Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
i would assume its 5.75-6 rangewhat’s ur ang here
this is wrong, you measure canthal tilt from the medial to lateral canthusMeasured ct, eyebrow inclination and ipsilateral angle incorrectly. Canthal tilt is probably closer to 2°, eyebrow tilt ca. 5-8°, and ipsilateral angle closer to 100°, making the deviation to jaw frontal angle larger and less harmonious.
my canthal tilt does LOOK bad, but as a ratio it is ideal (bad under eye support nerf)Measured ct, eyebrow inclination and ipsilateral angle incorrectly. Canthal tilt is probably closer to 2°, eyebrow tilt ca. 5-8°, and ipsilateral angle closer to 100°, making the deviation to jaw frontal angle larger and less harmonious.
its a live photo bro, want me to send a video?Because you are morphed
you look good, Maybe its the asymmetry holding you back. A few of the measurements are wrongproof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT
![]()
View attachment 3765858
proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess
Bro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chadits a live photo bro, want me to send a video?![]()
that is how you measure canthal tilt lmao, medial to lateral corner of the eyeyou look good, Maybe its the asymmetry holding you back. A few of the measurements are wrong![]()
here for example
LMAO, this isn't morphedBro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chad
It’s not morphedBro I saw your others threads I know you are morphed but this morph is definitely chad
LMAO, this isn't morphed![]()
If you wantIt’s not morphed
i have a formula - this isn't morphed btwIf you want
Btw how do you measure facial harmony?
Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)that is how you measure canthal tilt lmao, medial to lateral corner of the eye
you are just confused because i have a droopy lower lid
Can you do this for me actually?i have a formula - this isn't morphed btw
yeah, not for free thoughCan you do this for me actually?
Ahh I can't payyeah, not for free though
Not trying to insult you or anything, just wonderingIsn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)
no, idk where you measured, its the bottom of the medial canthus to the lateral canthusIsn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)
I have positive canthal tilt, i think you mean bad under eye supportAsymmetry and nct is what holding u back from cl high htn though
what asymmetry do you notice btw?Asymmetry and nct is what holding u back from cl high htn though
i mean yeah, its not that bad - its a slight deduction in features, not awful thoughgood looking but your lip shape throws you off hard
i mean yeah, its not that bad - its a slight deduction in features, not awful though
One eye has a better under eye support than the otherwhat asymmetry do you notice btw?
yeah they are oversized, but its not a huge flaw really, it doesn't deduct muchthey're oversized, it doesnt matter tho probs easy fix with some sort of injection and ur eye area is good which is all that rlly matters
what else?One eye has a better under eye support than the other
Thats it tbh, i said ubare chadlite in that one morph where u fixed the under eye supportwhat else?
yeah, might get fat grafting or infra implants, then i'm setThats it tbh, i said ubare chadlite in that one morph where u fixed the under eye support
U are already set go out there and slay ngayeah, might get fat grafting or infra implants, then i'm set
just need insoles and shoulder padsU are already set go out there and slay nga
Yes, thats what I meant. Looks more neutral to me now. Similar issue with ipsilateral.Isn’t it more like that? (Red Lines)
proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT
![]()
View attachment 3765858
proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess
ur a low clproof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT
![]()
View attachment 3765858
proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess
bro this is literally measured wrong, i literally proved with the images of the ratios - you must have measured wrong
how did you get my cheekbone setting that low
how did you get my eyebrow tilt off aswell, what was even the point of measuring when i put proof
proof i have 95% - probably top 100 male harmony OAT
![]()
View attachment 3765858
proof that angularity, dimorphism and features are law i guess
the point was to debunk your claim about having a 95% harmony. your cheekbones are actually tier 2 at 76%, not tier 3 like I got before. Your eyebrow tilt is barely positive at 1-2 degrees. your measurements were taken incorrectlyhow did you get my eyebrow tilt off aswell, what was even the point of measuring when i put proof
bro, you are just measuring my shit wrong, my cheekbones are barely below my eyes idk how your measuringthe point was to debunk your claim about having a 95% harmony. your cheekbones are actually tier 2 at 76%, not tier 3 like I got before. Your eyebrow tilt is barely positive at 1-2 degrees. your measurements were taken incorrectly
your dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10bro, you are just measuring my shit wrong, my cheekbones are barely below my eyes idk how your measuring
and you can just visually see my eyebrows are positive like what are you talking about - i promise you i measured correctly, it has been checked by others
i am 95% - but i am still only HTN because i have like 5.5 dimo, 5.5 angularity and 7.5 misc
and because they are so contrasting , it means i get a huge deduction to my score
yes, exactly - but there is a huge deduction is what i am saying for not having consistency in scoresyour dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10View attachment 3766611
you are using creatingattractive dimo formula, it is badyour dimorphism is not 5.5, it's 6. angularity is also not 5.5, it's 6. your misc are nowhere near 7.5, because you have a bad nose tip and nose size in general (doesn't fit ur archetype), ur under-eye support is bad and ur eyelid shape is brutal.but even if I take ur word for it and calculate ur score based on stats u provided, i end up with 7.3/10View attachment 3766611
no, I promise I don't use his dimo formula for ang or dimo. I just take look at overall robustisity and sharpness of facial features and make an asessment on dimo and angyou are using creatingattractive dimo formula, it is bad
and his angularity formula imo