are not good

All I was just trying to say

This skull
View attachment 1337253

Is better than this
View attachment 1337254
The skull below is an extreme example for a hunter gatherer skull
Images 11 1

this gives you a better understanding about the difference
the ligther skull is the modern one if not obv.
So we eat more 5000 years ago? 10000 years ago? doesn't make sense.
Heigth has decreased for the last 10000 years
Only two hundred ago this trend reversed and it was/is increasing again
View attachment 1337252
I don’t get it they look like such moggers in these pictures yet nowadays they look like homo erectus
View attachment 1337255
prob. also shitty western diet but they're barely homo sapiens so it's in general strange dor normal humans to rate them
 
looksmaxxer234

looksmaxxer234

Zephir
Joined
Aug 11, 2020
Posts
30,836
Reputation
117,662
The skull below is an extreme example for a hunter gatherer skull
View attachment 1337259
this gives you a better understanding about the difference
the ligther skull is the modern one if not obv.

Heigth has decreased for the last 10000 years
Only two hundred ago this trend reversed and it was/is increasing again

prob. also shitty western diet but they're barely homo sapiens so it's in general strange dor normal humans to rate them
k nvm guess I was wrong
 
lutte

lutte

💤
Joined
Jul 17, 2020
Posts
29,424
Reputation
54,352
That's not true + we can determined height from past skeletons obviously and body armor, they were shorter. even 100 years back. what about the heights of the Soviets? Germans? the average height was like 168cm for a soviet soldier, how that's a decline? (even tho such rapid growth obviously is because lifestyle) I'm sure you have some answer because you're not dumb enough not to know this, so give it.
Wdym it’s well established heigyt went down after agriculture or do you mean a continous decline? Yeah we caught up now mostly
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
Wdym it’s well established heigyt went down after agriculture or do you mean a continous decline? Yeah we caught up now mostly
But not on the skull and face tho
 
Deleted member 8244

Deleted member 8244

white/ 6'0/🇺🇸
Joined
Jul 7, 2020
Posts
10,278
Reputation
10,045
the long occupult, also goes with your theory that long skull = higher es ratio ans better eye area.

humans were moggers back then
 
Deleted member 14848

Deleted member 14848

Zephir
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Posts
2,053
Reputation
4,384
the long occupult, also goes with your theory that long skull = higher es ratio ans better eye area.

humans were moggers back then
Yes but there's also a difference in anterior cranial length, glabella prominence
Theirs is longer more similiar to a cat which would mean a longer more forward orientated medial canthus
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top