How did the idea that looks don't matter for men become a mainstream idea?

klip11

klip11

Narcy pirate Guardian of squirtle
Joined
Sep 10, 2022
Posts
30,471
Reputation
43,837
It's always been the idea that women's looks matter, but a man could be butt ugly and still be successful with women. The only thing that matters is money and inward qualities for men. It also comes from porn. You have traditionally unattractive guys like Ron Jeremy who was one of the most famous male pornstars and got to slay Stacies.

Also, women are more likely to settle for an unattractive man if he brings a certain amount of money or status to the table. When women couldn't work, they needed a man to provide. So they would settle for a man who was ugly if he had a decent paying job. And even today, money matters less. But, once you start to move into the 6 figure range and even the millionaire range, money will certainly help you. You have sugar baby dating sites and the women on their might be willing to date and have sex with an ugly man if he can provide her with a certain lifestyle like trips to Paris or shopping trips in L.A. or New York City. Or a high powered politician who's older will be able to attract much younger women with his status. Think President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky who was 22 years old at the time and Clinton was well into his 50s.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30411, Skywalker, Deleted member 50702 and 5 others
because too many people (like myself) come from non lookist countries where you can look like something from another planet that snuck on planet earth but can still have a dating life
 
  • +1
Reactions: abcd, poopoohead, Skywalker and 2 others
Women Date subhumans Sometimes

And ITS hard to explain why
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pay and Deleted member 23472
You only say that if you are nt
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pay
Because this was the case for the majority of human history. Women have always been hypergamous to an extent but these insane levels it has reached today, to the point where looks are this important for men, are due to excessive female freedom. Plus Jewish propaganda.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30411, lwlaiet060920, Deleted member 23974 and 3 others
patriarchy unironically
 
  • +1
Reactions: Pay and klip11
because people used to hist date their villge looksmatch no point in talking about looks then globalisation started happening and people realized other races were ugly and then the internet made every foid want chad only wh8ch made looks matter
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30024, lwlaiet060920 and Deleted member 23974
I think it was because Boomers were blasted by the first TV shows that had to be virtuous because they were the first TV shows. (The film titled Marty is an exception.) Many men died in the bloodiest war in humany history: World War II, and because it was virtually only male deaths, the Boomer generation didn't have competition from older men because they died, and so it had to have been easier for that reason. Globalisation only really took off around the seventies, and the World Wide Web was only utilised for matchmaking in the late nineties.
It was way way way easier for Boomers, so the lies distilled from TV broadcasts were mistaken for truth, lies passed between generations, and put under increasing strain of blackpill until the advent of PUA for mellenial incels, and proceeded by PUAhate and looks theory.

Also, it's only for the last half century that female sexuality has been able to express itself. Male centerfolds (Chad in underwear posing and printed over two pages) in magazines started showing up in the seventies.
Only recently has the ability to study female sexuality become avaliable, and that's what's been happening in these longitudinal university studies, and as crude as the Chad Tinder experiments are, it's a lot closer to science than anything bluepill has.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 30024, lwlaiet060920 and klip11
It came from the 90s/early 2000s. Now we reverted back to default
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21345 and Lookologist003
I think it was because Boomers were blasted by the first TV shows that had to be virtuous because they were the first TV shows. (The film titled Marty is an exception.) Many men died in the bloodiest war in humany history: World War II, and because it was virtually only male deaths, the Boomer generation didn't have competition from older men because they died, and so it had to have been easier for that reason. Globalisation only really took off around the seventies, and the World Wide Web was only utilised for matchmaking in the late nineties.
It was way way way easier for Boomers, so the lies distilled from TV broadcasts were mistaken for truth, lies passed between generations, and put under increasing strain of blackpill until the advent of PUA for mellenial incels, and proceeded by PUAhate and looks theory.

Also, it's only for the last half century that female sexuality has been able to express itself. Male centerfolds (Chad in underwear posing and printed over two pages) in magazines started showing up in the seventies.
Only recently has the ability to study female sexuality become avaliable, and that's what's been happening in these longitudinal university studies, and as crude as the Chad Tinder experiments are, it's a lot closer to science than anything bluepill has.
Good reply 👍
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Lookologist003
It's to keep you a good little slave thinking you will be rewarded with a stacy after being a good wagie
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead, Skywalker and klip11
It's always been the idea that women's looks matter, but a man could be butt ugly and still be successful with women. The only thing that matters is money and inward qualities for men. It also comes from porn. You have traditionally unattractive guys like Ron Jeremy who was one of the most famous male pornstars and got to slay Stacies.

Also, women are more likely to settle for an unattractive man if he brings a certain amount of money or status to the table. When women couldn't work, they needed a man to provide. So they would settle for a man who was ugly if he had a decent paying job. And even today, money matters less. But, once you start to move into the 6 figure range and even the millionaire range, money will certainly help you. You have sugar baby dating sites and the women on their might be willing to date and have sex with an ugly man if he can provide her with a certain lifestyle like trips to Paris or shopping trips in L.A. or New York City. Or a high powered politician who's older will be able to attract much younger women with his status. Think President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky who was 22 years old at the time and Clinton was well into his 50s.
Because foids avoid accountability at all costs
 
Because it wasnt important before. Sub5 grand dad married my stacy grand ma because she liked the fact that he was ambitious and hardworking. Her words.
 
  • +1
Reactions: poopoohead and klip11
because ugly men will cope to the ends of time with bs.......
 
Because the need for survival is biologically more important than the need for reproduction. In the past, if you could bring food back to the tribe and provide a shelter, you were guaranteed to have a family. Therefore money, social status and political power mattered much more than look back then.

Only in the modern world, most people dont have to worry about food and protection anymore. So the need for reproduction is prevailing now.

The richer and more developed a society is, the more hypergamous it will become.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bwrauycnee and klip11
Its a Feminist myth just like how women apparently date down all the time
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11

Similar threads

IliaTopuria
Replies
0
Views
14
IliaTopuria
IliaTopuria
IbalmeHponeMin
Replies
1
Views
22
Vilpil
Vilpil
BWC_virgin
Replies
6
Views
52
AryanTrvecel
AryanTrvecel
joshwashere
Replies
2
Views
24
joshwashere
joshwashere
_MVP_
Replies
0
Views
25
_MVP_
_MVP_

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →