how am i not chadlite with my harmony

[schizowillascend]

proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT

Proof i have 95%

Proof Maxlooksmax has 95% harmony

docs.google.com

proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess

 

[NorwoodAscender]

what’s ur ang here

 

[schizowillascend]

what’s ur ang here

i would assume its 5.75-6 range

 

[-=t3rm1n4t0r_2005=-]

flamingomaxxing

 

[crybaby]

Measured ct, eyebrow inclination and ipsilateral angle incorrectly. Canthal tilt is probably closer to 2°, eyebrow tilt ca. 5-8°, and ipsilateral angle closer to 100°, making the deviation to jaw frontal angle larger and less harmonious.

 

[schizowillascend]

Measured ct, eyebrow inclination and ipsilateral angle incorrectly. Canthal tilt is probably closer to 2°, eyebrow tilt ca. 5-8°, and ipsilateral angle closer to 100°, making the deviation to jaw frontal angle larger and less harmonious.

this is wrong, you measure canthal tilt from the medial to lateral canthus
eyebrow inclination, may be slightly off - but it is positive either way

and i measured ipsilateral alar angle correctly.

 

[appealmaxxingg]

Because you are morphed

 

[schizowillascend]

Measured ct, eyebrow inclination and ipsilateral angle incorrectly. Canthal tilt is probably closer to 2°, eyebrow tilt ca. 5-8°, and ipsilateral angle closer to 100°, making the deviation to jaw frontal angle larger and less harmonious.

my canthal tilt does LOOK bad, but as a ratio it is ideal (bad under eye support nerf)

 

[schizowillascend]

Because you are morphed

its a live photo bro, want me to send a video?

 

[renos]

proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT

Proof i have 95%

Proof Maxlooksmax has 95% harmony

docs.google.com

View attachment 3765858

proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess

you look good, Maybe its the asymmetry holding you back. A few of the measurements are wrong

here for example

 

[appealmaxxingg]

its a live photo bro, want me to send a video?

Bro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chad

 

[schizowillascend]

you look good, Maybe its the asymmetry holding you back. A few of the measurements are wrong

here for example

that is how you measure canthal tilt lmao, medial to lateral corner of the eye

you are just confused because i have a droopy lower lid

 

[schizowillascend]

Bro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chad

LMAO, this isn't morphed

 

[schizowillascend]

Bro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chad

It’s not morphed

 

[appealmaxxingg]

LMAO, this isn't morphed

It’s not morphed

If you want
Btw how do you measure facial harmony?

 

[schizowillascend]

If you want
Btw how do you measure facial harmony?

i have a formula - this isn't morphed btw

 

[renos]

that is how you measure canthal tilt lmao, medial to lateral corner of the eye

you are just confused because i have a droopy lower lid

Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)

 

[appealmaxxingg]

i have a formula - this isn't morphed btw

Can you do this for me actually?

 

[schizowillascend]

Can you do this for me actually?

yeah, not for free though

 

[appealmaxxingg]

yeah, not for free though

Ahh I can't pay
How do to it by myself?

 

[renos]

Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)

Not trying to insult you or anything, just wondering

 

[BrahimKine]

Asymmetry and nct is what holding u back from cl high htn though

 

[schizowillascend]

Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)

no, idk where you measured, its the bottom of the medial canthus to the lateral canthus

lemme find a clear image and show you an example

 

[schizowillascend]

Asymmetry and nct is what holding u back from cl high htn though

I have positive canthal tilt, i think you mean bad under eye support

 

[cromagnon]

good looking but your lip shape throws you off hard

 

[schizowillascend]

Asymmetry and nct is what holding u back from cl high htn though

what asymmetry do you notice btw?

 

[schizowillascend]

good looking but your lip shape throws you off hard

i mean yeah, its not that bad - its a slight deduction in features, not awful though

 

[cromagnon]

i mean yeah, its not that bad - its a slight deduction in features, not awful though

they're oversized, it doesnt matter tho probs easy fix with some sort of injection and ur eye area is good which is all that rlly matters

 

[BrahimKine]

what asymmetry do you notice btw?

One eye has a better under eye support than the other

 

[schizowillascend]

they're oversized, it doesnt matter tho probs easy fix with some sort of injection and ur eye area is good which is all that rlly matters

yeah they are oversized, but its not a huge flaw really, it doesn't deduct much

 

[schizowillascend]

One eye has a better under eye support than the other

what else?

 

[BrahimKine]

what else?

Thats it tbh, i said ubare chadlite in that one morph where u fixed the under eye support

 

[schizowillascend]

Thats it tbh, i said ubare chadlite in that one morph where u fixed the under eye support

yeah, might get fat grafting or infra implants, then i'm set

 

[BrahimKine]

yeah, might get fat grafting or infra implants, then i'm set

U are already set go out there and slay nga

 

[schizowillascend]

U are already set go out there and slay nga

just need insoles and shoulder pads

 

[crybaby]

The slight deviations come from you not measuring to the lateral canthi but some random point on your sclera

 

[crybaby]

You look good though delete your account asap and forget about the bp

 

[crybaby]

Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)

Yes, thats what I meant. Looks more neutral to me now. Similar issue with ipsilateral.

 

[dolphlundgren]

proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT

Proof i have 95%

Proof Maxlooksmax has 95% harmony

docs.google.com

View attachment 3765858

proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess

proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT

Proof i have 95%

Proof Maxlooksmax has 95% harmony

docs.google.com

View attachment 3765858

proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess

ur a low cl

 

[schizowillascend]

View attachment 3766260

ur a low cl

bro this is literally measured wrong, i literally proved with the images of the ratios - you must have measured wrong

 

[schizowillascend]

View attachment 3766260

ur a low cl

how did you get my cheekbone setting that low

 

[schizowillascend]

View attachment 3766260

ur a low cl

how did you get my eyebrow tilt off aswell, what was even the point of measuring when i put proof

 

[flatcheck213]

proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT

Proof i have 95%

Proof Maxlooksmax has 95% harmony

docs.google.com

View attachment 3765858

proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess

1.55x FWHR

 

[dolphlundgren]

how did you get my eyebrow tilt off aswell, what was even the point of measuring when i put proof

the point was to debunk your claim about having a 95% harmony. your cheekbones are actually tier 2 at 76%, not tier 3 like I got before. Your eyebrow tilt is barely positive at 1-2 degrees. your measurements were taken incorrectly

 

[dolphlundgren]

you're still better looking than 99.9% of these curries rating you htn, so idk what ur barking abt on me

 

[schizowillascend]

the point was to debunk your claim about having a 95% harmony. your cheekbones are actually tier 2 at 76%, not tier 3 like I got before. Your eyebrow tilt is barely positive at 1-2 degrees. your measurements were taken incorrectly

bro, you are just measuring my shit wrong, my cheekbones are barely below my eyes idk how your measuring

and you can just visually see my eyebrows are positive like what are you talking about - i promise you i measured correctly, it has been checked by others

i am 95% - but i am still only HTN because i have like 5.5 dimo, 5.5 angularity and 7.5 misc

and because they are so contrasting , it means i get a huge deduction to my score

 

[dolphlundgren]

bro, you are just measuring my shit wrong, my cheekbones are barely below my eyes idk how your measuring

and you can just visually see my eyebrows are positive like what are you talking about - i promise you i measured correctly, it has been checked by others

i am 95% - but i am still only HTN because i have like 5.5 dimo, 5.5 angularity and 7.5 misc

and because they are so contrasting , it means i get a huge deduction to my score

your dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10

 

[schizowillascend]

your dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10View attachment 3766611

yes, exactly - but there is a huge deduction is what i am saying for not having consistency in scores

i am high htn overall - also my total harmony isn't 95 its like 88 with side included

and yes my misc is 7.5, i get deducted for nose shape, nose tip, lip shape, some ear flaring

but i get addition because of colouring, hair etc

 

[schizowillascend]

your dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10View attachment 3766611

you are using creatingattractive dimo formula, it is bad
and his angularity formula imo

 

[dolphlundgren]

you are using creatingattractive dimo formula, it is bad
and his angularity formula imo

no, I promise I don't use his dimo formula for ang or dimo. I just take look at overall robustisity and sharpness of facial features and make an asessment on dimo and ang