How are pornstars not Stacies?

ICXCLuvr

ICXCLuvr

Jerking off and Killing Myself
Joined
Oct 14, 2023
Posts
20,598
Reputation
29,133
When they are legit paid for their physical attractiveness? @xye @NeedUndereyeSupport

I mean like the top 1% mainly
IMG 6034
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: iblamexyz, Short, erome and 3 others
rosalina mogs
 
  • +1
Reactions: erome, voks and xye
When they are legit paid for their physical attractiveness? @xye @NeedUndereyeSupport

I mean like the top 1% mainly
View attachment 5641996
because stacy is a facial ranking, and porn stars are usually sought after for their phenotype and/or body, making facial aesthetics not a priority
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible, Blondepawg'sDildo, nier and 2 others
true, nobody wants to jerk off to a ugly subhuman whale
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blondepawg'sDildo, xye, erome and 1 other person
She doesn’t even do porn it’s just nudes if your lucky
Nude videos + one leaked mid sextape in the dark. I just used her since she was an old image I had saved
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye, erome and Kruge
Bodymaxxed
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and erome
When they are legit paid for their physical attractiveness? @xye @NeedUndereyeSupport

I mean like the top 1% mainly
View attachment 5641996

It’s a great question, I do find the girl you took a photo of more attractive then say, Emma Watson, but then Stacy is a term for a facial ranking and these pornstars usually have a mid face with a great body
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blondepawg'sDildo, xye and ICXCLuvr
Nude videos + one leaked mid sextape in the dark. I just used her since she was an old image I had saved
rosalina mogs sophie rain
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
It’s a great question, I do find the girl you took a photo of more attractive then say, Emma Watson, but then Stacy is a term for a facial ranking and these pornstars usually have a mid face with a great body
Nope it’s for body
IMG 6582
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and NeedUndereyeSupport
stacies is a face thing not a body thing
I just showed proof that it’s not
Well I’m not too sure, the modern-day connotation of a ‘Stacy’ is neodepndent on facial proportions and facial aesthetics.
well then it’s flawed.

And it also implies that a Stacy with a “good face” (almost entirely subjective to measure) lives a completely different life than a ‘bodymaxxed ltb’ (oxymoron) when that’s not the case lol.

Stacy should be used broadly for all desire women.
 
  • +1
Reactions: NeedUndereyeSupport and xye
I just showed proof that it’s not

well then it’s flawed.

And it also implies that a Stacy with a “good face” (almost entirely subjective to measure) lives a completely different life than a ‘bodymaxxed ltb’ (oxymoron) when that’s not the case lol.

Stacy should be used broadly for all desire women.
thats a meme from virgin vs chad
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
that doesnt change that now its largely used facially even if somne niche image from 2015 used the term for an image of a woman that has everything
See my other reply. I should make a thread on this

Are u arguing that a Stacy lives a better or different life than a bodymaxxed ltb (not real) even tho they are both very desirable?
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
See my other reply. I should make a thread on this

Are u arguing that a Stacy lives a better or different life than a bodymaxxed ltb (not real) even tho they are both very desirable?
i didnt argue that at all btw i just said its a facial term which is an objective fact you can argue that they have higher smv but you cant call them stacies because they simply arent (except for maybe some exception but ive never heard of any)
 
I just showed proof that it’s not

well then it’s flawed.

And it also implies that a Stacy with a “good face” (almost entirely subjective to measure) lives a completely different life than a ‘bodymaxxed ltb’ (oxymoron) when that’s not the case lol.

Stacy should be used broadly for all desire women.

I agree Stacy should be used for that, but it’s just like rating a chad who’s 5’9, Colton Haynes as an example, if we were factoring height then I think he wouldn’t be as high as he is but he’s still Chad based on his face
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye and ICXCLuvr
i didnt argue that at all btw i just said its a facial term which is an objective fact you can argue that they have higher smv but you cant call them stacies because they simply arent (except for maybe some exception but ive never heard of any)
Okay well higher smv bodymaxxed girl>stacy
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye
I agree Stacy should be used for that, but it’s just like rating a chad who’s 5’9, Colton Haynes as an example, if we were factoring height then I think he wouldn’t be as high as he is but he’s still Chad based on his face
Height doesn’t hold a candle to men’s attractiveness the same way body does for women though.

Dudes ignore hideous faces on good bodies. Women don’t do the same regardless of what chronically online dudes say fr
 
  • +1
Reactions: xye, Blondepawg'sDildo and NeedUndereyeSupport
Height doesn’t hold a candle to men’s attractiveness the same way body does for women though.

Dudes ignore hideous faces on good bodies. Women don’t do the same regardless of what chronically online dudes say fr

Some girls automatically reject dudes if they don’t meet a certain height threshold, but some dudes do ignore hideous faces on good bodies, but the truth is there’s two types of men: body or face. I prefer face, don’t really care about ass or tits as long as you’re pretty
 
The only porn Stacy is Amara Maple 🇸🇮 but she only looked this good AFTER porn
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
When they are legit paid for their physical attractiveness? @xye @NeedUndereyeSupport

I mean like the top 1% mainly
View attachment 5641996
Obviously I'm aware you a ragebait/satire user but just on the off chance this is a serious thread

So it goes without saying, but someone's cranial facial rating is going to be different than someone who is earning millions from the porn industry

Someone like Sophie Rain, which you may agree or disagree I believe, is a very above average looking woman

See, men love to delude themselves. With someone who is average to above average, men believe that they can actually have a chance with her because she's indirectly average or uglier, whereas when we look at someone like a big viktoria secret models yes they are attractive but I don't know how many people have actually jerked off to them let's say people have, which I wouldn't be surprised about. It definitely wasn't their latest choice.

When it comes to people fapping it would almost entirely be based on their niche archetype which tends to be the cute average to above average

Those are the ones who perform the best, not the best, not of oat ie Stacy
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Someone like Sophie Rain, which you may agree or disagree I believe, is a very above average looking woman
Facially all she has is feminine features and dimorphism. She’s below average
When it comes to people fapping it would almost entirely be based on their niche archetype which tends to be the cute average to above average
no, we fap to popular things that tend to reflect natural standards like fertile bodies. No “niche” no one goons to archetypes unless they are a real gooner who wants to try something new but the average dude does not.


Just recognize that women with elite bodies (pornstars) are the most desired therefore they are Stacies
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamexyz

Similar threads

coomerndiaye
Replies
27
Views
122
Jahdyy
J
EyeHateGod
Replies
0
Views
15
EyeHateGod
EyeHateGod
Eldian
Replies
39
Views
255
moongazing
moongazing
ICXCLuvr
Replies
74
Views
295
Blondepawg'sDildo
Blondepawg'sDildo
tiesto
Replies
7
Views
65
tiesto
tiesto

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top