How do you fly in the face of stats?

[thecel]

One of the easiest things to do in debates is to back your points with studies and data if such studies are readily available, and one of the most difficult things to pull off in debates is to successfully argue points that aren’t supported by science or differ from what science says.

Quite a few bluepillers and redpillers have reached common ground with blackpillers in YouTube debates, but blackpillers failed to convince bluepillers about some of the more brutal blackpilled beliefs (that aren’t so obvious to normies), such as the fact that most women who’re in LTRs with subhumans cheat on them with Petachads. We can’t provide enough scientific evidence that supports this claim, so bluepillers dismiss the argument. How do you convincingly argue, to non-blackpillers, claims that mainstream science doesn’t support?

Claiming bluepilled studies are wrong is an even bigger challenge. It’s not easy at all to convince people, for example, that women lied in surveys. How do you fly in the face of stats?

---

All the good looking whores with the asian dudes are cheaters and you know this

How should one go about persuading normies of that? One of my missions is to spread the blackpill and eradicate the bluepill, but many blackpilled beliefs are difficult to argue for. Like the fact that women who’re with Asian men are definitely cheaters. I’ve failed to find evidence that supports it, but you and I know it’s true. Sadly, many things that us blackpillers regard as common sense aren’t common sense to bluepillers, so we can’t just back our arguments with “common sense” or “obvious truths.” Lots of people dismiss arguments (arguments they don’t agree with) unless the arguments are served with citations to quote-unquote “reliable” sources, which are usually bluepilled.

 

[gamma]

that most women who’re in LTRs with subhumans cheat on them with GigaTyrones

Swap tyrones with blue eyed chads

 

[Deleted member 13332]

I eat their ass kiss them in a nipples

 

[Vermilioncore]

The most brutal blackpill that is hardly discussed is that women have a biological urge to be raped and completely obliterated. Women just want to be treated like pieces of meat and be violated by a hard fat cock. Women want to be raped while their husband is brutally killed.

 

[subhuman incel]

did you just switch out gigatyrones with petachads? are you racisst?

 

[thecel]

did you just switch out gigatyrones with petachads? are you racisst?

I did it per @gamma’s request (but I put peta- instead of blue-eyed):

Swap tyrones with blue eyed chads

Keep in mind Tyrones ARE Chads.

 

[subhuman incel]

just debate with low iq people that believe anything you say theory

 

[Deleted member 15129]

It's also super hard to control those bluepilled studies because the age ranges arent precisely limited and ofc women lie. But past 30 they do legit look for personality for betabuxx.

Unfortunately without an incel organization backed by some people, we can't have conclusive studies on the subject. r/blackpillscience compiles blackpilled studies and is good tbh, but still not comprehensive.

Also the truth is, with something with as many factors as relationships it's really hard to pin down. As much as we like to think literally every girl is the same, the truth is there are unicorns probably 1/100.

 

[Deleted member 5180]

Because most normies already know their gf is likely wanting to cheat on them with chad or worse already doing it. They want to cope

 

[thecel]

Because most normies already know their gf is likely wanting to cheat on them with chad or worse already doing it. They want to cope

Hmmm … I don’t think bluepilled guys are secretly blackpilled and coping. I think bluepillers really believe the bluepill.

 

[subhuman incel]

idk there is not really much you can do other than digging for very unknown,rare studies that prove your point. if you just talk out of your mouth without having studies, people will just dismiss everything you say, they will say anecdotes dont count. so best thing to do is to become a master in reading studies and point out the flaws of your opponent, and provide as much good studies you can that prove your point.

 

[studiocel]

According to statistics published in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (USA), 57% of men and 54% of women admit to having cheated at some point in their lives when in a relationship. However it dousnt show the demographics of who they surveyed.

 

[thecel]

According to statistics published in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (USA), 57% of men and 54% of women admit to having cheated at some point in their lives when in a relationship. However it dousnt show the demographics of who they surveyed.

Good stats bro. Though I’d like to see studies showing women cheat—

• on far more partners
• with far more other partners
• way more frequently
• with way less regret
• with people of much higher SMV than the women’s significant others
• with people of much higher SMV then the women themselves

—relative to men’s cheating stats.

 

[ETO]

Entrusting your worldview on researchers who you don't even know rather than your own experience

 

[Deleted member 11610]

Lol you can pull stats out of your ass and normies will believe it so long as you sound like YOU are convinced in what you are telling them. I photoshopped a bunch of photos of women's vaginas that looked liked they'd had multiple trains ran through them onto some "University of Zurich" study and claimed that the looseness of pussies had a correlation to body count just so I could make some normies seethe at me on Reddit and it worked for a little bit.