How do religious people cope about "god loves everyone equally" when dolph lundgren exists

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

this argument doesn't make sense because it confuses divine love with evolutionary or social value. in nature, survival and reproduction are favored traits—tall, symmetrical, intelligent individuals often get more opportunities. but nature doesn't assign moral or metaphysical worth; it’s just selection bias. when you say “god loves,” you’re invoking a spiritual concept, but judging it with criteria from biology, status, and looks.


if you're religious, god’s love isn’t based on sexual market value, iq, height, or birthplace. that's a human, darwinian framework. from a theological perspective, especially in traditions like christianity or islam, god’s love is rooted in being, not ranking. the beggar and the king are equally dust. from a purely natural point of view, though, neither is “loved” at all—because nature doesn’t love. it favors function.


so blending a metaphysical idea like god's love with hypergamous or status-based logic just collapses the categories. you're trying to run windows programs on linux—they weren’t built for the same system.


i'm not christian or islamic, neither do I believe in afterlife and/or karma. you are ignorant about the topic, yet you bark about it as if you had some type of unique perspective on it. and that's all I pointed out.

Fucking he’ll your probably the best philosopher on this side barring me ofc im ver impressed