How big is the smv gap between light skin north Indians and darker Dravidians

Deleted member 6273

Deleted member 6273

Brb detoxing, can't respond to DMs for now.
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Posts
8,999
Reputation
22,425
Curious since most north Indians I know don't do that bad with women
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gaia262
10461 1
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 6273
Pretty big, light colouring can evade curry tax
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8019, Deleted member 6723, Deleted member 9837 and 3 others
Similar threads

Users who ar
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 8019, Deleted member 2100, onnysk and 1 other person
not much, north indians usually have shit gracile bone development. dravidian BBC chadpreets like @SubhumanCurrycel mog hard.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 5'7 currychad, Deleted member 9344, f0rmless and 8 others
@SubhumanCurrycel @BigBoy @JustBeCurry @JustBeCurryBrah

Someone tag more curries
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2100
Similar threads

Users who ar
thx bro u always think about me
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AbandonShip
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: curryslayerordeath, Deleted member 3043 and Deleted member 6273
  • JFL
Reactions: turkproducer, Gaia262, Gengar’s Ghost and 5 others
Curious since most north Indians I know don't do that bad with women

it's big within south asian culture to tell u the truth. i get complimented on my pale skin by relatives and it's cringe. for whatever reason being light skin is the ultimate halo in curry land. ig it simply comes down to rarity = desirable
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 5746, mostuttersubhuman and 3 others
Its fucking ginormous. In India they only care about white skin. In the west the gap is pretty big too. But Id say dark skinned currys have a better chance at ascension in the west if they are gl, in India its game over of you are dark skinned.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 89153, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 5746 and 7 others
Its fucking ginormous. In India they only care about white skin. In the west the gap is pretty big too. But Id say dark skinned currys have a better chance at ascension in the west if they are gl, in India its game over of you are dark skinned.

jfl this is so true. dark skin curries unironically have it easier in the west because whites aren't as racist as curries
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 5746, mostuttersubhuman and 2 others
it's big within south asian culture to tell u the truth. i get complimented on my pale skin by relatives and it's cringe. for whatever reason being a light skin curry is the ultimate halo. ig it simply comes down to rarity = desirable

Your paki right, do pakis really have curry tax most I've known were really light skin and decent looking ngl.
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: SPFromNY914 and GymcelDoomer
Your paki right, do pakis really have curry tax most I've known were really light skin and decent looking ngl.

i refer to myself as curry purely for convenience sake cos there's not really a categorical term for light skin pathans within the online sphere. yes northern pakis on average are lighter than northern indians. colored eyes are also more common in pakistan.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Gengar’s Ghost, JustBeCurryBrah and 1 other person
Tbh India is quite diverse but I'd say, practically, a large gap. South India is mostly malnourishedcels.
Further North (or at least Central/Central-West, like Maharashtra) has better coloring definitely and way better development, richer cities, but the phenotypes seem to have worse bones I've observed. Thing is a lot of Dravidians are actually Caucasoid skull-wise, I think it might even be more than Central/North for whatever reason, but the coloring failos hard. Mix of both is common. Further North/North-east has near-white colouring but Persian (north) or Asian (north-east) phenotype.

In India, light skin is valued, definitely.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, Gaia262, johncruz12345 and 2 others
if you are talking about india then there is a big divide between dravidian and lighter skinned, lighter skinned people are treated better and are just seen as better people, not to mention the smv for being light skin in india
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344 and Deleted member 6273
it's big within south asian culture to tell u the truth. i get complimented on my pale skin by relatives and it's cringe. for whatever reason being light skin is the ultimate halo in curry land. ig it simply comes down to rarity = desirable

It's due to the Aryan invasions, and it is more of a thing in North India than South India. There is a fairly big correlation between Ancestral South Indian ancestry and caste ranking. Pathans have around 6% South Indian ancestry while Punjabis have like 10-20%. Gangetic North Indians vary from 20-50% with the higher amount of South Indian ancestry being attributed to lower caste.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, GymcelDoomer and Deleted member 6273
Tbh India is quite diverse but I'd say, practically, a large gap. South India is mostly malnourishedcels.
Further North (or at least Central/Central-West, like Maharashtra) has better coloring definitely and way better development, richer cities, but the phenotypes seem to have worse bones I've observed. Thing is a lot of Dravidians are actually Caucasoid skull-wise, I think it might even be more than Central/North for whatever reason, but the coloring failos hard. Mix of both is common. Further North/North-east has near-white colouring but Persian (north) or Asian (north-east) phenotype.

In India, light skin is valued, definitely.

The most Dravidian place of them all, Sri Lanka, is probably the most developed region in South Asia. It ironically gets shittier and shittier as you move north to the lighter skinned areas.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, f0rmless, SPFromNY914 and 2 others
Tbh India is quite diverse but I'd say, practically, a large gap. South India is mostly malnourishedcels.
Further North (or at least Central/Central-West, like Maharashtra) has better coloring definitely and way better development, richer cities, but the phenotypes seem to have worse bones I've observed. Thing is a lot of Dravidians are actually Caucasoid skull-wise, I think it might even be more than Central/North for whatever reason, but the coloring failos hard. Mix of both is common. Further North/North-east has near-white colouring but Persian (north) or Asian (north-east) phenotype.

In India, light skin is valued, definitely.
South India mog North India in terms of development. Kerala has the highest hdi (0.82 vs indian average is .50 or something) also Maharashtra people look like Dravidians mostly

Curious since most north Indians I know don't do that bad with women
Light skin is a huge halo in India. But just because you're from North India doesn't make you much better than South Indian in west i think. By North Indian many people think of Persians and Afghans but they have totally different pheno compared to an average North Indian.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, JustBeCurryBrah, GymcelDoomer and 1 other person
South India mog North India in terms of development. Kerala has the highest hdi (0.82 vs indian average is .50 or something) also Maharashtra people look like Dravidians mostly


Light skin is a huge halo in India. But just because you're from North India doesn't make you much better than South Indian in west i think. By North Indian many people think of Persians and Afghans but they have totally different pheno compared to an average North Indian.

When people say North Indians, they probably mean North-West Indians from the likes of Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: litaz, Deleted member 9344, Deleted member 1751 and 1 other person
When people say North Indians, they probably mean North-West Indians from the likes of Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana etc.

Yeah I always think punjab when I hear north indian
 
South India mog North India in terms of development. Kerala has the highest hdi (0.82 vs indian average is .50 or something) also Maharashtra people look like Dravidians mostly


Light skin is a huge halo in India. But just because you're from North India doesn't make you much better than South Indian in west i think. By North Indian many people think of Persians and Afghans but they have totally different pheno compared to an average North Indian.
Fucking hell I'm not getting notifs for every response idk why.

Kerala alone perhaps. Still, vegetarian diet with very little protein and calcium = death-tier wrists and height.
I've only been to hotels in Mumbai so perhaps there would be a disproportionate amount of light skinned people, true.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, SPFromNY914, Deleted member 1751 and 1 other person
Yeah I always think punjab when I hear north indian

Punjabis are over-represented in diaspora population in countries like the UK and Canada. British Indians are mostly Punjabis and Gujaratis. In America I think a lot of the Indians are Telugu speakers from Andhra Pradesh.

"Indian culture" according to the West is also mostly just Punjabi culture (the goofy Hollywood dances for example)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344, SPFromNY914, Ocelot and 2 others
Fucking hell I'm not getting notifs for every response idk why.

Kerala alone perhaps. Still, vegetarian diet with very little protein and calcium = death-tier wrists and height.
I've only been to hotels in Mumbai so perhaps there would be a disproportionate amount of light skinned people, true.
Have you been to Chennai???
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ocelot
When people say North Indians, they probably mean North-West Indians from the likes of Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana etc.
They're good too. Cowbelt area is really bad especially Up
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ocelot
Its fucking ginormous. In India they only care about white skin. In the west the gap is pretty big too. But Id say dark skinned currys have a better chance at ascension in the west if they are gl, in India its game over of you are dark skinned.
Slaying in India as a mulatto?
 
Yes, over my life the times I’ve visited there would cumulate to around a year, maybe more.
Chennai is quite clean right
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Ocelot
Chennai is quite clean right
Not really.

I mean it isn’t to the point of filth covering the streets but overall stuff like billboards, inside shops, the sidewalks etc. aren’t properly maintained imo. Could require a paint job, a minor cleaning, or replacing the cement and stuff.

Definitely not as polished as a regular metropolitan city.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1751
Curious since most north Indians I know don't do that bad with women
Not all South Indians are dark. I have south indian family members who are same skin tone as me and they're from Kerala
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9344 and Deleted member 6273
Not all South Indians are dark. I have south indian family members who are same skin tone as me and they're from Kerala
U look black in ur pfp so it doesn't surprise me your south indian relatives are same color agit as u
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
i refer to myself as curry purely for convenience sake cos there's not really a categorical term for light skin pathans within the online sphere. yes northern pakis on average are lighter than northern indians. colored eyes are also more common in pakistan.
imho curries is a term for indic peoples only and you belong to an iranic group so therefore you arent curry. although theres plenty of iranic people that look indic.
 
Not all South Indians are dark. I have south indian family members who are same skin tone as me and they're from Kerala

ngl u look fully mulatto/black, them being the same coloring def makes them on the darker side. lightskinned ppl from south india usually have northern ancestry, since phenotype is p much directly correlated to that within the south asian subcontinent.

imho curries is a term for indic peoples only and you belong to an iranic group so therefore you arent curry. although theres plenty of iranic people that look indic.
tbh identifying as pakistani is 100000x times better than identifying as iranian, id much rather associate with high t jihadi slayers than estrogenic trannies

pathans are central asian fs, shouldnt be curry
 
ngl u look fully mulatto/black, them being the same coloring def makes them on the darker side. lightskinned ppl from south india usually have northern ancestry, since phenotype is p much directly correlated to that within the south asian subcontinent.


tbh identifying as pakistani is 100000x times better than identifying as iranian, id much rather associate with high t jihadi slayers than estrogenic trannies

pathans are central asian fs, shouldnt be curry
i think identifying as iranian is potentially better because their language is better jfl, in fact in pakistan they spoke farsi first before those cumskins came and forced urdu there.

also i dont agree that they are central asian, kazakhstanis, uzbeks, turkmens etc are all central asian. keep in mind that even though afghanistan is mostly considered central asian, most pathans live in pakistan and not afghanistan. we have 300% more of them, and this doesnt include the afghan refugees found in pakistan. although hazaras for instance are definitely central asian. much like pakistan, afghanistan is also ethnically diverse. we also have hazaras. not as much as afghanistan does though.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: curryslayerordeath
i think identifying as iranian is potentially better because their language is better jfl, in fact in pakistan they spoke farsi first before those cumskins came and forced urdu there.
cope son
1607497704020

tbh iranian culture is much more westernized and kinda lost most of its roots, most aspects of south asian culture are at least fairly native. also, it kinda makes me internally cringe when irl pakistanis (always girls lol) say some shit like "yea im pakistani but my genetics are actually persian".

also i dont agree that they are central asian, kazakhstanis, uzbeks, turkmens etc are all central asian. keep in mind that even though afghanistan is mostly considered central asian, most pathans live in pakistan and not afghanistan. we have 300% more of them, and this doesnt include the afghan refugees found in pakistan. although hazaras for instance are definitely central asian. much like pakistan, afghanistan is also ethnically diverse. we also have hazaras. not as much as afghanistan does though.
yea true tbh

crazy how all these vast phenotypes of different people live in a few, fairly small countries. im ngl, i though afghanistan had a much higher population than it actually does, pretty much dwarfed by pakistan.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar’s Ghost
Dravidian have better bones
 
cope son
View attachment 859334
tbh iranian culture is much more westernized and kinda lost most of its roots, most aspects of south asian culture are at least fairly native. also, it kinda makes me internally cringe when irl pakistanis (always girls lol) say some shit like "yea im pakistani but my genetics are actually persian".


yea true tbh

crazy how all these vast phenotypes of different people live in a few, fairly small countries. im ngl, i though afghanistan had a much higher population than it actually does, pretty much dwarfed by pakistan.
yeah i wasnt talking about iranian culture haha, i just like the language but thats about it. idc for iranian culture itself. imho i dont like those pakistanis, im a proud pakistani punjabi and would never want to be an afghan, an iranian, a saudi, a chechen, etc. unfortunately for me i do get mistaken for other nationalities, even an elderly man in pakistan thought i was arabic. and its not like im whiteskinned, im brown and i love it lol.

yeah i also thought afghanistan had the most pathans but thats not the case. same thing goes for punjabis, most are pakistani rather than indian but everyone thinks of indians instead.

here are the figures for pathans and punjabis respectively

afghanistan: 15.4 million
pakistan: 42.9 million

india: 33.1 million
pakistan: 91.5 million
 
  • +1
Reactions: curryslayerordeath
tbh identifying as pakistani is 100000x times better than identifying as iranian, id much rather associate with high t jihadi slayers than estrogenic trannies
identify as latino if u can tbh.

but I lol when I read 'estrogenic trannies' are Iranians really that bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: curryslayerordeath

Similar threads

mangotimer
Replies
8
Views
71
Zurrz
Zurrz
horseman.
Replies
4
Views
38
Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
Soy_Beta_Cuckold228
damnbrothiscrazy
Replies
0
Views
14
damnbrothiscrazy
damnbrothiscrazy
xevuxia
Replies
19
Views
82
xevuxia
xevuxia

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top