how bad is a fwhr of 1.88

Deleted member 14166

Deleted member 14166

Luminary
Joined
Jun 3, 2021
Posts
4,669
Reputation
4,402
title , dont have this ratio just saw it on a qoves video
 
title , dont have this ratio just saw it on a qoves video
I think a facial width to height ratio of 1.88 is perfectly ideal. Cavill has the same ratio, even Chico is in the same territory. Anything between 1.8-2.0 is ideal. Higher ratios like Barrett's 2.6 are a little too much and unideal, and give a bloated appearance -
Screenshot 20211204 191214

On the contrary extremely low ratio like 1.5 also leads to an unideal looking face -
Fwhrratios 1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14166

Similar threads

I
Replies
3
Views
40
Iluvsoftmaxxing
I
I
Replies
10
Views
98
IHateMyBarber
IHateMyBarber
T
Replies
2
Views
42
holyramus10001
holyramus10001
ZygomaticProjection
Rage FWHR
Replies
3
Views
73
anthony267
anthony267
leramus
Replies
2
Views
84
jesseblueman
jesseblueman

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →