How can girls wanting guy 6ft+ only be biological

[coppercope]

Think about this, 300 years ago in the early 1700s the average English / Scottish male soldier was 5’4.3 - 5’5.5. And now 300 years later girls won’t date anything below 6ft.
How is this purely genetically wired in the female brain, when men were this height only 300 years ago. Like I don’t understand how rejecting guys below 6ft can be biologically wired. Can someone elaborate this, discuss this? Hollywood, Media, Novels (the cause)?

 

[Deleted member 7776]

It's relative, they want the best guys they can possibly get.

 

[redhandsbluehands]

@john2 @TsarTsar444 @Blackout.xl
high iq users please respond to this man if you know

 

[Deleted member 4720]

It’s about society and percieved status. The studies about shoulder width etc show their true attraction

 

[Deleted member 3073]

they dont biologically need that. they just want a guy taller than them, and their archaic brains make a relation between the jump from 5' to 6' as "short" and "tall", when in real life any 5'10" average "manlet" can fraud 6'1".

 

[john2]

They want the best male they can ever get.
There's two factors about taller guys -

• women want a guy significantly taller than them
• and women want a guy who also height-mogs other men.

If you're asking why,
then maybe it's because they want the most strongest and genetically advanced male possible to protect and provide for them.

 

[Deleted member 7901]

@john2 @TsarTsar444 @Blackout.xl
high iq users please respond to this man if you know

I think that the comment above you is pretty good

however I will add that now with all of this propaganda and the sexual revolution, females want even
more since they can get a job, have more rights and can manipulate left and right without it backfiring

 

[Tusseleif]

The 6ft thing is just a meme and a round number, in metric countries, the magic number for acceptable height is 180 cm or 5’11, all about the round numbers. Girls just want a guy much taller, and the 6ft thing is a safe assurance seeing it is seen as tall because it starts with a 6

 

[oatmeal]

@Fuk answer this question u gargantuan jfl.

 

[Deleted member 3962]

@Fuk answer this question u gargantuan jfl.

Women are submissive and therefore want to feel small and protected by their partner. Men Under 6’0” will have a hard time giving off that protective vibe. A 5’9” girl literally told me this while hitting on me @ work.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Because they are dirty hypergamous sluts

 

[Deleted member 7776]

Women are submissive and therefore want to feel small and protected by their partner. Men Under 6’0” will have a hard time giving off that protective vibe. A 5’9” girl literally told me this while hitting on me @ work.

WHat I really hate is that they don't want you to be taller than them in normal shoes. They want you to be taller than them while they wear high heels. So if a 5'4 foid is wearing 4 inch high heels, she'll be around 5'7 or so so if you are 5'8 or something you're fucked

 

[Deleted member 3962]

WHat I really hate is that they don't want you to be taller than them in normal shoes. They want you to be taller than them while they wear high heels. So if a 5'4 foid is wearing 4 inch high heels, she'll be around 5'7 or so so if you are 5'8 or something you're fucked

i cant really relate because ive never had that problem but it sounds annoying. If you’re under 5’10 lifts are pretty much required tbh.

 

[Deleted member 7776]

i cant really relate because ive never had that problem but it sounds annoying. If you’re under 5’10 lifts are pretty much required tbh.

I'm 6'5, not talking about myself.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Its about relative position. In China, or thailand, women want to get with tall men, just like in sweden. But in thailand, the average man is something around 5’6 or 5’7. So women will get the best they can. In thailand, this might be a guy who is 5’10. But of course in sweden, a 5’10 man is below average.

Women are designed to pick the best available options. This doesnt mean best as in the strongest, or the fastest, or the smartest. Women do not observe these things and make decisions based on that. They look for sexual attractiveness. Height is a sexually attractive feature in men, and so women will pick tall men. Because women who pick tall men will reproduce daughters who have similar preferences, this means women will be born with a preference for tall men and select tall men more and more, where short men are selected less.

In the past, height was limited by natural fitness, because humans still essentially lived in the wilderness. In the jungle, height is extremely negative for your survival. Because of this, tall men died more, and were less likely to live as long, so even though women may have looked for the tallest man they could get, that man might only have been 5’4 or 5’3. However, they still had desire for height. They wanted the most sexually attractive man, so they would pick the tallest man available to them. This preference is not absolute, it is relative. So when a woman from Guatemala or Thailand comes to the united states, instead of being happy to get a 5’10 man like she might have been in her home country, she wants an above average man where she is at now.

 

[ShineBright]

Nooo women can't just be selective & try to find the best mate they can get! That's exactly what I'm doing!

 

[coppercope]

Nooo women can't just be selective & try to find the best mate they can get! That's exactly what I'm doing!

I’m pretty sure all us guys just want our looksmatch. Honestly I would be happy to be in a LTR with my looks match. Guys, don’t go seeking above their looksmatch. I mean yeah they would love too go out with a chick above their league however, they would just be pretty happy with a chick within their own league. However, now chicks just want guys 20x out of their league and refuse to settle with their looksmatch / guys in their league. The only guys who truely chase girls out of their league either have status or have wealth to compensate.

 

[NorwoodStyle]

This 6ft cutoff is too low. 6'3 is the current threshold for easy slaying, along with 5psl face and strong frame.
I'm slightly under 6'1 and I feel dead average in the sense that I don't really mog anybody except hardcore manlets. Most females almost look at me eye to eye with their stupid stilettos. When they are on the prowl, foids want someone who stands out compared to average men. And 6'3 is the minimum to do that. Face>everything and all that but being 6ft doesn't provide any edge whatsoever.

 

[Deleted member 9699]

This 6ft cutoff is too low. 6'3 is the current threshold for easy slaying, along with 5psl face and strong frame.
I'm slightly under 6'1 and I feel dead average in the sense that I don't really mog anybody except hardcore manlets. Most females almost look at me eye to eye with their stupid stilettos. When they are on the prowl, foids want someone who stands out compared to average men. And 6'3 is the minimum to do that. Face>everything and all that but being 6ft doesn't provide any edge whatsoever.

little too hardcore

6' 3"+ is bordering on 90th percentile in the US i think

unless ur in the netherlands i doubt 6' 3" is minimum, thats just absurd

 

[NorwoodStyle]

little too hardcore

6' 3"+ is bordering on 90th percentile in the US i think

unless ur in the netherlands i doubt 6' 3" is minimum, thats just absurd

I believe in the 95-5 rule so it's not that absurd to me. Although it's less likely for top 5% everything (height face frame) to overlap.
But I'm not saying you can't slay under 6'3. You just don't stand out, which doesn't help you slaying.

 

[Yoyo2233]

Its about relative position. In China, or thailand, women want to get with tall men, just like in sweden. But in thailand, the average man is something around 5’6 or 5’7. So women will get the best they can. In thailand, this might be a guy who is 5’10. But of course in sweden, a 5’10 man is below average.

Women are designed to pick the best available options. This doesnt mean best as in the strongest, or the fastest, or the smartest. Women do not observe these things and make decisions based on that. They look for sexual attractiveness. Height is a sexually attractive feature in men, and so women will pick tall men. Because women who pick tall men will reproduce daughters who have similar preferences, this means women will be born with a preference for tall men and select tall men more and more, where short men are selected less.

In the past, height was limited by natural fitness, because humans still essentially lived in the wilderness. In the jungle, height is extremely negative for your survival. Because of this, tall men died more, and were less likely to live as long, so even though women may have looked for the tallest man they could get, that man might only have been 5’4 or 5’3. However, they still had desire for height. They wanted the most sexually attractive man, so they would pick the tallest man available to them. This preference is not absolute, it is relative. So when a woman from Guatemala or Thailand comes to the united states, instead of being happy to get a 5’10 man like she might have been in her home country, she wants an above average man where she is at now.

Why was tall
bad for your survival?

 

[Yoyo2233]

This 6ft cutoff is too low. 6'3 is the current threshold for easy slaying, along with 5psl face and strong frame.
I'm slightly under 6'1 and I feel dead average in the sense that I don't really mog anybody except hardcore manlets. Most females almost look at me eye to eye with their stupid stilettos. When they are on the prowl, foids want someone who stands out compared to average men. And 6'3 is the minimum to do that. Face>everything and all that but being 6ft doesn't provide any edge whatsoever.

I agree
I’m 6’1
And don’t feel like I stand out At
All in the US. It’s brutal. 6’3
And you shouldn’t have any problems getting women

 

[Thetoastedaryan]

they dont biologically need that. they just want a guy taller than them, and their archaic brains make a relation between the jump from 5' to 6' as "short" and "tall", when in real life any 5'10" average "manlet" can fraud 6'1".

Absolute fact bucko.

T. 5'10" manlet who unintentionally frauds 6 feet in work boots

 

[Deleted member 10536]

Absolute fact bucko.

T. 5'10" manlet who unintentionally frauds 6 feet in work boots

Same, unironically have been forced to fraud and I actually begin to mog people I meet. Feeling the halo lately. I'm probably 6'1~2 frauded tho.

 

[Deleted member 9090]

little too hardcore

6' 3"+ is bordering on 90th percentile in the US i think

unless ur in the netherlands i doubt 6' 3" is minimum, thats just absurd

6 1 is minimum here, but you can still slay below that if you have good face. average foid is about 5 7 to 5 10 here ngl

 

[Deleted member 9090]

i legit sometimes doubt my height simply because people are so fucking tall here in the NL. I just measured again im legit 182 cm barefoot no bullshit and I get height mogged even when wearing timbs.

This is why ethnic life is harder in taller white countries because they are really short compared to the dutch guys

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

Why was tall
bad for your survival?

Its more difficult to navigate the jungle as a tall man. The space is very densely packed with vegetation so a small size is favored because you can move around quicker and more efficiently. Im sure there are other reasons as well, because every population that evolved in the jungle is usually shorter by quite a few inches than their couterparts who live in colder or dryer environments

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

Women want the best possible man. That doesn't mean they get it.

 

[Deleted member 5969]

they dont biologically need that. they just want a guy taller than them, and their archaic brains make a relation between the jump from 5' to 6' as "short" and "tall", when in real life any 5'10" average "manlet" can fraud 6'1".

Yup, I'm 5'7" and gotten away with 5'9"

 

[Deleted member 8080]

Average portuguese soldier in ww1 was 5 2 yet people say nutrition doesnt play that big a role in height

 

[Deleted member 2748]

The 6ft thing is just a meme and a round number, in metric countries, the magic number for acceptable height is 180 cm or 5’11, all about the round numbers. Girls just want a guy much taller, and the 6ft thing is a safe assurance seeing it is seen as tall because it starts with a 6

this
you can literally be 5'10 and claim 6'0, it's all about the round number

 

[homo_faber]

thats like asking why girls now wouldnt like to date a neet who is dependent from social welfare when that NEET has a higer living standard then a duke 600 years ago.

 

[Mouthbreath]

It's relative, they want the best guys they can possibly get.

tbh and rn facial beauty isnt understood by foids yet. As soon as they can put numbers to facial ratios etc, they will demand those things as well

rn we just live in a weird time where the only thing they really can quantify is height, but it would be wrong to say, that's all they care about. imo it is far less important than jaw or eye area.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

This 6ft cutoff is too low. 6'3 is the current threshold for easy slaying, along with 5psl face and strong frame.
I'm slightly under 6'1 and I feel dead average in the sense that I don't really mog anybody except hardcore manlets. Most females almost look at me eye to eye with their stupid stilettos. When they are on the prowl, foids want someone who stands out compared to average men. And 6'3 is the minimum to do that. Face>everything and all that but being 6ft doesn't provide any edge whatsoever.

Foids consider 6 foot, 6 figures and 6 inches the average. That's why its too low.

 

[Deleted member 14262]

Nooo women can't just be selective & try to find the best mate they can get! That's exactly what I'm doing!

No man creates arbritary standards whilst being a landwhale. Ever see a fat guy go "She needs to have D cup breasts."? The most you'll get off them are "I like girls with big boobs."

 

[Deleted member 13710]

It's relative, they want the best guys they can possibly get.

And "relative" now means "relative to what I see on the internet," so standards are higher than ever before.

 

[kalefartbomb]

They want to select for the best specimen males in their environment. And in the west (which dominates global culture) 6ft is a conveniently around 1 standard deviation above the average height (well 6'1 to be exact) but this varies by country and by the sample group.

So women of 300 years ago in looking for a tall husband would have been very happy with a guy who was 5'9. Interestingly hunter-gatherers had an average height of around 5'10 so they probably had similar female height selection as today, and this decreased several inches over the agricultural age.

 

[Deleted member 13462]

Think about this, 300 years ago in the early 1700s the average English / Scottish male soldier was 5’4.3 - 5’5.5. And now 300 years later girls won’t date anything below 6ft.
How is this purely genetically wired in the female brain, when men were this height only 300 years ago. Like I don’t understand how rejecting guys below 6ft can be biologically wired. Can someone elaborate this, discuss this? Hollywood, Media, Novels (the cause)?

Bro am not 6ft but why are u complaining at what girls want just live ur life this thread is sad

 

[ChristianChad]

Before humans starting eating grain some tribes in Europe reached 6 ft

 

[Deleted member 14264]

Why was tall
bad for your survival?

Apart from the navigation in jungles part, there are many more reasons to this.

1. You are bigger, hence you need more food (your basal metabolic rate is higher), and food is in scarcity if you are living in the wilderness.

2. Shorter males are RELATIVELY stronger than taller males. A taller male has more potential to be stronger then shorter one, but he should exercise more and he should have enough food to maintain good weight to height ratio.

Imagine yourself as a 190 cm giant in jungle, when other males are 170cm on average. Both of you weight somewhere near 70kgs, because you have pretty much the same amount of food. Shorter people of the same weight are stronger than someone who is taller, because they have mechanical advantages: muscles are distributed closer. Also shorter man's center of mass is closer to the ground, so it is harder to overpower him in grappling. His short reach of hand and legs is also an advantage in survival, because he can carry more weight and endure it longer. You can see an example of this in modern bodybuilding, where shorter males can lift weights easier.

3. Human organs are better suited to shorter heights, especially heart and blood system. When you grow taller, those can't catch up after certain limit (somewhere near 175-185cm), so consequently your organs work harder if you are taller. Hence, taller males will have less endurance and stamina, because heart can't pump the blood to the muscles and organs as fast as the heart of the short man.

4. The bigger you are, the easier it is to spot you for predators, and the easier it is to be killed by insects/snakes. Also your body is bigger, so there is more space for attacks.

5. The bigger you are, the slower you are. Your agility worsens.

 

[DharkDC]

Apart from the navigation in jungles part, there are many more reasons to this.

1. You are bigger, hence you need more food (your basal metabolic rate is higher), and food is in scarcity if you are living in the wilderness.

2. Shorter males are RELATIVELY stronger than taller males. A taller male has more potential to be stronger then shorter one, but he should exercise more and he should have enough food to maintain good weight to height ratio.

Imagine yourself as a 190 cm giant in jungle, when other males are 170cm on average. Both of you weight somewhere near 70kgs, because you have pretty much the same amount of food. Shorter people of the same weight are stronger than someone who is taller, because they have mechanical advantages: muscles are distributed closer. Also shorter man's center of mass is closer to the ground, so it is harder to overpower him in grappling. His short reach of hand and legs is also an advantage in survival, because he can carry more weight and endure it longer. You can see an example of this in modern bodybuilding, where shorter males can lift weights easier.

3. Human organs are better suited to shorter heights, especially heart and blood system. When you grow taller, those can't catch up after certain limit (somewhere near 175-185cm), so consequently your organs work harder if you are taller. Hence, taller males will have less endurance and stamina, because heart can't pump the blood to the muscles and organs as fast as the heart of the short man.

4. The bigger you are, the easier it is to spot you for predators, and the easier it is to be killed by insects/snakes. Also your body is bigger, so there is more space for attacks.

5. The bigger you are, the slower you are. Your agility worsens.

Manlet propaganda, ik you gonna rope when you clock the most fastest man

 

[Deleted member 14264]

Manlet propaganda, ik you gonna rope when you clock the most fastest man

Lol dude, of course modern athletes are tall, especially those who run (long legs), but you MUST take into consideration the fact that modern athlete can eat as much food as his body needs, so of course he will achieve 100% out of his height potential. Now you must think about the fact that back then humans did not have enough food, so your average tall Joe would be underfed twink and he will not have a chance to use his long body as an advantage.

Also, stop being so delusional about height. Of course it is crucial in attractiveness and females like tall guys, and tall guys can assert dominance much easier, but that does not mean that height is good in every aspect of life. It is clearly bad to be tall from a medical point of view, and it is clear that being tall is a disadvantage in many situations, especially it was in the jungle era!

 

[Deleted member 14264]

Lol dude, of course modern athletes are tall, especially those who run (long legs), but you MUST take into consideration the fact that modern athlete can eat as much food as his body needs, so of course he will achieve 100% out of his height potential. Now you must think about the fact that back then humans did not have enough food, so your average tall Joe would be underfed twink and he will not have a chance to use his long body as an advantage.

Also, stop being so delusional about height. Of course it is crucial in attractiveness and females like tall guys, and tall guys can assert dominance much easier, but that does not mean that height is good in every aspect of life. It is clearly bad to be tall from a medical point of view, and it is clear that being tall is a disadvantage in many situations, especially it was in the jungle era!

Still would like to be tall, because the quality of life and halo effect would make me somewhat happier, but I also try to see things from all views and realistically speaking, long body is not good from all points of view

 

[Deleted member 14264]

Manlet propaganda, ik you gonna rope when you clock the most fastest man

And yeah, I knew that Usein Bolt is 190+cm tall, that fact does not dissolve my point