D
Deleted member 11126
Fuchsia
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2020
- Posts
- 11,722
- Reputation
- 14,467
In real life and on reddit I always hear about these climate change retards who say they aren't having kids because its cruel and bad for the planet.
If you truly believe this will do any good then you are doing more harm then you realize. Anti natalism only effects thoughtful people this will not effect the hordes of sub 100 IQ people who have kids without thought. If you think we have a moral responsibility to prevent suffering of children and unfit parents then eugenics would be the logical solution for every thoughtful person not having kids because of carbon emissions or because the world sucks there are 10-20 retards having kids in their place. People are filtering themselves out of the genepool when they would make better parents then a lot of these dysgenic freaks.
It just doesn't make sense to me you either believe in anti natalism + eugenics or you don't really believe in the principles behind anti natalism and you want dysgenics.
If you truly believe this will do any good then you are doing more harm then you realize. Anti natalism only effects thoughtful people this will not effect the hordes of sub 100 IQ people who have kids without thought. If you think we have a moral responsibility to prevent suffering of children and unfit parents then eugenics would be the logical solution for every thoughtful person not having kids because of carbon emissions or because the world sucks there are 10-20 retards having kids in their place. People are filtering themselves out of the genepool when they would make better parents then a lot of these dysgenic freaks.
It just doesn't make sense to me you either believe in anti natalism + eugenics or you don't really believe in the principles behind anti natalism and you want dysgenics.