![bobsmith03](/data/avatars/l/34/34033.jpg?1695851511)
bobsmith03
Diamond
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2023
- Posts
- 1,310
- Reputation
- 681
I heard ante face is ideal or even orthognathic. My lower third is not ante face enough. I have enough facial width, I used this post: https://looksmax.org/threads/update-how-to-measure-forward-growth-v2.138195/#post-2347982 and got around 1.12
original vs "bimax" morph. I basically rotated the midface and lower jaw counter clock wise.
Occulus plane estimate: 13 deg
mandible to floor angle: 25 deg
gonial angle: 125deg
FDHR: 1.12
My question is how do I get the lower portion to match with upper. Would genio suffice or would that just extend chin and not move soft tissue like lips and the part under lips. Do I need to get bimax based on my calculations?
my head against wall doing chin tuck and in frankfurt plane
another pic neutral side profile
original vs "bimax" morph. I basically rotated the midface and lower jaw counter clock wise.
Occulus plane estimate: 13 deg
mandible to floor angle: 25 deg
gonial angle: 125deg
FDHR: 1.12
My question is how do I get the lower portion to match with upper. Would genio suffice or would that just extend chin and not move soft tissue like lips and the part under lips. Do I need to get bimax based on my calculations?
my head against wall doing chin tuck and in frankfurt plane
another pic neutral side profile