Anyanglover
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2021
- Posts
- 2,506
- Reputation
- 2,069
I'm a christian,not here to promote atheism but these are some arguments I've heard from some philosophical atheists.
in christianity(and all theism),God is unconditioned.however a unconditioned being cannot change,as to change by creating,willing(even self willing),knowing(even knowing itself) etc is to undergoe a intrinsic change(making it conditioned) not a cambridge one as even christian theologian dr.ryan mullins argues and a unconditioned being has no potentiality according to traditional christian scholars themselves.
because change is a result of some outside force acting upon a subject in aristotlean metaphysics(wich also refutes libertarian free will) wich christianity,maimonidean judaism and avicennian islam is based on.and God was the only subject.
furthermore for the son to incarnate in space time and a body would mean a intrinsic change,and since the son is identical with the 'actual' numerically one divine essence atleast in classic theism,that means that the entire Godhead has a added on human nature.
furthermore,a unconditioned mind sounds like a oxymoron since a mind changes by definition.
what are some more sophisticated christian replies to this?
I am not convinced of atheism either,because to deny a unconditioned essence altogether means everything is created in infinite regress.
in christianity(and all theism),God is unconditioned.however a unconditioned being cannot change,as to change by creating,willing(even self willing),knowing(even knowing itself) etc is to undergoe a intrinsic change(making it conditioned) not a cambridge one as even christian theologian dr.ryan mullins argues and a unconditioned being has no potentiality according to traditional christian scholars themselves.
because change is a result of some outside force acting upon a subject in aristotlean metaphysics(wich also refutes libertarian free will) wich christianity,maimonidean judaism and avicennian islam is based on.and God was the only subject.
furthermore for the son to incarnate in space time and a body would mean a intrinsic change,and since the son is identical with the 'actual' numerically one divine essence atleast in classic theism,that means that the entire Godhead has a added on human nature.
furthermore,a unconditioned mind sounds like a oxymoron since a mind changes by definition.
what are some more sophisticated christian replies to this?
I am not convinced of atheism either,because to deny a unconditioned essence altogether means everything is created in infinite regress.